that wasn't my question.so I don't want to vote for it, which is what you asked me about
My question was: so what if they have a shady past compared to the alternative?
that wasn't my question.so I don't want to vote for it, which is what you asked me about
All I care about is getting the tories out.your canvassing technique needs a little work Who PhD
in which case: your canvassing technique needs a little work.All I care about is getting the tories out.
He's just read the news, like everyone else. They don't get any secret info via tory backchannels.
I was objecting to the present day Labour Party as much as its past forms.that wasn't my question.
My question was: so what if they have a shady past compared to the alternative?
Isn't 'coming to terms with...' usually code for addiction of some sort?
Seeing the Sky interview, I suspect some sort of prescription downers...
Choosing not to vote doesn't work though, it just enables the Tories.I was objecting to the present day Labour Party as much as its past forms.
so then the follow up question I guess is, so what if they have a shady present compared to the alternative? by which I'm assuming you mean the Tories. Well I'm not voting for them or anyone else either, but my answer would be that as a socialist I necessarily believe in an alternative that cannot be achieved through parliament and which the Labour Party is an active opponent of. so that's what I try to direct my effort towards as best as I can.
Hasn't engaged? Are you serious?
The only people that haven't responded are morons like Class War and Ian Bone's sad little crowd
Firstly...didn't ask you to search for anything.
Secondly, don't actually give a shit what you believe on the matter. You didn't see the debate. When you say "Dugdale immediately denied this categorically." you're talking utter garbage. Lying basically.
You posted "Dugdale immediately denied this categorically."
You're a liar. She did no such thing.
Spot fucking on. Every non vote is a vote for the privatisation of the NHS, for more tax cuts for the rich, for less money into education and care. We have to get out and vote for whoeverChoosing not to vote doesn't work though, it just enables the Tories.
and voting for Labour enables Labour, which as I've explained isn't something I want to do.Choosing not to vote doesn't work though, it just enables the Tories.
Why can't you support voting as a socialist?
Because Labour aren't socialist, however much the media try to paint Corbyn as a latter-day Stalin.
Yes, that's why I said your plan enables the tories. There's only two outcomes (barring the highly implausible). So which is worse in your opinion? Labour, I presume.and voting for Labour enables Labour, which as I've explained isn't something I want to do.
Yes, that's why I said your plan enables the tories. There's only two outcomes (barring the highly implausible). So which is worse in your opinion? Labour, I presume.
I haven't seen a reason put forward. I've just been told "i'm not voting labour", that's it.What's the point of pursuing this line of arguing? I'm voting Labour, I've got out there and I have canvassed for Labour but there are a good number of people on here with well thought out reasons as to why they cannot or will not do either of those things and you aren't going to convince them otherwise like this. In any case, left of Labour but won't vote Labour isn't really a large demographic which is worth pursuing for many votes..
I will humour you and gaze into the future to let you know that with Labour achieving a majority in the general election and attempting to implement a few mild reforms, there is a retaliation of capital flight, an attack on sterling along with relentless attacks from the right and sabotage from within the PLP leads to a big crisis and Corbyn's government collapses. There follows a vicious reaction resulting in the next election a hard right Tory government even more vile than what we have now and the total discrediting of left wing ideas as they are proven totally 'unworkable'.Yes, that's why I said your plan enables the tories. There's only two outcomes (barring the highly implausible). So which is worse in your opinion? Labour, I presume.
The argument has been had about 50 million times on this forum in the last couple of months and I don't think anyone's interested in having it againI haven't seen a reason put forward. I've just been told "i'm not voting labour", that's it.
Erm... So someone saying 'I'm a socialist and Labour aren't isn't a reason? To name but one put forward.I haven't seen a reason put forward. I've just been told "i'm not voting labour", that's it.
I will humour you and gaze into the future to let you know that with Labour achieving a majority in the general election and attempting to implement a few mild reforms, there is a retaliation of capital flight, an attack on sterling along with relentless attacks from the right and sabotage from within the PLP leads to a big crisis and Corbyn's government collapses. There follows a vicious reaction resulting in the next election a hard right Tory government even more vile than what we have now and the total discrediting of left wing ideas as they are proven totally 'unworkable'.
And as if that weren't enough, in seven billion years the Sun will run out of hydrogen and collapse, which will presumably bring an end - amongst other things - to Tunnocks teacake production. It's hard to know what the point of getting out of bed is any more.I will humour you and gaze into the future to let you know that with Labour achieving a majority in the general election and attempting to implement a few mild reforms, there is a retaliation of capital flight, an attack on sterling along with relentless attacks from the right and sabotage from within the PLP leads to a big crisis and Corbyn's government collapses. There follows a vicious reaction resulting in the next election a hard right Tory government even more vile than what we have now and the total discrediting of left wing ideas as they are proven totally 'unworkable'.
yeh. the left. but how far left? the thing is of course that anarchists oppose the state and the labour party rather support it. i don't know how you propose to square that particular circle.
I haven't seen a reason put forward. I've just been told "i'm not voting labour", that's it.