mikey mikey
Active Member
24th September 2005. Twelve years ago, got anything more current?
24th September 2005. Twelve years ago, got anything more current?
Leaving Corbyn out of local campaigning is fine, especially given the stark contrast with the personality based approach of the May Party. Similarly burning local issues need to be highlighted, but campaigning without reference to the manifesto exposes division which is ripe for exploitation. How will Abbott or Thornberry deal with persistent questioning about large numbers of prominent LP candidates ignoring the headline policies?Well yes. We hear quite enough about him, and national policy, as it is. I prefer this sort of campaigning even though I'm generally pro Corbyn. I hope it persists.
I was sure I'd heard that story years ago, and was rather surprised to see it being dated May '17, so thanks for researching that and confirming my suspicionsCan you point me to the content of the update? The Mirror's site algorithms have simply added a May video clip to any article tagged "Conservative".
No, not really. I just posted that to explain why I thought it was news. Turns out I should have checked the date. So thanks for helping me out. I mean, it could have been some prick with sidey remarks instead of your helpful reminder.
Meanwhile, back to incompetency v. intentional throwing of election
No, what they're trying to do is use their huge projected majority to ditch policies they don't want but have had to accept in the past. Obviously they've not felt confident enough to do that with the immigration target, which everyone knows they have no intention of implementing, but the triple lock, winter fuel and social care are all remnants of socialised provision they're ideologically opposed to. They could not have ditched those policies in 2010 or 2015, the polling was too ambiguous, but this time she/they thought they could rebrand and make their contempt for the lower middle class and working class homeowners quite explicit without significant electoral penalty.I'm increasingly wondering if Conservative Central Office are actually trying to throw this election..
No, what they're trying to do is use their huge projected majority to ditch policies they don't want but have had to accept in the past. Obviously they've not felt confident enough to do that with the immigration target, which everyone knows they have no intention of implementing, but the triple lock, winter fuel and social care are all remnants of socialised provision they're ideologically opposed to. They could not have ditched those policies in 2010 or 2015, the polling was too ambiguous, but this time she/they thought they could rebrand and make their contempt for the lower middle class and working class homeowners quite explicit without significant electoral penalty.
strong and stable incompetence/arrogance/overreach
but what do *you* think?
...because...i don't think this is helpful...
I agree - or at least it's not as helpful as using the far more damaging slogan they've dumped right in your lap, one that's already now in public consciousness. Dt should be hammered.i don't think this is helpful...
peace in our timeWhich slogan?
Dementia Tax.Which slogan?
...because...
And what is Jeremy Corbyn’s plan? He can promise a nonsensical, fantasy policy that can only be funded through massive tax rises on younger generations. In fact, just recently he threatened to increase the basic rate of income tax for millions of people from 20 to 25 per cent to fund social care. That tells you everything you need to know about Jeremy Corbyn’s answer to the problem.