Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

TfL denied Uber operator license, ride hailing service wins on appeal (Sept 2020)

I've used Uber once when i was with a friend who's got an account.

I very, very rarely take taxis -- i take the bus or walk. Surprised at the number of people on here who use Ubers/taxis.

Yeah I've only ever taken one uber in my life, I prefer to walk or get the train / tube. The one uber I took did save me a bit though and I was hammered and staggering the streets of some suburban hole in the early hours. It would have been a very very long walk had it not been for uber.
 
Why a bad decision?

Did you read the stuff about Greyball? Or is this just an inconvenience to you?
It won't inconvenience me at all, as the vast majority of my travel round London is in Black cabs. But if the Uber drivers are anything like the ones up here in Birmingham they all vastly prefer driving for them than they do traditional minicab firms - the flexability and safety being the major points they all say when asked about it.
 
It won't inconvenience me at all, as the vast majority of my travel round London is in Black cabs. But if the Uber drivers are anything like the ones up here in Birmingham they all vastly prefer driving for them than they do traditional minicab firms - the flexability and safety being the major points they all say when asked about it.
Workers get used to being exploited so they don't complain about one marginally less exploitative employer
 
It won't inconvenience me at all, as the vast majority of my travel round London is in Black cabs. But if the Uber drivers are anything like the ones up here in Birmingham they all vastly prefer driving for them than they do traditional minicab firms - the flexability and safety being the major points they all say when asked about it.

And presumably all the licensing stuff and lack of background checks on drivers is irrelevant?

I don't really mind either way but we spend a lot of time on this site complaining how shyster companies just trample over laws, tax laws etc, yet here we have an authority doing what they are supposed to do and actually standing up to a mega corporate beast yet its a "ridiculous decision". Bit odd unless I've missed something.
 
can those expressing concern for the drivers point me to thier previous statements regarding those workers pay, conditions and lack of rights?
Depends whether or not you swallow the anti-Uber propaganda that gets punted around, particularly in light of the fact that we have a private hire professional on this very thread, basically saying that Uber are pretty much standard (or better) for the industry as a whole. You also don't have to be a workers rights crusader to sympathise with 40,000 drivers potentially looking for new jobs, many of whom will be saddled with expensive vehicle finance contracts.
 
And presumably all the licensing stuff and lack of background checks on drivers is irrelevant?

I don't really mind either way but we spend a lot of time on this site complaining how shyster companies just trample over laws, tax laws etc, yet here we have an authority doing what they are supposed to do and actually standing up to a mega corporate beast yet its a "ridiculous decision". Bit odd unless I've missed something.

TfL licensed Uber before, they've not identified specific failings between the original license and the renewal; the only thing that has changed is the leadership at City Hall. This is a negotiation plain and simple.
 
And presumably all the licensing stuff and lack of background checks on drivers is irrelevant?
I guess this is one of those "London is different" things, because here in Birmingham at least an Uber driver has to have exactly the same license/checks as any other minicab driver.

If that's not the case in London, why? Simply put that in place and problem solved.
 
TfL licensed Uber before, they've not identified specific failings between the original license and the renewal; the only thing that has changed is the leadership at City Hall. This is a negotiation plain and simple.
Exactly. If I was in charge of Uber I would be backing the fuck down on all of the points TFL have highlighted. Drop Greyball in London and kick some arses round the fleet dept to ensure they are compliant with the first three points. This isn't about worker rights and London is probably one of their few straight up profitable markets.
 
I guess this is one of those "London is different" things, because here in Birmingham at least an Uber driver has to have exactly the same license/checks as any other minicab driver.

If that's not the case in London, why? Simply put that in place and problem solved.

It is the case, but when someone doesn't follow that rule..................
 
TfL licensed Uber before, they've not identified specific failings between the original license and the renewal; the only thing that has changed is the leadership at City Hall. This is a negotiation plain and simple.

Yeah as I said at the start I reckon this is all about Greyball. I think you're right though, it's hard to see how this would have happened with Johnson running the show.
 
Londoners complaining about lose of Uber. Rest of country absolutely fails to sympathise.
 
I guess this is one of those "London is different" things, because here in Birmingham at least an Uber driver has to have exactly the same license/checks as any other minicab driver.

If that's not the case in London, why? Simply put that in place and problem solved.

They were warned and given a four month temporary license to give them time to get their shit together and comply. Whether in terms of resources or incompetence their London fleet dept is not up to the task and has failed to do so. What else could TFL do? It's Uber's failing not TFL singling them out. I've sat through dozens of PCO inspections, the rules are strict but very clear.
 
Workers get used to being exploited so they don't complain about one marginally less exploitative employer
The couple of Über drivers in London I asked said it was a good deal. Who are you to infantilise them, you don't even sit in the front to ask. Which to me is weirdly childlike.
 
The couple of Über drivers in London I asked said it was a good deal. Who are you to infantilise them, you don't even sit in the front to ask. Which to me is weirdly childlike.
There is no umlaut on the U in the company name.

It is and it isn't a good deal. 3 years ago they had the best deal in town (which is how they got all the drivers) but they've dropped rates and increased commission considerably since then.
 
I'm aware of that maomao and if this situation the company is in is due to incompetence and they've flooded the market Uber is crap. But no need to gloat over the workforce who potentially wind up unemployed with mouths to feed and rent to pay.
 
Depends whether or not you swallow the anti-Uber propaganda that gets punted around, particularly in light of the fact that we have a private hire professional on this very thread, basically saying that Uber are pretty much standard (or better) for the industry as a whole. You also don't have to be a workers rights crusader to sympathise with 40,000 drivers potentially looking for new jobs, many of whom will be saddled with expensive vehicle finance contracts.
Well, the market is the market - it won't suddenly shrink, and there are thousands of local minicab offices, as well as apps that compare different minicab companies.

I wonder if the timing - the first licence renewal after the 24-hour tube started - is interesting (of course not all the tube is open).

Fwi, I think licencing and the wider law (employment, tax, date, etc) is still trying to catch up with these silicon valley new Victorians, hell bent as they are to exploit the space between them and local markets before their little dotcom bubble bursts.

After Johnson turned a blind eye for 4 years, Mayor Khan is applying the brakes is all. It's not over - there are $10 billions in the game now and, in case of any doubt, it is about the car leasing more than Uber itself - Goldman Sachs aren't funding Uber for cab fares.

This is new unsecured mortgage game - wrap up the vehicle debt in other securities and ride the wave.
 
Last edited:
Uber's PR firms are certainly earning their money today - I've seen Sky, BBC and CNN all repeating the claim that 3.5 million Londoners use Uber (which is probably based on the Uber press release where it actually said that 3.5 million people had downloaded its app, which may itself be that the app was downloaded 3.5 million times).
 
If they go then we're back to shit overpriced unlicensed cabs outside nightclubs - uber are perfect for night time travel back from clubs between clubs or to after parties etc - that's the only time I use them
 
in case of any doubt, it is about the car leasing more than Uber itself - Goldman Sachs aren't funding Uber for cab fares

The leasing side of it is huge but in turnover terms a back of a fag packet calculation suggests in London it's equivalent to about 15-20% of Uber's turnover and the turnover from leasing is lower than Uber's cut of the fare money. And that would be if every Uber driver leased, which they don't.
 
Back
Top Bottom