Give it a few years and the facial recognition tech will be cheap enough to be easily deployed. It's already being used in China.
And you assume that sainsburys cameras will provide footage of high enough quality ?
Give it a few years and the facial recognition tech will be cheap enough to be easily deployed. It's already being used in China.
They can match it with banks statements, atm, etc, in airports time of flights, etc.
I see you like to question but you don't like to answerShoot the messenger, why not contact the author of the article, Dr
Jay Watts, or the source of the article, Steve Topple.
Now they’ve served a court order to your bank and Sainsbury’s - this is all adding up !
You are forgetting that big mad conspiracies involving lots of people or organisations cost a lot of money, and sometimes the old fashioned ways are better.
Alex
And you assume that sainsburys cameras will provide footage of high enough quality ?
Surveillance in society: key issues for the 2010 Parliament 2010I think the impact of this is much more likely to be on the day-to-day feelings and behaviour of people on benefits than on actual investigations. I have experienced the paranoia and it is horrible, corrosive, disabling, and discourages you from doing things that might promote your wellbeing
This can only get worse as we become more and more of a surveillance society.
Thank you for that not very relevant link.
You're welcome. If you look at the readily available material such as Lace's 2005 book the glass consumer or the link I provided which you disparage you'd understand how much of a surveillance society this is and has been for years. But let's refuse to inform ourselves and keep the discussion at a level of platitudes.Thank you for that not very relevant link.
Of course. Tech gets cheaper. It would certainly be in there intrests to be able to track repeat thiefs and other people they consider undesirable so they can be stopped shortly after coming in store.
Have you ever looked into the West German socialist patients collective?Would a better way of limiting the power of conspiracists within disability/MH politics be to support those struggles, and to support the development of class-struggle analysis/activity within those struggles?
As irritating as treelover is, his complaint isn’t entirely without merit
Have you ever looked into the West German socialist patients collective?
I’m pretty sure this thread is about what is happening today, not what could be done with as yet not successfully implemented technology in the future.
For facial recognition see...
UK police use of facial recognition technology a failure, says report
Alex
pair that with gait recognition and its all fucked. Who knew everyone had an individual signature walking style? fucking cyberdyne
Think they've been using gr at some airports for years, will have to checkpair that with gait recognition and its all fucked. Who knew everyone had an individual signature walking style? fucking cyberdyne
His complaints are often about things that do have merit - that's what is so irritating about them, because he always presents them as if he is the lone voice in the wilderness, championing freedom and justice for the underdog, while whining that nobody else is doing anything, when all he appears to be doing is griping about stuff and the inaction of others, and not actually doing any more than he complains other people are (not) doing.Would a better way of limiting the power of conspiracists within disability/MH politics be to support those struggles, and to support the development of class-struggle analysis/activity within those struggles?
As irritating as treelover is, his complaint isn’t entirely without merit
Not to mention that his constant whines about the left betray his real political inclinationsHis complaints usually do have merit - that's what is so irritating about them, because he always presents them as if he is the lone voice in the wilderness, championing freedom and justice for the under dog, while whining that nobody else is doing anything, while all he appears to be doing is griping about stuff and the inaction of others, and not actually doing any more than he complains other people are (not) doing.
The reality is that there a lot of people who are doing a lot more than he is. He undermines the cause by continually playing on the shortfalls, without making any acknowledgement of, eg., the fact that the stories are even out there is down to the work that someone (not he) is doing.
It boils my piss when people whinge about others doing nothing to 'help the cause', when they themselves are only hurting 'the cause', with their incessant whining and finger pointing at those who may actually be doing something.His complaints are often about things that do have merit - that's what is so irritating about them, because he always presents them as if he is the lone voice in the wilderness, championing freedom and justice for the underdog, while whining that nobody else is doing anything, when all he appears to be doing is griping about stuff and the inaction of others, and not actually doing any more than he complains other people are (not) doing.
The reality is that there a lot of people who are doing a lot more than he is. He undermines the cause by continually playing on the shortfalls, without making any acknowledgement of, eg., the fact that the stories are even out there is down to the work that someone (not he) is doing.
I've never concerned myself too much with his real political inclinations...Not to mention that his constant whines about the left betray his real political inclinations
Best not to reallyI've never concerned myself too much with his real political inclinations...
Yeah, I am a bit baffled as to why the conversation is all about how likely it is that you’re going to be stitched up by CCTV footage from Sainsbury’s (answer: not very likely at all) when the article makes it clear that it’s just an example of a system.I think the impact of this is much more likely to be on the day-to-day feelings and behaviour of people on benefits than on actual investigations. I have experienced the paranoia and it is horrible, corrosive, disabling, and discourages you from doing things that might promote your wellbeing
This can only get worse as we become more and more of a surveillance society.
And how do you know that, beyond your interminable hand wringing, many urbanites aren't doing exactly the same?No one on posting on this thread knows anything about what i am doing in RL, so less of that please
more of the helpful stuff, like tracking down info, FOI, tx
Does that ironing burn?No one on posting on this thread knows anything about what i am doing in RL, so less of that please
more of the helpful stuff, like tracking down info, FOI, tx
Say 30 cameras in store, open 0800-2200, 420 hours of footage, but can't watch in real time, maybe 4200 hours to go through it all. If you're lucky
Does that ironing burn?
You're spouting bollocks about what everyone else isn't doing, when you have no clue what they're doing.
Edit: great minds
Big Tom Said "I would expect that sainsbury's have at some point(s) been asked for and supplied footage to the dwp and that's why they are stated in the privacy policy. I doubt that anyone is sitting watching through store CCTV footage in case some claimant turns up that they can harass using it"
You really are a pompous, self-important cock, you know...i am not discussing regular posters on here,, please reply to the substantive points, that the above groups do not have the allies they need, it is not at all about individuals, its about resources, where they go, it is a political argument, Fridge Magnet and Co, can make it about race, call out/call me, reactionaries if he wants, but it is about where energies are put, why they are distributed that way, and why others miss out, for me, its about a hierarchy of oppression, something posters on here have satirised in other circumstances.
tx, big tom, that will be helpful.
I think the headline of the article is not done by the author, its more like you say, the pending FOI will help.