What's wrong with someone wanting to get a degree in that subject? What the fuck has it got to do with you?
Nothing at all provided you don't want me to pay for it
What's wrong with someone wanting to get a degree in that subject? What the fuck has it got to do with you?
Nothing at all provided you don't want me to pay for it
change the fucking recordNothing at all provided you dont want me to pay for it.
the corollary of which is, of course, that you wouldn't want to benefit from anything you've not contributed to.
I'll strike you a deal. You pay my mortgage I pay for somebodies degree in flower arranging. You will be OK with this as you don't mind not benefitting from it ?
i don't mind paying for things from which everyone benefits. and being as florists play a useful part in society i would not mind my money going to florists, doctors, historians, hell even the occasional land economist. but i'd be buggered with a fishfork before i pay a penny towards your mortgage (on which default would not cause me to lose a moment's sleep).I'll strike you a deal. You pay my mortgage I pay for somebodies degree in flower arranging. You will be OK with this as you don't mind not benefitting from it ?
I'll strike you a deal. You pay my mortgage I pay for somebodies degree in flower arranging. You will be OK with this as you don't mind not benefitting from it ?
I'll strike you a deal. You pay my mortgage I pay for somebodies degree in flower arranging. You will be OK with this as you don't mind not benefitting from it ?
One persons course ? I think you are missing the point. On purpose.
Interesting excluded middle there -- multinationals or jugglers and de'el take the rest.My focus is on materiality of tax revenues....not number of businesses. I don't think a the location of a thousand jugglers will count the same as one multinational who might be choosing where to be based.
Give or take large company tax take has fallen on average by £150 million a year over 12 years admittedly with wild oscillations but with recent behaviour when it is known that profits have been rising confirming the trend. - See more at: George Osborne’s £10 billion a year tax giveaway to big companies
What this means is that over a period of six years more than £30 billion is to be given away to big business to supposedly lure new business activity to the UK when there is no evidence that such a policy works. - See more at: George Osborne’s £10 billion a year tax giveaway to big companies
One persons course ? I think you are missing the point. On purpose.
Why are you up in arms about a tiny minority of courses in subjects you personally think are not worthwhile (although personally, I think that being qualified in floristry is about as commercially-focused as it comes) but you apparently don't give a damn that £4bn of your money every year has been given back to corporations, and that another £30bn is to be given back over the next six years?Nothing at all provided you don't want me to pay for it
It frustrates me as somebody who has actually spent many years studying finance and who works as a financial analyst when people spout out old tired neoliberal shite that conforms to a populist Tory narrative but has no basis in actual data. And then they tell us that pigs might fly when we suggest that change is possible. As if their view of the world has come about from their own personal study rather than having been handed to them by the populist narrative of the day. As if they wouldn't have believed a totally different story had that been the prevailing wisdom.I think this is where old Bazza goes quiet.
everyone else exempt from vat i suppose. or the duties levied on e.g. cigarettes and beer. or is indirect taxation not iyo taxation?there are less than 50m taxpayers
everyone else exempt from vat i suppose. or the duties levied on e.g. cigarettes and beer. or is indirect taxation not iyo taxation?
sadly no offie or pub offers me cashback on misapplied dutyYou're exempt from duty on beer, as are my kids.
sadly no offie or pub offers me cashback on misapplied duty
sometimes i do, i occasionally get some beers or spirits as presents for people and i don't shirk my round in the pub.you buying booze then?
Isn't floristry the sort of thing that the 'history is worthless just like the rest of the humanities' brigade would prefer people to be studying?
Oh dear.Should have googled it.... took me less than 30 seconds to find one Advanced Course Search - BA (Hons) Professional Floristry and Floral Design (Top-up)
Indeed. And the tendency of institutions to offer degree courses for occupations like this will thrive now that financial capital have harnessed the debt farm of tuition/maintenance loans. It's like private taxation for the right to learn a trade...neo-liberal genius.Probably. Higher Education can't win with those idiots. If it sticks to traditional academic subjects it's out of touch; if it tries to do something more vocational it's peddling 'Mickey Mouse degrees.' And either way it ends up on the receiving end of the argument that education is a private benefit and therefore the state shouldn't fund people's degrees, an argument as selfish as it is illiterate.
not sure anyone on the right really learns a tradeIt's like private taxation for the right to learn a trade...neo-liberal genius.
a stupid person, that's whoOh dear.
What sort of a person would confuse the entire discipline of floristry/design with the topic of flower arranging.
Come on Brogdale. Obviously there's more to floristry than just arranging the flowers but that's the post of a man/woman backed into a corner. Just admit you were wrong and move on.Oh dear.
What sort of a person would confuse the entire discipline of floristry/design with the topic of flower arranging.
I think this is where old Bazza goes quiet.
Careful now.a stupid person, that's who
Should have googled it.... took me less than 30 seconds to find one Advanced Course Search - BA (Hons) Professional Floristry and Floral Design (Top-up)