Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Stop the BNP's Nazi rally in Derbyshire on Saturday 15 August (Discussion)

So you're talking shit. Anti-fascism is about defending democracy, and at the same time you can build the sort of thing you are describing.

Nope, no idea what you're on about again. Defending neo-liberalism holding hands with labour and cameron and so on is not defending democracy, if you want to use that simplisitic slogan as your call to arms.
 
Nope, no idea what you're on about again. Defending neo-liberalism holding hands with labour and cameron and so on is not defending democracy, if you want to use that simplisitic slogan as your call to arms.
:D simplistic? You are the one who is simplistic, unable to understand you can defend and attack at the same time.

"bit complex for butchers tho "
 
Holding hands with labour and cameron is not defending anymore than the suggestiin to bring the trojan horse through the gates was a great defensive ploy.
 
Holding hands with labour and cameron is not defending anymore than the suggestiin to bring the trojan horse through the gates was a great defensive ploy.
And not drawing a distinction between the real fascists, and the "social fascists", was such a great defensive line for the communist party in Germany.

Do you consider the trade union social fascists as well? I mean, there's still funding the labour party.
 
Oh you understand.

I invite you, again, to say how holding hand with the architects and enforcers of neo-liberalism = defending democracy and how defending democracy in this manner is anti-fascist.
 
Oh you understand.

I invite you, again, to say how holding hand with the architects and enforcers of neo-liberalism = defending democracy and how defending democracy in this manner is anti-fascist.
I think you are too old and too stupid for need to start explaining to you the difference between the labour party and fascism.
 
Call me a racist rmp3, go on, you know you want to. Or a panda.

No way mate. I have every admiration for people like you. You are genuinely committed to what you believe in, and you genuinely want to create a better society. You just wrong in your methodology, and you're arrogant and elitist attitude.
 
Hating neo-liberalism and thinking that holding hands with those that enforce it, with those who produce the far-right is not elitism. You can't define my criticisms away that way.
 
I'vve made a specific criticism about your chosen tactics, please don't try and substitute yourself for everyone else -the w/c in particular. Substitutionism is bad.
 
An eloquent marxist defence of why it's essential to hold hands with labour, tory and lib-dem in defence of our way of life against those revolutionary bounders of the BNP who want to overthrow the system though. That extremist shit is bad.
 
Hating neo-liberalism and thinking that holding hands with those that enforce it, with those who produce the far-right is not elitism. You can't define my criticisms away that way.
no your arrogance and your elitism is nothing to do with that. Some of it is to do with your politics, but mostly seems to be in your nature.
 
An eloquent marxist defence of why it's essential to hold hands with labour, tory and lib-dem in defence of our way of life against those revolutionary bounders of the BNP who want to overthrow the system though. That extremist shit is bad.
Now you're just pretending to be stupid. You are more than capable of distinguishing between fascism and bourgeois democracy. I do not believe if you had a choice between the two, you would choose the former.
 
That's not the choice that we're faced with though is it? Please do not pretend that it is. If you think that it is then you're fucked. If that is the thinking of the UAF then they're even more fucked. You need a serious dose of reality.
 
That's not the choice that we're faced with though is it? Please do not pretend that it is. If you think that it is then you're fucked. If that is the thinking of the UAF then they're even more fucked. You need a serious dose of reality.
:D it is you who has the one dimensional politics. "The only form of defence, is to attack neo-liberalism." You claim to be a Marxist, but you can't see how they can both be part of the same process, defence and attack.
You dont think that the people who want to take "actions against them" can't take action in the real world "for dealing with the workplace and community issues that are producing electoral support for the far-right"?

Edited to add
And instead of fighting strawman I suggest you read this again http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=9521435&postcount=48
 
Om my god, for the last time, i'm not a marxist and have never claimed to be.

But please tell me how defending neo-liberalism is part of some dialectical later attack. Becasue the problem is, that the people arguing 'against them' are clearly and explicitly arguing against and rejecting those who you demand they hold hands with to 'defend democracy'.

And why ignore my question - do you realy think that this is the question that we're faced with - fascism or bourgeois democracy? An answer would go some way to clarifying your approach.
 
Why do idiots like you still still speak in defence of new labour?

The bnp may cause a few racist attacks .New labour carpet bombs entire communities in Iraq and afghanistan.

People like you make me laugh:D

Sorry to burst your bubble but new Labour are racist it dont matter how you try and skirt round the issue.

Go on tell me how new labour are not racist because blowing children to bits in Iraq and Afghanistan is different from racism in the uk.
this ^^^^ too fucking right .. the bnp are a distraction

eta actually NL arn't racist .. but their actions are worse than anything BNP will EVER achieve by a factor of a million ..
 
But before local people thought it was a good idea to protest? Butchersapron might be cool about hundreds of fascists having a party on his backdoorstep, but many ain't having it. Believe it or not, this is happening in peoples communities and they're objecting to it. The fact that UAF wants to hijack the protest shouldn't detract from the fact that the main protest of the day will be formed of local people defending their community.

What local groups are UAF working with? Why no mention in their literature?
thats fair enough
 
Hari Krishna.
But please tell me how defending neo-liberalism is part of some dialectical later attack. Becasue the problem is, that the people arguing 'against them' are clearly and explicitly arguing against and rejecting those who you demand they hold hands with to 'defend democracy'.
WTF was that gibberish.

And why ignore my question - do you realy think that this is the question that we're faced with - fascism or bourgeois democracy? An answer would go some way to clarifying your approach.
when you ask a question worth answering, and may do so.
 
Back
Top Bottom