No they wouldn’t. We still have players with hands beyond the ball in a contest, not supporting their own weight by kneeling on the player on the ground, handling on the ground until it’s noticed. It’s part of the game. It’s the cheek of it, that keeps us watching and shouting at the ref.
No they wouldn’t. We still have players with hands beyond the ball in a contest, not supporting their own weight by kneeling on the player on the ground, handling on the ground until it’s noticed. It’s part of the game. It’s the cheek of it, that keeps us watching and shouting at the ref.
Yes, absolutely jam packedHaha, a couple of jammy wins and this thread is full of Wales and the Lions.
Ireland have based their entire game plan on that for the last 30 years.No they wouldn’t. We still have players with hands beyond the ball in a contest, not supporting their own weight by kneeling on the player on the ground, handling on the ground until it’s noticed. It’s part of the game. It’s the cheek of it, that keeps us watching and shouting at the ref.
Zammit as a bolter, Henderson for sure....With two rounds played has anyone made a significant case for Lions inclusion? Some would've been in already (Hogg, Itoje), so the one who's stood out for me has been Wyn Jones.
Comedy doesn’t work for you.Ireland have based their entire game plan on that for the last 30 years.
There's also Flanquard the magnificently named French flanker. Talk about le determinisme nominative (sic)Remember Condon?
It was fact not humour.Comedy doesn’t work for you.
C'mon, I'll bite. Name your team, sir!I have a possible Lions team in my mind based on form in the first 2 rounds, not reputation, waiting for the Ireland game before confirming my thoughts. Current makeup is 6 Scots, 2 Irish, 3 Welsh, 4 English.
C'mon, I'll bite. Name your team, sir!
I think it's mostly fair based on form to date, though I'm not sure if AWJ has done enough to secure a test berth. He is sadly beginning to show his age.I’m going to regret this! slightly changed from my team of yesterday
As said this is based on what I’ve seen in individual positions in the first 2 games, I’ve not been thinking about past reputation, key partnerships, whether this is a team which could actually play together and make enough tackles, kick the goals etc. No South Africans in the team either...
Wyn Jones
Luke Cowan Dickie
Kyle Sinckler
Alun Wyn Jones
Jonny Gray
Hamish Watson
Tom Curry
Matt Fagerson
Ali Price
Finn Russell
Louis Rees-Zammit
Cameron Redpath
Garry Ringrose
Anthony Watson
Stuart Hogg
I think this team could do with someone really putting their hand up at 9, I was not 100% convinced on this call, not seen much competition especially at 9 but went for players who would know each other’s game. Price has had a few screw ups but also hasn’t let it go to his head.
Thoughts, rebukes and insults most welcome.
Unbelievable decision.Fagerson gets a longer ban than POM
It's interesting. Apparently he accepted it was foul play but disputed it was worthy of a red, therefore less time off for contrition. POM, on the other hand, whose act was malicious and premeditated and deserving of a much longer ban, obviously had better advice, did the so sorry, I admit it all, won't happen again line and got the result he wanted.Unbelievable decision.
With his elbow, trying to mask it from Barnes. Yeah, filthy fucker.Considering Fagerson was trying to clear out a, what do they call it nowadays, "jackaler?" & POM fucked into someone prone on their back.
I think the whole mitigation thing should be chucked out and that faux (or real) contrition at the hearing should count for nothing. If offence x is committed you have a window of y-z game ban, with y being reckless but not premeditated and z being malicious. No mitigation or mea culpas, none of this unblemished record stuff (POM, ffs!), just 'this many weeks and off you fucking toddle'POM is renowned for being a dirty player who will no doubt do it again. Not sure about Fagerson. Doesn’t seem fair somehow
Haha, a couple of jammy wins and this thread is full of Wales and the Lions.
Id rather see it changed to so many games off, rather than weeks. otherwise you get the crazy situation where due to suspension of games due to covid there were 10 week bans that didnt result in players missing any games at all. Get a 10 week ban in the last game of the season and you dont miss a game, crazy!I think the whole mitigation thing should be chucked out and that faux (or real) contrition at the hearing should count for nothing. If offence x is committed you have a window of y-z game ban, with y being reckless but not premeditated and z being malicious. No mitigation or mea culpas, none of this unblemished record stuff (POM, ffs!), just 'this many weeks and off you fucking toddle'
Yeah, can't remember the AB player who assaulted Bradley Davies from behind but that's exactly what happened. X week ban including pre season friendlies = no ban at allId rather see it changed to so many games off, rather than weeks. otherwise you get the crazy situation where due to suspension of games due to covid there were 10 week bans that didnt result in players missing any games at all. Get a 10 week ban in the last game of the season and you dont miss a game, crazy!
Progressive Rugby’ calls for significant changes to how game is played
Profound changes called for to protect the rugby-playing community from brain injury
Ireland and Lions prop Paul Wallace is one of a number of signatories to a letter from a group called ‘Progressive Rugby,’ who are calling for significant changes to the way the game is played and organised on a global basis.
The thrust of the letter to the chairman of World Rugby, Bill Beaumont, calls for more profound changes to take place to protect the rugby-playing community from brain injury, claiming it to be greatest threat to the game.
Beaumont wrote an open letter on December 17th last outlining how World Rugby holds player welfare as its number one priority at all levels after recent accounts of former players and their experiences.
In the tackle area, the group call for a review of “double teaming” players, where ball carriers are simultaneously hit by two players from the opposing side, the upper level of tackle height as well as a timely release of ball following the tackle. The group are also calling for limiting substitutes for injury only.
The current rule allows for tactical substitutions, where more than half the team are permitted to come on fresh, usually in the second half causing an imbalance between tired and fresh players.
“The problem you have is you play rugby and you get fatigued,” said Professor John Fairclough. “The analogy is if you have Joe Calzaghe in a boxing match with Bernard Hopkins and after eight rounds you bring in Roy Jones (to fight Calzaghe). You have disproportionate physical strength. That’s when you have a problem.”
Former England players, Simon Shaw, Steve Thompson, Kyran Bracken and James Haskell, current Welsh backrow Josh Navidi and former Welsh international Alix Popham, former Canadian international Jamie Cudmore and former Scotland international Rory Lamont have also signed up to the changes.
“Of course, they are,” said Haskell when asked if modern players are more at risk. “Look at the size they are. I think they are massively at risk. When I was playing, we were doing things out of fear not out of science. It’s a dangerous game, a contact sport. It is a game of who controls violence. You might not like it.”
Life on the line
Former Clermont player, Cudmore, spoke of “the club putting my life on the line” and cited “puking in Twickenham while getting stitched up and asked to go back on the field.”
Included too were medics Dr Barry O’Driscoll, Professors Fairclough and Bill Ribbans and well as British Labour Party MP Chris Bryant, chair of the all-party parliamentary group for acquired brain injury.
In returning to play following a head injury, the group are also seeking to extend the minimum number of days before a player is back on the pitch competing to at least three weeks as well as mandatory comprehensive screening as in other sports after recurrent concussions.
Post retirement player welfare is also addressed and the body advise that a concussion fund be established by World Rugby, that ownership of a player passport should be developed and a more empathetic relationship with insurers should be agreed.
Much attention has recently fallen on England’s 43-year-old former hooker Steve Thompson, who played in every game of the 2003 World Cup but cannot remember the final, which England won. Thompson has been diagnosed with early onset dementia and probable chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
Progressive Rugby have requested to speak with senior figures in World Rugby to discuss how they can work together to control an issue “that threatens the very future of our game”. They have also asked for an independent “broad church” of experts to appraise current research, risks, and protocols in the game.