Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Russia; pariah state watch

I sometimes wonder if the writers of things like this:

1647370958944.png
experience the same mild sense of schadenfreude at the worthlessness of the rouble as I do reading it. I'm not saying it makes me a good person... :hmm:

ETA: I can't let the rest of it go unremarked, though. She'll have to pay that fine in roubles, and for all I know, it's perhaps a pretty hefty fine. I imagine that more switched-on people than I have thought about the idea of crowdfunding it, but given the situation, that's got to be tricky.

But if there's some kind of defence organisation out there that can be supported, I'd certainly be glad to know where to send my money.
 
Probably but what would the intention be ?
The intention of what?

I am assuming the point of that Twitter bloke posting the graph was to suggest that not all that much of the world was involved in the sanctioning of Russia.

Which might be true, if you're talking in geographical terms. But, surely, what really matters is what proportion of the global economy is now involved in sanctioning them? It doesn't really matter in the slightest how much land mass they occupy. Case in point - Australia, bigger in area than Europe and the UK, but I'll bet the size of its economy is nothing like that of UK/EU. Which makes the geographical representation rather specious, beyond giving a rough idea how many countries might be or not be sanctioning.
 
The intention of what?

I am assuming the point of that Twitter bloke posting the graph was to suggest that not all that much of the world was involved in the sanctioning of Russia.

Which might be true, if you're talking in geographical terms. But, surely, what really matters is what proportion of the global economy is now involved in sanctioning them? It doesn't really matter in the slightest how much land mass they occupy. Case in point - Australia, bigger in area than Europe and the UK, but I'll bet the size of its economy is nothing like that of UK/EU. Which makes the geographical representation rather specious, beyond giving a rough idea how many countries might be or not be sanctioning.
Look I’m all for sanctions and I’m pleased that Portugal which is one of the poorer EU states , where I am, is taking action in that regards . I think Supine makes a sensible point . However the map does show that the sanctions aren’t world wide .
 
Look I’m all for sanctions and I’m pleased that Portugal which is one of the poorer EU states , where I am, is taking action in that regards . I think Supine makes a sensible point . However the map does show that the sanctions aren’t world wide .
Is anyone suggesting that they are worldwide? I've not seen that suggestion made anywhere.
 
I sometimes wonder if the writers of things like this:

View attachment 314529
experience the same mild sense of schadenfreude at the worthlessness of the rouble as I do reading it. I'm not saying it makes me a good person... :hmm:

ETA: I can't let the rest of it go unremarked, though. She'll have to pay that fine in roubles, and for all I know, it's perhaps a pretty hefty fine. I imagine that more switched-on people than I have thought about the idea of crowdfunding it, but given the situation, that's got to be tricky.

But if there's some kind of defence organisation out there that can be supported, I'd certainly be glad to know where to send my money.
Not really tbh, I see that sort of news with a sense of dread.
 
The intention of what?

I am assuming the point of that Twitter bloke posting the graph was to suggest that not all that much of the world was involved in the sanctioning of Russia.

Which might be true, if you're talking in geographical terms. But, surely, what really matters is what proportion of the global economy is now involved in sanctioning them? It doesn't really matter in the slightest how much land mass they occupy. Case in point - Australia, bigger in area than Europe and the UK, but I'll bet the size of its economy is nothing like that of UK/EU. Which makes the geographical representation rather specious, beyond giving a rough idea how many countries might be or not be sanctioning.
Not just economy but transaction flows tend to go through Europe and the US. If you are paying for something in USD it has to touch America at some point.
 
This is interesting


The headline is just a symbolic thing really but if you read further on you'll see that the motion also calls for quite strong practical measures:



Moved by the council leader and his deputy so not some crackpot thing that stands no chance of passing.
Passed unanimously today.

 
I originally posted about this on one of the Ukraine threads, however today I came across this short thread which leads me to believe it's not connected to the war. The first executive 'slit his wrists' 30/01/2022, so prior to hostilities. In any event though the whole thing looks to be really unsavoury:



 
I originally posted about this on one of the Ukraine threads, however today I came across this short thread which leads me to believe it's not connected to the war. The first executive 'slit his wrists' 30/01/2022, so prior to hostilities. In any event though the whole thing looks to be really unsavoury:




i think it's really weird but not sure where you get unsavoury from, which for me has connotations of sexual misconduct or moral turpitude
 
The Navalny documentary was really good on bbc2 tonight.

Includes Belincat on the investigation, and navalny phoning some of the kill team they identified as being sent to poison him. Eye opening.
 
Well the rhetoric from the West has hardened, attacks on logistical sites in Russia and the escalation continues. The one i heard recently was the UN will move peace keepers into Ukraine’s North and West. This frees up Ukraines own troops to reinforce the South and Eastern fronts. And secures supply lines.

 
Well the rhetoric from the West has hardened, attacks on logistical sites in Russia and the escalation continues. The one i heard recently was the UN will move peace keepers into Ukraine’s North and West. This frees up Ukraines own troops to reinforce the South and Eastern fronts. And secures supply lines.

Russia would surely be able to veto a UN peacekeeping force in Ukraine (?)
 
Russia would surely be able to veto a UN peacekeeping force in Ukraine (?)
Well they are a permanent member so i suppose so. But I suppose that can change as it’s increasingly isolated. I’m taking that assumption because of the change in aims to ‘keep Russia permanently weakened‘. I’m not an expert but if an internationally legal way could be found to do that it’d be a potential solution. Problem is it’d become a war were NATO is providing logistical support with the Ukrainian troops actually doing the fighting In the South/East.
 
Back
Top Bottom