Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Effects - current and potential of the worlds sanctions on Russia

My friend in shipping says that oil tankers are constantly busy at the moment taking Russian oil to India, and absolutely guaranteed 100% Indian oil on to the rest of the world
 
the stats speak for themselves, vague "pressure hasnt gone away" last line is BBC "balance".... the fact is sanctions have failed spectacularly, infact it has strengthened Russia and sped up their positioning as a semi-leader of the global south against the west...see what's happening in the Sahel for example. Where Russia isn't, China is. This is what inter-imperial competition looks like and they're doing pretty well at it.
You sound like this is a good thing.
 
the stats speak for themselves, vague "pressure hasnt gone away" last line is BBC "balance".... the fact is sanctions have failed spectacularly, infact it has strengthened Russia and sped up their positioning as a semi-leader of the global south against the west...see what's happening in the Sahel for example. Where Russia isn't, China is. This is what inter-imperial competition looks like and they're doing pretty well at it.
i wonder how many articles are out there demonstrating how successful sanctions have been. because i'm seeing things like Why Western sanctions against Russia have fallen short which agree with you.
 
I don't think it's really possible to see the economic effect of the sanctions until after the fact. The Russian government is pumping billions into the economy from reserves and printing rubles and this has quite a stimulating effect on the economy, even with sanctions in place. It's a great short term solution. The problem with these sorts of thing is that they work absolutely brilliantly right up to the moment when they don't. It's hard not to crash - hard - when the stimulus is taken away, and it obviously can't be continued forever. I think we have no idea how it's actually going in terms of long-term effects, and won't until some time after the war is finished. It's simply to volatile to predict.

The main takeaway is that the Russian economy is simply too large to bring to heel in the short term with just sanctions. They may very well work long term, but it's quite likely that the war will be over before the effects really bite. There's also a cultural question of just how much the Russian public will put up with - another thing that's just not known. North Korea proves that you can weather any kind of sanctions if you've brainwashed the populace well enough.

In terms of goals, it's not all economic warfare. Russia has been unable to ramp up production of higher-tech weaponry. They're not building top-rate tanks or aircraft any faster than they were previously, and many of those are going out with lower quality equipment than they did before the war. If they hadn't been able to rely on the Soviet inheritance, the Russian Army would be a skeleton by now. Yes, they can pump out shells for artillery, but they're actually raiding barrels that have been in store for decades to equip the artillery because they've not had enough fine machine tools to ramp up tube production. The Soviet inheritance is vast, but not limitless. Though it must seem that way to the poor Ukrainians. It's another piece that will work very well right up to the moment when it doesn't any more. If this and the economy had some sort of taper effect as they bottomed out, you might see the light at the end of the tunnel. But history shows these things usually just function perfectly well until they crash.
 
I don't think it's really possible to see the economic effect of the sanctions until after the fact. The Russian government is pumping billions into the economy from reserves and printing rubles and this has quite a stimulating effect on the economy, even with sanctions in place. It's a great short term solution. The problem with these sorts of thing is that they work absolutely brilliantly right up to the moment when they don't. It's hard not to crash - hard - when the stimulus is taken away, and it obviously can't be continued forever. I think we have no idea how it's actually going in terms of long-term effects, and won't until some time after the war is finished. It's simply to volatile to predict.

The main takeaway is that the Russian economy is simply too large to bring to heel in the short term with just sanctions. They may very well work long term, but it's quite likely that the war will be over before the effects really bite. There's also a cultural question of just how much the Russian public will put up with - another thing that's just not known. North Korea proves that you can weather any kind of sanctions if you've brainwashed the populace well enough.

In terms of goals, it's not all economic warfare. Russia has been unable to ramp up production of higher-tech weaponry. They're not building top-rate tanks or aircraft any faster than they were previously, and many of those are going out with lower quality equipment than they did before the war. If they hadn't been able to rely on the Soviet inheritance, the Russian Army would be a skeleton by now. Yes, they can pump out shells for artillery, but they're actually raiding barrels that have been in store for decades to equip the artillery because they've not had enough fine machine tools to ramp up tube production. The Soviet inheritance is vast, but not limitless. Though it must seem that way to the poor Ukrainians. It's another piece that will work very well right up to the moment when it doesn't any more. If this and the economy had some sort of taper effect as they bottomed out, you might see the light at the end of the tunnel. But history shows these things usually just function perfectly well until they crash.
is your suggestion then to just keep on the war forever until "it stops working" for Russia because its bound to come to a total collapse?
 
The turkey in the farm is convinced that his accommodation is perfect, with all the food he can eat and a habitat free from foxes, right up until December 24. Events don’t proceed linearly, they do so in big step changes.
 
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) will send staff to Moscow next week to review the Russian economy for the first time since the invasion of Ukraine, in a move that has prompted anger and dismay across European capitals.

Officials of the Washington-based organisation will travel to the Russian capital and meet “stakeholders” before publishing an assessment of the economy and providing recommendations about how the Kremlin might improve its economic handling and tackle issues such as the climate crisis.

After Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the IMF stopped its annual consultations with Russia. The organization said it was a “mutual obligation” to carry out an article IV review of a member country and that the process was only suspended because of the volatility of economic data. The situation in Russia was now “more settled”.

On Friday, nine European countries protested against the IMF’s plans, saying it would damage the reputation of the Washington-based fund to resume dialogue with a country that had invaded another.

“We would like to express our strong dissatisfaction with such IMF plans,” the finance ministers of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark, Norway and Poland said in a letter to the IMF managing director, Kristalina Georgieva, seen by Reuters.
 
Back
Top Bottom