RD2003
Got a really fucking shitty attitude
Correct. In my experience it was all corruption, with the strong arm boot boys not enforcing the old ideology with any enthusiasm, but looking for an 'in' with the corruption.These multi ethnic dictatorships did not have to end in the messy way they did. The trouble was that the ideological underpinnings of those states were morally bankrupt, any idealism was long dead. Nobody believed in them anymore. All that was left were strong arm boot boys, all corrupt, all with no ideas. China took the option of controlled violent repression of its minorities. They've got away with it partly because the Chineses overwhelmingly outnumbered its minorities. That was not true in the Soviet Union or Yugoslavia.
What could have headed off what is, inevitably in the light of what did take place, happening now, is a 'do it anyway to prevent the inevitable chaos' attitude on the part of those who still held power.
Radicals of all stripes would have had no less chance of an audience had things gone differently in the 1989-91 watershed than in what subsequently happened, not to mention in the developing (bogus) liberalism versus autocracy narrative, which will focus well-meaning but simple minds on supporting a fake liberalism that will in no way challenge our own rulers.
Last edited: