Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Rochester & Strood by-election

Prejudices exist in all classes - including elements of the w/c. Not that markers of class identity are markers of reactionary ideas.

Of course prejudices exist in all classes. That isn't the issue. The issue is that invariably the political classes, our Oxford PPEs, represent the working class as the exemplars of such prejudices, usually through reference to our "ignorance".
 
That isn't my view, I believe Labour can and should make a real difference. The real contempt is from people like Miliband who want to seem sympathetic to cultural markers of class identity whilst actively blocking policies which would demonstrate real respect.
You appear to be suggesting that there are those within the Labour party at high level who want more left wing policies & they are being blocked by Miliband & Balls etc or is there real division over this at top level? Whatever, Labour need to start spelling out policies now.
 
I used to have a neighbour who was a car dealer, he'd regularly have 10-15 cars for sale parked along the road. Didn't bother me as I don't drive but the rest of the street would be going bloody nuts :D

:D
My dad only did it one car at a time. That way he didn't get the local council breathing down his neck. :D
 
You don't even know what's really being discussed - nor did Thornberry - that's why it's been so revealing to those with eyes to see. And that includes Miliband. Imagine that, Miliband was more politically sussed than you, more tactically sussed than you, more in tune with what this idiocy meant in terms of his parties relationship with the w/c than you, and more honest about how widespread this cack is within your party than you.

And you're the red hot socialist.

So we've changed the definition of "red hot socialist" to actually mean "Fabian twat-monkey", have we? Why didn't I get the memo? :mad:
 
In that link you put up before it said he had put the flag up during the world cuand hadn't bothered to take it down. At what point did it stop signifying support for the England football team and start signifying the racism of the flag flyer? After the Uruguay game presumably.

This whole episode has reminded me of a bizarre conversation I had with someone this year. Someone I was speaking with was telling me how disappointed they were that so many people around wearing England shirts or had England flags, I assumed that they just really didn't like football and asked them if they were just sick of it. Nope, they thought that all these people wearing England shirts or who had England flags had them because they were just racists, nothing to do with the World Cup. I asked them whether people who aren't white people with England flags or England shirts were racists... they denied ever seeing anyone black or Asian with either. I asked them if they knew that the England team hadn't been 'all white' for a very, very long time. Nope, they seemed very sceptical about that.

It was at this point that I realised that this combination of ignorance, from someone who was obviously intelligent enough to do know better, was not about the intentions of football fans and football itself. It was wilful ignorance, a form of middle-class identity politics and an excuse to feel superior to 'chavs'.

This was the day after the WC, I think.
 
My facebook is littered with people defending Thornberry as a bastion against nationalism. I'm glad U75 is being more sensible.

John Rees' facebook utterances have been hilarious/disgusting over the past couple of days. He's on a one man (well, including the Caféless Counterfire so maybe one man and his dog) crusade to portray Thornberry as a socialist hero who has scored a victory over a latter day home counties Hitler.
 
Good illustration of Milliband's cluelessness even now. Asked what he though when he saw a white van outside a house with English flags on, he said he felt 'respect'. No he fuckin dosen't, nobody does. Its just a white van parked outside a house of a football fan. Whats to respect about that? its like saying you respect a lampost. What possesses a well educated politician with a degree in economics to come out with bollocks like that I really don't know. He is as clueless as Thornberry, a white van outside a house with flags on is just that, anybody who tries to present that as representing any stereotype of any sort is going to be considered a bit away with the fairies.
 
Good illustration of Milliband's cluelessness even now. Asked what he though when he saw a white van outside a house with English flags on, he said he felt 'respect'. No he fuckin dosen't, nobody does. Its just a white van parked outside a house of a football fan. Whats to respect about that? its like saying you respect a lampost. What possesses a well educated politician with a degree in economics to come out with bollocks like that I really don't know. He is as clueless as Thornberry, a white van outside a house with flags on is just that, anybody who tries to present that as representing any stereotype of any sort is going to be considered a bit away with the fairies.
Can you really not decode what he said? The basic message of respect peoples interests/fears/etc until they prove to themselves to be knobs - don't start by writing them off. He wasn't saying respect the van or respect the flag ffs - he was saying start off respecting that person and this thornberry had not.
 
Can you really not decode what he said? The basic message of respect peoples interests/fears/etc until they prove to themselves to be knobs - don't start by writing them off. He wasn't saying respect the van or respect the flag ffs - he was saying start off respecting that person and this thornberry had not.
Well cheers for explaining that ba, most potential Labour voters, myself included would might just think it was rather odd to say that they respect a white tranny. Which leads neatly back to what I metioned earlier about good speech making. If a politician wants to explain policies or anything else, they need to do it clearly & not expect people to 'decode' anything.
 
Can you really not decode what he said? The basic message of respect peoples interests/fears/etc until they prove to themselves to be knobs - don't start by writing them off. He wasn't saying respect the van or respect the flag ffs - he was saying start off respecting that person and this thornberry had not.
He specifically said, I see a white van, I think "respect". You are leaping to his defence becausd/ even though he has fucked up and given credence to the idea that Labour has a problem with class snobbery. We don't, we have an intolerance of parties appealing to the racism of an element of the white working class. Or some of us - like Thornberry do. Others like Milibands mate Glassman want to play up to it.
 
He specifically said, I see a white van, I think "respect". You are leaping to his defence becausd/ even though he has fucked up and given credence to the idea that Labour has a problem with class snobbery. We don't, we have an intolerance of parties appealing to the racism of an element of the white working class. Or some of us - like Thornberry do. Others like Milibands mate Glassman want to play up to it.
You'll link to this specific quote then won't you. No you won't because it didn't happen. He was asked

what goes through his mind when he sees a white van outside a house with england flags?

To which he replied:

Well, what goes through my mind is that you respect...respect is the basic rule of politics

Are you so out of the loop that you think like some trot liberal that he's using respect as in street respect - or is it more likely he means respect in the sense i explained above. He did not say what you claim at all.
 
He specifically said, I see a white van, I think "respect".
The point was this was obviously bollocks, Ed no more thinks that than anybody else, it was a stupid thing to say because nobody sees a white van & thinks 'I respect that icon of the British w/c'. The term 'white van man' was coined as a derogatory term due to the often inconsiderate driving of some van drivers iirc, it has nothing to do with w/c values. Fact is, a white van is just that, nobody sees it as representing anything, they just swear when they get cut up by one. Ed simply is not sharp, he is not good at delivering off the cuff oneliners & this was nearly as bad as Thornberry's tweet because it just compounds how out of touch they are in their politically elite bubble.

Trouble is Ed cannot make himself what he is not, he might have ability perhaps, but he needs other Labour MPs who do have more ability to connect, there must be some?
 
If i see a house draped in english flags (outside of world cup time) i do think "wanker". is that really terrible of me? it just comes from my real life experiences, and i'll still give people the benefit of the doubt... just that will be my gut feeling.
 
If i see a house draped in english flags (outside of world cup time) i do think "wanker". is that really terrible of me? it just comes from my real life experiences, and i'll still give people the benefit of the doubt... just that will be my gut feeling.
Ive got a mexican flag in our window tho, no problema with that.
Here's a pic I took in Hamburg. What now. :confused:

hamburg fleg.jpg
 
Flying flags from houses does seem slightly popular at the moment, around where I live in Essex anyway. Often they are draped in the window & some larger houses have flagpoles. Its normal in other countries. Holland for example where flags are flown on certain days. Many houses there have fitting on front wall to put a flagpole.
 
If i see a house draped in english flags (outside of world cup time) i do think "wanker". is that really terrible of me? it just comes from my real life experiences, and i'll still give people the benefit of the doubt... just that will be my gut feeling.
Is dealing in stereotypes ever a productive way of thinking? I've hung an England flag from my window, I've driven a van for a living, I've lived in a terraced house in a provincial town.

What exactly does that snapshot say about me, my life and my ideas about the world?

(there's a power dimension when an MP does it too...)
 
Is dealing in stereotypes ever a productive way of thinking? I've hung an England flag from my window, I've driven a van for a living, I've lived in a terraced house in a provincial town.

What exactly does that snapshot say about me, my life and my ideas about the world?

(there's a power dimension when an MP does it too...)
me making assumptions about people who drape their houses in england flags outside of world cup times has probably kept me out of aggro situations. ignoring my instincts on this has got me into aggro situations once or twice.

agreed would be bad news politically for an mp to make such assumptions, tho the assumptions have all been inferred from a single photo rather than from her actually saying anything.
 
Butchersapron is desperately attempting to defend Miliband's absurd stance because his stupid panicked reaction to a tweet is "proof" of a myth that it is useful for the far right and workerist ultra-left to peddle.
 
Butchersapron is desperately attempting to defend Miliband's absurd stance because his stupid panicked reaction to a tweet is "proof" of a myth that it is useful for the far right and workerist ultra-left to peddle.
He's only going to get worse as the night gets older folks...keep digging though articul8 - enjoying it.
 
Back
Top Bottom