Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
And everyone else will think you're being somewhat mysteriousBBC news now referring to these men as the Rochdale 9.....made me shiver...those that know me and Ayatollah will understand....
And everyone else will think you're being somewhat mysteriousBBC news now referring to these men as the Rochdale 9.....made me shiver...those that know me and Ayatollah will understand....
And everyone else will think you're being somewhat mysterious
Barking_Mad said:CPS apparently turned this case down back in 2008 as they said one of the girls involved wasnt a "credible witness".
The strange calculus the CPS use to decide whether witnesses are credible means that at the least hundreds of abuse cases, on children, the elderly and people with learning disabilities aren't prosecuted because the case isn't an "easy win".
Sorry for that...When we were arrested Dec 80(fuck me thats way back) a support committee was set up...'The Rochdale 9 Defence Campaign...a few months later it was reduced to 8 as one of the number thought he could go it alone.(Didnt work ..he got the same) Coincidentally one of the defence barristers in the trial at Liverpool was a solicitor for us.I think BigNose makes a reference to the Rochdale 9 in No Retreat
Sorry for that...When we were arrested Dec 80(fuck me thats way back) a support committee was set up...'The Rochdale 9 Defence Campaign...a few months later it was reduced to 8 as one of the number thought he could go it alone.(Didnt work ..he got the same) Coincidentally one of the defence barristers in the trial at Liverpool was a solicitor for us.
I think that's right, which is why in my earlier post I took the emphasis away from these particular offenders to look at violence towards women in general. It's about attitudes towards women, and, ultimately, power. However, we do have to superimpose the particular cultural aspects of this case back onto the picture if we want to see what's actually happening here and whether it might happen again. It is that question that many people seem to flinch away from. I think largely because of the way the discourse on race has been conducted in our society in the last decade and more; there is a conflation between race and culture. To be absolutely clear: there is no racial explanation for the way these men acted, but there might be a cultural one.I also think you'll find the views of serial sexual abusers is one of their victims being worthless per se and its not unique to Pakistani offenders like this.
Guardian not allowing any comments on the issue on CIF?
I do 39 and it was called 'All our Tommorows'..by Ted Allbeury...every time as a bit of a gimmick when I was out shopping I'd go into any nearby 2nd hand bookshop, which I do frequently and if I came across a copy of it I buy it...Ive got 12 now....kinda silly I know. The other thing is although there are several 2nd hand copies of NR on Amazon Ive never spotted one in a 2nd hand bookshop/charity shop/car boot et al. Was told that when that happens youve made it...well thats bollox Im sure....remind me 39 were we simultaneously The Junction and Red Lion Vets...??Do you remember that odd time, when you were playing and I was managing The Junction, and we had an away game somewhere and you went for a scout round the shops and found that book with a reference to the trial in it?
No it is not as simple as that. British Pakistani's come from different parts of Pakistan, so rather than just say of Pakistani origin. I wanted to be more specific than that. Mirpur is one of the most backward parts of Pakistan, so it is worth mentioning.Isn't it fair to say, though, that the majority of British Pakistanis have their origins in the Mirpur region, so that the majority of groomers deriving their heritage from there would be a foregone conclusion?
Would it be fair to characterise the situation like this? : Paeodophilia is a crime committed within all races and cultures, but the particular form that the crime takes often differs along cultural/societal lines. Institutional paedophilia (for example in the catholic church), or sex tourism (Garry Glitter types going to Thailand, etc) is primarily a white phenomena, whereas street-grooming gangs are primarily Asian.
Furthermore, the make-up of the victims is shaped by the cultural and social situations that are existent at the time and place. So given that the pool of vulnerable women available to this grooming gang was mostly white, white girls were disproportionately victimised as a result. Similarly, if we take paedo-tourism, the crime can be seen as being relatively powerful white men taking advantage of vulnerable Asian women in their home country.
I certainly believe that an understanding of the social and cultural dynamics is neccessary to tackle the problem, but a narrative needs to be formed in the mainstream that is balanced, non-divisive, and productive. If this narrative is not formed, then the far-right will take advantage of this issue to push their agenda.
Also, I would like to say that explanation is not the same as justification. Explanation is a good thing as it can help resolve an ongoing situation; justification amounts to moral cowardice. Sticking our heads in the sand is also not an option.
while this is a good analysis, one could ask if there have been cases of asian male gangs grooming young asian women, I know there are many caveats, such young women are more protected by the wider family/community, etc, but it still could happen, so has it been?..
No it is not as simple as that. British Pakistani's come from different parts of Pakistan, so rather than just say of Pakistani origin. I wanted to be more specific than that. Mirpur is one of the most backward parts of Pakistan, so it is worth mentioning.
Most of the Mirpur folk settled in the Midlands and North of England. Whilst the Pakistanis in London come from all sorts of areas of Pakistan.
This makes me think it is more a Mirpuri issue as there are less 'Pakistani gang grooming cases' in London and the South-correct me if I am wrong..
...young chap.
while this is a good analysis, one could ask if there have been cases of asian male gangs grooming young asian women, I know there are many caveats, such young women are more protected by the wider family/community, etc, but it still could happen, so has it been?..
As I said earlier in the thread, there may well be such cases, but the dynamics of some communities (Pakistani or otherwise, Muslim or otherwise) means that it's very difficult to find out if abuse takes place within them.
Mohammed Shaffique said:“They think that white teenage girls are worthless and can be abused without a second thought”.
There's also a level of contempt for the lifestyle of western women among some Asians which is also likely to be a factor in them primarily targeting white girls.
Where is the cultural difference?
I think that's right, which is why in my earlier post I took the emphasis away from these particular offenders to look at violence towards women in general. It's about attitudes towards women, and, ultimately, power. However, we do have to superimpose the particular cultural aspects of this case back onto the picture if we want to see what's actually happening here and whether it might happen again. It is that question that many people seem to flinch away from. I think largely because of the way the discourse on race has been conducted in our society in the last decade and more; there is a conflation between race and culture. To be absolutely clear: there is no racial explanation for the way these men acted, but there might be a cultural one.
It's not just the right that does that. Multiculturalism does that. That's its purpose.especially given the right's tendency to equate Pakistani and Muslim as though though both were an expression of a single cultural type.
Greater Manchester police apologised to the victims of the recent case, saying that now that they know more about this type of crime they would conduct future investigations differently. And yet those of us who are involved in the attempt to combat child sexual exploitation have known about these men and the way they operate for decades. The victims have told us. Why have they been sidelined once again in favour of a good old ruck about race?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/09/victims-sex-gangs-complacency-ethnicity
There probably are specific cultural reasons which influence the chosen MO, but they are very unlikely to turn a man into a sexual predator when he wouldn't otherwise have been. Misogyny is not unique to Pakistani men, and neither are rape and trafficking.i should clarify that obviously the white community is not blameless, but they aren't organised and don't act homogeneously in the same way
trying to be fair minded as i can about this i can't help but be continually appalled by their "culture". amongst young Pakistani men there is an incredible amount of machismo, bigotry and intolerance - in particular relating to 'Western sluts'. this is also not a minority phenomenon, white girls are seen as fair game for any treatment and lower than animals.
Interesting, hope not hates split with the uaf/swp was in large part over how to deal with the keighly grooming (the latter arguing it wasa racist conspiracy against Muslims).
But is it so unlike (often white) groups of professional footballers getting involved in gang rapes, or black gangs in London? It has at least as much to do with the values of young men and how they see women. And in this context the rise of near ubiquitous internet porn must have something to do with it? Which isn't to say that we shouldn't look at the particular ways this expresses itself in certain sections of Pakistani youth (though you need to be careful not to allocate it to "the (sic) Pakistani community", still less muslim men in general. Any more than paedo priests is a problem for "the white community" as a whole to deal with.