Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Rochdale grooming trial: Nine men jailed

The debate needs to take place within the Muslim community. The debate needs to be about the role of women. In order to have helped these girls, it would need to have taken place a long time ago. In order to help current and future girls and women, it needs to take place now.

We have a choice. We can leave this to the far right, in which case we can be assured that stereotypes will be employed. Or we can ask the right questions the right way.

In Holland the Dutch Socialist Party have indeed asked these sorts of questions and are growing in popularity, upto 20% in the latest polls, I haven't looked at Socialist Unity say yet but i can guess their perspective...
 
CPS apparently turned this case down back in 2008 as they said one of the girls involved wasnt a "credible witness".

There is a subtext much of the media is reporting is that the CPS were concerned about 'offending sensibilities' this was perhaps at the height of N/L state multi-culturalism where anything could be and often was, construed as racist, etc...
 
So what if they were vulnerable girls. Does that mean they can be raped, trafficked and threatened with violence?

What next – “she’s a prostitute so it doesn’t matter if she’s raped”. “She was wearing a short skirt so she was asking it”.

I don’t care how vulnerable someone is, what their background is - they have an absolute right not be abused in this or any other way. Full stop.

They way some people are talking (especially in some parts of the media) is coming very close to blaming the victims.

Anyone who seeks to excuse, mitigate, or even contextualise, this type of behaviour should hang their heads in shame.

As for the sentences - laughable.
 
So what if they were vulnerable girls. Does that mean they can be raped, trafficked and threatened with violence?

What next – “she’s a prostitute so it doesn’t matter if she’s raped”. “She was wearing a short skirt so she was asking it”.

I don’t care how vulnerable someone is, what their background is - they have an absolute right not be abused in this or any other way. Full stop.

They way some people are talking (especially in some parts of the media) is coming very close to blaming the victims.

Anyone who seeks to excuse, mitigate, or even contextualise, this type of behaviour should hang their heads in shame.

As for the sentences - laughable.
Wasn't there some hoo hah that some 'community leader' had basically blamed the girls families for not keeping an eye on them enough. Like Stoat Boy did in fact.
 
Wasn't there some hoo hah that some 'community leader' had basically blamed the girls families for not keeping an eye on them enough. Like Stoat Boy did in fact.

I'm not sure he said that, in fact perhaps remarkably he said he feels some culpability for what happened , more than most people would do...
 
Wasn't there some hoo hah that some 'community leader' had basically blamed the girls families for not keeping an eye on them enough. Like Stoat Boy did in fact.

To be honest I think that the adult who was deemed to have been any of the 'responsible adult' for any of the girls involved should have questions asked of them because as far as I am concerned its obvious that these girls had nobody really looking out for them. Maybe its an unfashionable view on here but adults do have a duty of care towards kids in their charge and that includes making sure that they aint in a position for bastards like this to exploit them.
 
Yes.. but it wasn't them that did the raping and grooming.
I'd like to think I'd know where my teenage children were at all times, but can't help wondering if the reality is really going to work like that.
 
Yes.. but it wasn't them that did the raping and grooming.

I'd like to think I'd know where my teenage children were at all times, but can't help wondering if the reality is really going to work like that.

I bet you know where they are after 10pm at night.
 
Blaming the parents of the kids being abused is looking the wrong way imo. What about the guys that did the grooming, what about looking into their upbringing that made them think this was ok?
 
Stoat Boy said:
To be honest I think that the adult who was deemed to have been any of the 'responsible adult' for any of the girls involved should have questions asked of them because as far as I am concerned its obvious that these girls had nobody really looking out for them. Maybe its an unfashionable view on here but adults do have a duty of care towards kids in their charge and that includes making sure that they aint in a position for bastards like this to exploit them.

More 'unfashionable views'. I can see why no one would hold such abhorrent views other than you.
 
so it's clearly a very complex issue with lots of differents perspectives all playing off against each other. not easy to resolve.
 
Wasn't there some hoo hah that some 'community leader' had basically blamed the girls families for not keeping an eye on them enough. Like Stoat Boy did in fact.

Yes. In fact the solicitor for the leader of the gang, who received 19 years, said his client believed "society failed the girls in this case before the girls even met [him] and now that failure is being blamed on a weak minority group".

Avoiding responsibility by blaming someone else, and playing the race card, in one go. Nice.
 
I think it's part of the misogyny inherent in some men in Muslim communities. Sure, it may be white girls being groomed and raped, but their own daughters fare little better when they can be murdered for something as trivial as having a boyfriend in an honour killing. It's sexism rather than racism, imo.
 
Yes. In fact the solicitor for the leader of the gang, who received 19 years, said his client believed "society failed the girls in this case before the girls even met [him] and now that failure is being blamed on a weak minority group".

Avoiding responsibility by blaming someone else, and playing the race card, in one go. Nice.

What a fucking cunt of a solicitor. Needs a slap.
 
Wasn't there some hoo hah that some 'community leader' had basically blamed the girls families for not keeping an eye on them enough. Like Stoat Boy did in fact.

I don't know about that, but there were two rochdale councillors who gave character references for the accused during the trial.
 
Yes. In fact the solicitor for the leader of the gang, who received 19 years, said his client believed "society failed the girls in this case before the girls even met [him] and now that failure is being blamed on a weak minority group".

If it wasn't so sad, it would be laughable.

Who was the weakest minority here, the poor young girls from the care sector, or the grown men that knew exactly what they were doing?
 
Well thank fuck these animals have been caught and locked up, shame a capital sentence isn't possible. This sort of thing has been going on for too long and it's shocking that one of the victims wasn't taken seriously when she first reported it. But then again nor was Ann Cryer.
 
How come one of the convicted men didn't have to attend sentencing because he said the judge was racist? I didn't think it was voluntary
 
Back
Top Bottom