bi0boy
Power User
just out now: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/cabinet-office
anything juicy or damp squibb
anything juicy or damp squibb
but what do you think?
i thought you might have an opinion to share with usI can't read all the correspondence in 2 minutes. It has only just been published.
i thought you might have an opinion to share with us
i've opinions on lots of things i haven't read eg anything by jane austen. not having read something is a frivolous excuse for not having an opinion on something.An opinion on something I haven't read yet? No thanks.
i've opinions on lots of things i haven't read eg anything by jane austen. not having read something is a frivolous excuse for not having an opinion on something.
..and there was no need to start a thread..there was a perfectly good one running.Ok sorry I will try and make up some bollocks the next time I start a thread about something that has been published in the last two minutes.
or maybe if you feel so strongly that you should have read stuff before you can offer an opinion why not read the stuff before starting the thread?Ok sorry I will try and make up some bollocks the next time I start a thread about something that has been published in the last two minutes.
& quite likely a better informed one too...and there was no need to start a thread..there was a perfectly good one running.
sea birds are big at the GrauniadSo the Guardian pursued a ten year legal battle to get these letters published..
As we trawl through the cache of correspondence, it’s becoming clear that Prince Charles wrote to ministers almost exclusively on matters that are well known to be his closely-held personal interests.
Farming, the environment, armed forces, supermarkets, architecture, schools, Prince’s Foundation projects, badger culling and even Patagonian toothfish and albatrosses.
If there was anything explosive we'd know by now.
(((Badgers)))Big fan of the albatross, not so keen on badgers.
Charles comes out of them quite well
The spokesman said: “The PM’s view around the importance of there being confidential correspondence between the Government and the sovereign and the heir to the throne.
“There is some degree of lack of clarity with regard to a slightly distinct areas of the exercise of the ministerial veto which is in FOI [rules].
“Given that the court ruling has generated a degree of uncertainty in this area this is an issue which the Government will look at and consider carefully and thoroughly.”
The spokesman said it was too early to say whether the changes would require legislation.
Oddly enough I was reading about Patagonian toothfish this morning. They are a major part of the diet of the colossal squid. http://squid.tepapa.govt.nz/anatomy/article/how-the-colossal-squid-feeds
Charles comes out of them quite well
Big fan of the albatross, not so keen on badgers.
Oddly enough I was reading about Patagonian toothfish this morning. They are a major part of the diet of the colossal squid. http://squid.tepapa.govt.nz/anatomy/article/how-the-colossal-squid-feeds
The colossal squid is not the same as the giant squid obviously
"I have the honour to be, Sir, Your Royal Highness's most humble and obedient servant".
So the Guardian pursued a ten year legal battle to get these letters published..