As I thought every six months, "The Captains Regent are not heads of government, but only heads of state without executive power" Captains Regent - WikipediaEveryone gets a go!
The nature of a system will depend on a country's various political and social legacies. So in Switzerland as a relatively loose confederation, a council makes sense. Here, by far the easiest way to get rid of the monarchy would be to change to an Ireland/Germany-style system. A directly elected president with no executive power. Quite aside from it not necessarily being desirable, a switch to a France or US style system would involve upending the whole parliamentary system.
In San Marino, of course, it's more like being a glorified Town Mayor. Nice salary, though.As I thought every six months, "The Captains Regent are not heads of government, but only heads of state without executive power" Captains Regent - Wikipedia
Fake. Too much hair.
From the linkThe last four pages have not been very informative about whether he's dead or not! This article seems to rather boringly suggest that nothing's happened:
King Charles conspiracy theory takes internet by storm
Morbid speculation about the British monarch followed a seemingly baseless rumor about an imminent major announcement on the BBC.www.newsweek.com
Lizards have scalesNewsweek understands the king is this week continuing with his scaled-down duties, as has been the case since his cancer diagnosis.
The last four pages have not been very informative about whether he's dead or not! This article seems to rather boringly suggest that nothing's happened:
King Charles conspiracy theory takes internet by storm
Morbid speculation about the British monarch followed a seemingly baseless rumor about an imminent major announcement on the BBC.www.newsweek.com
Can't someone just open the box he's in and have a look?These things aren’t binary. It’s looking more and more likely that he’s a little bit dead, and perhaps getting deader by the day.
Memento Boring GuyWell..its a dead cert that he is going to die.
Can't someone just open the box he's in and have a look?
If you have to ask the question on an internet forum then no he's not dead yet.The last four pages have not been very informative about whether he's dead or not! This article seems to rather boringly suggest that nothing's happened:
King Charles conspiracy theory takes internet by storm
Morbid speculation about the British monarch followed a seemingly baseless rumor about an imminent major announcement on the BBC.www.newsweek.com
Like Shrodinger's cat..These things aren’t binary. It’s looking more and more likely that he’s a little bit dead, and perhaps getting deader by the day.
I notice that they've now pulled the post on Telegram.This just came up on my Telegram...but I can't find any corroboration anywhere else.
View attachment 416369
Because otherwise the PM becomes HoS.I don’t understand the question. Do you mean were Johnson elected non executive president? Then what would stop him is that it’s a ceremonial post without the powers to do anything.
Personally, I wouldn’t have any such thing. We don’t need a monarchy. If you have something that isn’t needed, once rid it it, why would you replace it?
Simple answer to that problem, just get rid of the state and then you don't need a head of it. Job's a good 'un.Because otherwise the PM becomes HoS.
Some slimy deviant like Boris or hopeless incompetent like Truss.
I'd rather have a lettuce.
....once they've finished their copy of photoshop for dummiesAll the conspiracy nuts reckoning that he's carked and it's being covered up are not asking the key question of why would they cover it up? Kings are completely interchangeable. There's a replacement in the wings ready to step in and take up any waving and signing that needs to be done.
Seem to be a ridiculous number of 'announcement due' type messages on X over last couple of days. Any idea why it's suddenly snowballed?
Simple answer to that problem, just get rid of the state and then you don't need a head of it. Job's a good 'un.
Well, depends what he died of. If he's died of cancer that's one thing, if it turns out Diana actually survived the assassination attempt and has just returned to get her revenge after about 25 years spent hiding in the French countryside that's a bit more embarrassing.All the conspiracy nuts reckoning that he's carked and it's being covered up are not asking the key question of why would they cover it up? Kings are completely interchangeable. There's a replacement in the wings ready to step in and take up any waving and signing that needs to be done.
Newsweek is a right wing conspiracy site according to the SPLC so we should assume something has very definitely happened.The last four pages have not been very informative about whether he's dead or not! This article seems to rather boringly suggest that nothing's happened:
King Charles conspiracy theory takes internet by storm
Morbid speculation about the British monarch followed a seemingly baseless rumor about an imminent major announcement on the BBC.www.newsweek.com
Hell hath no fury...Well, depends what he died of. If he's died of cancer that's one thing, if it turns out Diana actually survived the assassination attempt and has just returned to get her revenge after about 25 years spent hiding in the French countryside that's a bit more embarrassing.