bluescreen
tofu eating wokerati
Thangam Debbonaire smashing it.
She is so angry.
She is so angry.
Well done herThangam Debbonaire smashing it.
She is so angry.
Thangam Debbonaire smashing it.
She is so angry.
"debate"If anyone is interested, the debate on the clown in the commons is about to start.
And his supportersPleased to hear my MP, the Father of the House Sir Peter Bottomley, will be supporting the report.
The more senior Tories doing that, the more it'll piss off Johnson.
You call her "thick" but read this and you might need to reappraise your assessment of her intellect?First Tory to speak in support on Johnson, someone called Lia Nici, who you may ask, I certainly did.
It's some thick back bencher, who apparently served as an Assistant Government Whip for about a month from Sept. to Oct. 2022, LOL, that was under Truss, extra LOLs, who can't see any evidence in the report that Johnson lied to the house, what a fuckwit.
He needs to go specsaversThe Minster for the 18th Century also can't see any evidence in the report that Johnson lied to the house, but we all know he's a total fuckwit anyway.
I am so looking forward to him losing his seat at the next GE.
He needs to go specsavers
He needs to go specsavers
absolute joke of a country why are they even voting on this what for ?
They don't have to vote, it's only if someone insists.absolute joke of a country why are they even voting on this what for ?
What is ‘concludes the matter’?Because it's important that parliament, not the government, concludes the matter, as it was parliament that set-up the inquiry.
MonoclesrusHe needs to go specsavers
What?What is ‘concludes the matter’?
I see. Haven’t been following closely, but it’s like a jury saying yes or no is the report correct, do we agree with the facts in it. Or do we not like the facts.What?
The privileges committee only investigates and reports back to the house with its recommendations, it wouldn't be right for just seven members to be the final judge and find a MP guilty, it needs a majority in the house, as the jury, to do that.
Well she probably will work full time and use fact she is a lord to help her get work.
I see. Haven’t been following closely, but it’s like a jury saying yes or no is the report correct, but most of the tories will abstain, unlike a jury.
Not really; Parliament tasked the committee to produce the report, so it is entirely appropriate for Parliament to pass or reject their findings. Certainly no more ridiculous than many of the guff that goes on in Westminster, and anything that causes the vermin more discomfort gets the thumbs-up from me.I see. Haven’t been following closely, but it’s like a jury saying yes or no is the report correct, do we agree with the facts in it. Or do we not like the facts.
But most of the tories will abstain, unlike a jury? And the consequence now of the outcome of the vote is what, whether he gets a members pass ?
It just looks ridiculous. A waste of time.
Who decides whether they vote or not then?Looking forward to the voting lists if there is a division.
The speaker I thinkWho decides whether they vote or not then?
There'll be a "all those in favour" call at the end.Who decides whether they vote or not then?