Because...Have any historians started erasing the cunt from all the history books yet? They need to eradicate all evidence that he ever existed.
Because hes a cunt.Because...
And we should remove cunts from the historical record why?Because hes a cunt.
In the case of cunts who's entire cuntery aims at their prominent inclusion in the historical record, there must surely be a case.And we should remove cunts from the historical record why?
If only serene would make itIn the case of cunts who's entire cuntery aims at their prominent inclusion in the historical record, there must surely be a case.
And we should remove cunts from the historical record why?
It's tempting but Boris Cuntface is the perfect example of why we shouldn't ignore the mistakes made throughout history.In the case of cunts who's entire cuntery aims at their prominent inclusion in the historical record, there must surely be a case.
Particularly as, according to this source, his MO was to shred any incriminating evidence; we wouldn't want to help in his endeavour.It's tempting but Boris Cuntface is the perfect example of why we shouldn't ignore the mistakes made throughout history.
We really should never forget how awful people like him can be, especially when it comes to future elections.In the case of cunts who's entire cuntery aims at their prominent inclusion in the historical record, there must surely be a case.
It's tempting but Boris Cuntface is the perfect example of why we shouldn't ignore the mistakes made throughout history.
Thinking ThatcherWell, if we'd erased Churchill, no-one could have tried to immitate him. That's all I'm saying.
Ah, but important social phenomena can be learnt from their activities:In the case of cunts who's entire cuntery aims at their prominent inclusion in the historical record, there must surely be a case.
I was tempted to add the 'Wow' smiley to that, but it's not a case of 'Wow', it's a case of 'might've known'.A cover-up eh? Who would have guessed?
Johnson under fire as Partygate documents 'shredded' weeks before Covid inquiry
Boris Johnson is facing accusations of covering up Partygate evidence. The former PM also allegedly joked that a Downing Street party during lockdown was 'the most unsocially distanced' in the UKwww.mirror.co.uk
He blocked my drive with his car.If only serene would make it
Fucking poundshop auric goldfinger
Apart fro favours and bribery, I can't think why somone with Johnson's wealth needs to borrow £800,000, possibly tax avoidance. That said, is he that much of a bad risk that he needs a guarantor. Don't the bank's trust him either.
No conflict of interest thereLabour has asked the watchdog for public appointments to examine the recruitment process after it was reported Richard Sharp helped Johnson with his personal finances during the interview process for the role at the corporation.
The Sunday Times said Sharp, a former Goldman Sachs banker, was involved in helping to sort out a guarantee on a loan worth up to £800,000 for Johnson in late 2020.
While the loan guarantee was itself given by Sam Blyth, a Canadian businessman and distant cousin of Johnson, the report said Sharp had helped with the arrangement, including having a conversation with Simon Case, the cabinet secretary.
You assume he pays the child support???is he all that wealthy?
the child support payments alone must be a fairly substantial sum...
You assume he pays the child support???