NOIf Starmer carks it can we have him back?
Oof. I'm slightly reminded of the excoriating dismantling of Margaret Thatcher by Geoffrey Howe, that got dismissed as "being savaged by a sheep". The fact is that Howe DID savage Thatcher, and to ultimately good effect. We can only hope this savaging achieves something similar. It won't turn the issue around, but it might at least start paving the way for Johnson's departure.
Fighting talkYes totally - I'm assuming Corbyn wouldn't be allowed back though.
Is there a viable replacement?I can't see Johnson going yet.
I think it took a while for the Howe Effect to kick in, too. Delayed-action ovine savagery.I can't see Johnson going yet. The 2019 intake are too loyal and too wet behind the ears to make real trouble for him, and the ERG loons and fellow travellers probably want to make him carry the can for the Brexit shitshow before they dump him. If things continue as they are he'll last into the New Year, although I wouldn't put money on his making it beyond the spring.
Is there a viable replacement?
January either cos of ‘ongoing corona effects’ or something we’re not meant to talk about. Supposedly.I can't see Johnson going yet.
I think it took a while for the Howe Effect to kick in, too. Delayed-action ovine savagery.
Gove?Well, there can't be many people who are less fit for the job than him. The problem is getting the Parliamentary party to agree on a successor.
The spring of 1965 that is.he's looked shambolic, incompetent and out of his depth since the spring
Gove?
Patel?
Raab?
Hancock?
Williamson?
Shapps?
Jenrick?
Truss?
That's part of the Madman Theory thing, though. The EU is supposed think Johnson doesn't need to care about consequences (possibly he doesn't care, but it's not really believable that no-one around him does).January either cos of ‘ongoing corona effects’ or something we’re not meant to talk about. Supposedly.
Gove?
Patel?
Raab?
Hancock?
Williamson?
Shapps?
Jenrick?
Truss?
Cuthbert?Gove?
Patel?
Raab?
Hancock?
Williamson?
Shapps?
Jenrick?
Truss?
I think that we're looking at a "tipping point" situation here. My guess is that, whatever happens to depose him, it won't be obvious beforehand - or even during - that's what is happening. But when the end comes, it will be quite quick. The only problem then is what creature will ooze from the swamp of mediocrity that is the Tory Party to replace him: there certainly doesn't seem to be a Tory equivalent of Ed Milliband . Obviously, it'll be Gove, but he's nailed his colours to the same mast Johnson has, although he is admittedly very good at nailing his colours to different masts as it suits him to.True, but he's looked shambolic, incompetent and out of his depth since the spring, and a lot of Tory MPs already think he's not up to the job. I can't see this making very much difference tbh. Not that watching him get a mauling from so emollient a figure as Ed Miliband isn't mighty entertaining, of course.
Meanwhile he's fiddling while the whole world burns...January either cos of ‘ongoing corona effects’ or something we’re not meant to talk about. Supposedly.
Won't be worth a betting slip in three monthsSunak, the bookies favourite at 5/2 atm
Ok, have the Conservative party been reading Urban 75 posts?
There are in all the land only 363 people less fit for the job than Johnson. Sadly they comprise the parliamentary conservative party.Well, there can't be many people who are less fit for the job than him. The problem is getting the Parliamentary party to agree on a successor.
Yeh but no one's thought to ask him what he thinks as they've all forgotten he was once leaderShe is also very wrong, and William hague, pointed out why in no uncertain terms international law is vital, and he relied on it every day whilst he was foreign sec.
He also joined the list of former Tory leaders opposing the bill. As it now stands, every living former Tory leader except IDS have now opposed the bill
It also took a leadership challenge - heseltineI think it took a while for the Howe Effect to kick in, too. Delayed-action ovine savagery.
Actually, true!Yeh but no one's thought to ask him what he thinks as they've all forgotten he was once leader
She is quite right that it is widely ignored tho, depending on what’s convenient at the time. Apartheid Israel’s daily breaches have virtually no consequences whatsoever.She is also very wrong, and William hague, pointed out why in no uncertain terms international law is vital, and he relied on it every day whilst he was foreign sec.
He also joined the list of former Tory leaders opposing the bill. As it now stands, every living former Tory leader except IDS have now opposed the bill
very true in the case of Israel (and the USA, and the PRC). I think the point is that the UK can't afford to simply trash international law, as we would be unable to then cite it in dealings with countries who do take it seriously (which happens to be every other EU nation).She is quite right that it is widely ignored tho, depending on what’s convenient at the time. Apartheid Israel’s daily breaches have virtually no consequences whatsoever.
I think that we're looking at a "tipping point" situation here. My guess is that, whatever happens to depose him, it won't be obvious beforehand - or even during - that's what is happening. But when the end comes, it will be quite quick. The only problem then is what creature will ooze from the swamp of mediocrity that is the Tory Party to replace him: there certainly doesn't seem to be a Tory equivalent of Ed Milliband . Obviously, it'll be Gove, but he's nailed his colours to the same mast Johnson has, although he is admittedly very good at nailing his colours to different masts as it suits him to.
There are in all the land only 363 people less fit for the job than Johnson. Sadly they comprise the parliamentary conservative party.