Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Octopus farming is ‘unethical and a threat to the food chain’

I would much rather that they survived to do their own thing in the sea.

With the occasional visit to entertain and teach us with their abilities ...
 
I would much rather that they survived to do their own thing in the sea.

With the occasional visit to entertain and teach us with their abilities ...
I bet they're bright enough to work out how to factory farm humans. They'd have an endless supply of food if they did, and could take over the world.

Octokind would be the dominant species on Earth. :cool:
 
Utterly disgraceful. They will be farming humans soon enough.
Diabolical and irresponsible.

Already been proposed:

Swedish Behaviourist Suggests Cannibalism to Combat Climate Change

Swedish behavioural scientist Magnus Söderlund has suggested that eating other people after they die could be a means of combatting climate change.

The scientist mentioned the possibility of cannibalism during a broadcast on Swedish television channel TV4 this week about a fair in Stockholm regarding “food of the future”.
 
No, we’re plants. Of course we’re fucking animals. We’re apes. We’re carnivores that have chosen to eat a few plants, we have similar physiology to bears, wolves, and lions. We did not evolve to eat plants, as we lack the correct digestive enzymes to break them down and extract nutrients from them. We also lack the bacteria required to synthesise B12, which are present in the guts of almost all herbivores.

I have eaten octopus, I didn’t like it. I have also eaten every single edible part of a cow, including the brain (certified BSE-free), and bone marrow (extremely nutritious is bovine marrow).


This is bollocks. The bit about humans not being plant eaters.

Amylase is the enzyme in saliva that break down starch. Starch is in roots and grains and fruits, not meat.

Our teeth have flat surfaces, which are better suited for grinding cellulose (i.e. plants) than tearing flesh. Our jaws move side to side, again for grinding rather the tearing: that’s plants not flesh.

Our gut is very long, another thing we have in common with plant eaters, unlike carnivores who have short guts.

We cannot make Vitamin C, we take it from our diet. This is yet another basic difference between carnivores (who can make Vit C) and plant eaters ( who can’t).

The bacteria in our gut thrives on soluble fibre, which is found in plant diets, not meat.


There are so many indicators that we are plant eaters, from our anatomy and physiology to our behaviour and habits.





And all marrow is extremely nutritious, not only cow marrow.



Also, why so rude to Jennastan ? No need for that.
 
Our gut is very long, another thing we have in common with plant eaters, unlike carnivores who have short guts.

Compared to obligate herbivores, our guts are short. Not as short as those of obligate carnivores, but somewhere in between. In other words we have the guts of omnivores.

Complicating this picture is the fact that cooking pre-dates anatomically modern humans, which has had an impact on our evolution. This can be most clearly seen in our teeth and jaws, which really aren't much good for eating raw stuff that hasn't evolved specifically to be eaten (such as fruits), or that which we haven't monkeyed with ourselves, such as all those plants we've domesticated and turned into big soft juicy parodies of their wild ancestors.
 
Octopuses, octopi, and octopodes are all correct - octopa, not so much.
Octopi, although you will see it, is an over-correction based on a mistaken assumption of a Latin derivation. It really is best avoided and many style guides will forbid it outright. Octopodes, while correct as it's from Greek, is not particularly reader-friendly. Octopuses is generally the one to go for unless you want to say octopodes for effect.
 
I don't have a problem with eating octopus if it has been caught sustainably. Same as any other fish, really. In the wild, they form part of the diet of lots of other animals, and they live highly dangerous lives, given that they need to hunt themselves so they can't just stay hidden away - no doubt a strong evolutionary driver towards making them clever. If they're being caught sustainably, that just adds humans to the already long list of predators out to get them. I don't have a problem with that.

So the ethical consideration for me with catching them is simply whether or not that is reducing their numbers. And with farming them, the main ethical consideration for me would be, as other have said, the vast quantities of prey food that would need to be caught to feed them. It doesn't make much sense, energy-wise, to farm a predator like an octopus.
 
Octopi, although you will see it, is an over-correction based on a mistaken assumption of a Latin derivation. It really is best avoided and many style guides will forbid it outright.

"Created by mistakenly treating a Greek word like it was from Latin, popularised by people who incorrectly thought it was more correct than the existing word, and entered common usage despite the objections of linguists" seems like a pretty standard backstory for a word in the English language, tbf.
 
I don't have a problem with eating octopus if it has been caught sustainably. Same as any other fish, really. In the wild, they form part of the diet of lots of other animals, and they live highly dangerous lives, given that they need to hunt themselves so they can't just stay hidden away - no doubt a strong evolutionary driver towards making them clever. If they're being caught sustainably, that just adds humans to the already long list of predators out to get them. I don't have a problem with that.

So the ethical consideration for me with catching them is simply whether or not that is reducing their numbers. And with farming them, the main ethical consideration for me would be, as other have said, the vast quantities of prey food that would need to be caught to feed them. It doesn't make much sense, energy-wise, to farm a predator like an octopus.

Marine Cephalapods are not fish.
 
"Created by mistakenly treating a Greek word like it was from Latin, popularised by people who incorrectly thought it was more correct than the existing word, and entered common usage despite the objections of linguists" seems like a pretty standard backstory for a word in the English language, tbf.
True. But that doesn't mean it has fully entered accepted usage. And it hasn't. As I said it's expressly forbidden in many publisher style guides. My advice to anyone writing about cephalopods would be to avoid it.
 
Seems a bit unfair that they seem to be leapfrogging pigs in the sentience hierarchy, but they do have a rogueish charm.
Just don't tell it to battery chickens. On the R4 reports today, they said Koreans eat octopus, while they are still ALIVE 😡
 
Fuck the soft-headed Disney bullshit, it's the fact that they're apparently going to be feeding the octopuses with creatures caught from the sea that's the real concern. There is already unsustainable pressure on fishery stocks that feed humans directly, why can't they feed the octopuses something else?

There should be a moratorium on industrial-scale fishing. Because if there isn't, the industry is going to collapse under its own weight anyway.

I watched it happen in the 60s.

At one point there was a lorry load of fish going up the hill out of Mallaig every twenty minutes. Then, quite suddenly, there were no lorries.

If you ever go too Mallaig, look at the big houses on the hillside as you come down into the town, they were all built by trawler owners.
 
Back
Top Bottom