DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
i didn't read any further as this is all too often the opening of the pedant.
you said this, you, with a straight face?
i didn't read any further as this is all too often the opening of the pedant.
does dylans' post bear me out?you said this, you, with a straight face?
The objection to the right of return is not that Jews can automatically become citizens of Israel. It is that ONLY Jews can automatically become citizens of Israel. In a state where those with an ancestral relationship to that land are denied citizenship, such a law is racistI don't think I've ever seen anyone arguing that jews don't have a moral right to live in Israel. They just don't have a moral right to massacre and displace others while they do so.
It's more that the strains of leftism that take up the Israel-palestinian situation are likely to also be the kind of anti-imperialist/third worldist strains that also write off much of the west's working class. ImoAnd the willingness of some on the left to hold the israeli w/c responsible for things that they would not blame them for if it was any other country.
I think there is some truth in this. It is a wrong approach however. Anti Zionist/ anti occupation organisations in Israel should be supported. I think the Israeli working class would benefit from the end of the occupation too.It's more that the strains of leftism that take up the Israel-palestinian situation are likely to also be the kind of anti-imperialist/third worldist strains that also write off much of the west's working class. Imo
I completely agreeI think there is some truth in this. It is wrong however. I think the Israeli working class would benefit from the end of the occupation too.
Such as? There were significant numbers of relatively poor white Afrikaaners in apartheid South Africa, mostly in rural areas. Don't blame them for apartheid, or make them suffer through sanctions? Well if they don't actively oppose apartheid, what exactly should they expect? And those who did actively oppose apartheid also supported sanctions. Would the same not apply to Israelis who oppose the occupation of Palestine?And the willingness of some on the left to hold the israeli w/c responsible for things that they would not blame them for if it was any other country.
I don't think I've ever seen anyone arguing that jews don't have a moral right to live in Israel. They just don't have a moral right to massacre and displace others while they do so.
palestinians only have to do it for a lifetimeI love how you can just hoy 'working class' and suddenly it's a different thing
I'd imagine it's impossible to relate to Israel or Palestinian working class, that place is insane, every Israeli has to be in a war for 2 years and be shot at and blown up, Palestinians probably have it even worse.
Fuck you lot
I love how you can just hoy 'working class' and suddenly it's a different thing
I'd imagine it's impossible to relate to Israel or Palestinian working class, that place is insane, every Israeli has to be in a war for 2 years and be shot at and blown up, Palestinians probably have it even worse.
Fuck you lot
not bloody you.I have a firm belief that Israel is not a collective noun for "Jews"
It is wrong to think that Likud speaks for every Israeli let alone the Diaspora
The current govt of Israel seems predicated on the notion that might is right
This is self defeating if you are a small country
Also it is worth noting that even according to the old religious texts, the Land of Canaan was seized by force, but was later lost
Personally, I reckon it belongs to the Jebusites, well at least Jerusalem does
Who speaks for them?
I dont claim tonot bloody you.
Not sure why you label all of those countries as religious states but for the record I call for the end to all religious states. Secular governance is the only guarantee of democratic rights for all a country's citizens.Ireland? great Britain? Andorra? Argentina? Dominican republic?, El Salvador?,Italy? Paraguay? Panama? Peru? poland? portugal? spain? Switzerland, Greece and finland? Denmark?, Iceland? and Sweden?
thats just some of the Christian ones, then there are the Muslim ones, the hindu's and the buddhists.
strange that all these religious states don't get you calling for their destruction. only the only Jewish one
I don't think I've ever seen anyone arguing that jews don't have a moral right to live in Israel. They just don't have a moral right to massacre and displace others while they do so.
Such as? There were significant numbers of relatively poor white Afrikaaners in apartheid South Africa, mostly in rural areas. Don't blame them for apartheid, or make them suffer through sanctions? Well if they don't actively oppose apartheid, what exactly should they expect? And those who did actively oppose apartheid also supported sanctions. Would the same not apply to Israelis who oppose the occupation of Palestine?
'Don't blame the Israeli working class' is all very well, but their situation is not comparable to that of Palestinians in the occupied territories. There isn't an equivalence to be drawn between their situations.
Ireland? great Britain? Andorra? Argentina? Dominican republic?, El Salvador?,Italy? Paraguay? Panama? Peru? poland? portugal? spain? Switzerland, Greece and finland? Denmark?, Iceland? and Sweden
just some of the Christian ones, then there are the Muslim ones, the hindu's and the buddhists.
No you just get excluded for being a PalestinianYou don't get kicked out of Israel for not being Orthodox.
No you just get excluded for being a Palestinian
Any Jew anywhere in the world can automatically become a citizen at any time. A non Jew can't. This is the practice of a theocracy. A state that defines citizenship on the basis of religion. Do any of the countries listed above define citizenship on those terms? No. Therefore the comparison is facileRight, well say that in the first place then.
Any Jew anywhere in the world can automatically become a citizen at any time. A non Jew can't. This is the practice of a theocracy. A state that defines citizenship on the basis of religion. Do any of the countries listed above define citizenship on those terms? No. Therefore the comparison is facile
You are right however that Israel does not define citizenship or even the state in terms of adherence or belief. Like Pakistan it is primarily about identity not practice or theology. There is a contradiction at the heart of the Zionist project, that is it wants it both ways, it is a self proclaimed secular project ie the content or practice of belief is not the issue, but it is a state nevertheless which defines itself in religious terms or in terms of national identity defined primarily as religious identity. This is a contradiction at the heart not only of the Israeli project but at the heart of all religious nationalism. You don't have to be a practicing Jew to be a citizen, you don't have to believe anything in particular, but you do have to be accepted as a Jew by the state and equal citizenship is defined in terms of religious inclusion. It is an ideology of inclusion and exclusion. An ideology of nationalism defined in religious terms.Yes, thank you, I'm well aware of who can and cannot become a citizen of Israel.
Any Jew anywhere in the world can automatically become a citizen at any time. A non Jew can't. This is the practice of a theocracy. A state that defines citizenship on the basis of religion. Do any of the countries listed above define citizenship on those terms? No. Therefore the comparison is facile