torres said:So L&L was right about the post/thread/page then.
nino_savatte said:
nino_savatte said:Moe sinned against than sinning. Anyone would think that you were totally innocent.
Do you always threaten other posters with bannings (even though you don't have the power?).
nino_savatte said:I understand what you're saying but some posters actively seek to get others banned from Urban. I've seen this sort of thing happen before.
durruti02 said:Is that it???? after all the accusations of tampering???? that i replied in your text IN BOLD to make it VERY CLEAR it was me not you???? ]
this is what you call tampering???? and have been acusing me of for months??
oh for fuck sake nino please please deal with issues/OPs not on this level .. i would have apologised IMMEDIATELY if you did not like me doing this ( as i did when i put numbers in your posts (for clarity)
Crispy said:Look, I understand why you're getting angry - it's because I don't know what the fuck's going on, and I've professed not to care. And I'll be honest here - I don't know what's going on because it bores the living cat crap out of me. I read the threads I'm interested in, and when posts get reported I read those too. But I don't see the big picture, and shouldn't be expected to - there are 4000 new posts per day on urban and I won't read them all.
Now, having said that, I'll take some time this evening to read through this thread and see if I can see what's going on. I might even spank someone's wrist, if it turns out someone's being childish enough to respond to such childish measures.
"Why is this allowed" is the wrong sort of question. It implies a continuous vetting process of permitted and forbidden activity. As far as I'm concerned my responsibilities as a moderator are, in order of importance:
1. Remove material that is illegal or could lead to urban75 being sued
2. Ban spammers and delete spam
3. Verify new users
4. Correct spelling mistakes in thread titles, move threads, merge threads, bin threads
5. Tell off grown men and women for bickering at each other.
durruti02 said:nino .. i am seeking toget you banned ONLY if you persist in your disruptive behaviour ... please please deal with how you post .. dropped the insults .. drop the paranoia ( see above again!!" I've seen this sort of thing happen before" ) and just debate!!!
Basically, it's when we can be arsed, and when butting in won't end up making the situation worse.durruti02 said:fair play crispy .. as regards first bit of post
and equally for second part, though i also thought you moderated/monitored breachs of posting rules especially where posts were reported .. thought i had seen that before from mods?
durruti02 said:nino i am NOT totally innocent .. i have lost it with you before and insulted you .. but never to the level you insult me
and i do NOT go onto your threads and accuse for months on end that there is something nasty behind the OP. And I do not start threads accusing you of shit WITHOUT any evidence.
equally i do NOT make accusations against you that are unfounded .. except once i accused you of being a stalinist. I based this on the way you argue and insinuate that someone ( me) was a racist/fascist, without providing ANY evidence but by nods and winks. I accept i was wrong and have previoulsy apologised for this.
You know mate in all this never once have you ever apologised to me for anything; Not the vile dig that i have alzheimers, not the nasty suggestion i am like those who think that migrants are here to 'fuck our women', nor the time you refused to belive my longest mate is black calling me a liar, not all the 'fucking stupid twat' insults. etc etc etc. NOT ONE APOLOGY nino when i have shown your insults to be wrong countless times
and so you wonder why i think you should be banned? because you do NOT debate. You are opinionated ( fine) but you do NOT engage in debate of OPs i create. YOu instead seek to dismiss the OP by insinuation of nastyness or bigotry, or whatever, BEHIND the OP, NEVER with ANY evidence.
And you CONSTANTLY misrepresent my posts/opinions e.g. that i have painted marx as a racist or that i have said marx was against immigration or that i have said migrants get priority in social housing. Over and over patiently i have shown this NOT to be true with referneces to articles and posts. Yet over and over you repeat the false allegations.
and you have, dozens of times, accused me of tampering with your posts. A serious accusation!! so i have consistently demanded you provide evidence ... and FINALLY you produce evidence!!! .. all it was was that i had replied IN BOLD in your text. something that people do ALL the time!!!
Did you not think that someday my patience would give out???
will it has nino. If you persist in this malicious behaviour i will do my utmost to get you banned. If you stop it i will post with you as happily as any other poster. OK?
the nasty suggestion i am like those who think that migrants are here to 'fuck our women',
and i do NOT go onto your threads and accuse for months on end that there is something nasty behind the OP. And I do not start threads accusing you of shit WITHOUT any evidence.
..Ireland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labour market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class..."
interestingly the left often reproduces parts of this letter ( below) but not the above sentance ..
"..And most important of all! Every industrial and commercial centre in England now possesses a working class divided into two hostile camps, English proletarians and Irish proletarians. The ordinary English worker hates the Irish worker as a competitor who lowers his standard of life. In relation to the Irish worker he regards himself as a member of the ruling nation and consequently he becomes a tool of the English aristocrats and capitalists against Ireland, thus strengthening their domination over himself. He cherishes religious, social, and national prejudices against the Irish worker. His attitude towards him is much the same as that of the “poor whites” to the Negroes in the former slave states of the U.S.A.. The Irishman pays him back with interest in his own money. He sees in the English worker both the accomplice and the stupid tool of the English rulers in Ireland..."
durruti02 said:nino .. i am seeking toget you banned ONLY if you persist in your disruptive behaviour ... please please deal with how you post .. dropped the insults .. drop the paranoia ( see above again!!" I've seen this sort of thing happen before" ) and just debate!!!
durruti02 said:and when knotted qouted all this .. you ignored it
http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=6061699&postcount=326
Knotted said:He doesn't bare grudges.
Lock&Light said:
MC5 said:You're bent on stirring the pot aren't you?
Lock&Light said:
Lock&Light said:You think anyone still needs to stir this pot?
MC5 said:It's gone quiet now though.
Cause some trouble, you fucking pacifist!Lock&Light said:I hope I'm not to be blamed for that as well!
Crispy said:Cause some trouble, you fucking pacifist!
Crispy said:Ok - nino, stop calling durrito a racist please. Thank you.
durrito - please try as hard as you can to ignore him. Thank you.
If you want, I can ban you both if I hear another peep, but that's how I'd treat children, not adults, and I'm dealing with adults here, right?
He just can't cope with intense debate.
Isn't he always?MC5 said:You're bent on stirring the pot aren't you?
ViolentPanda said:Isn't he always?...............
Crispy said:Ok - nino, stop calling durrito a racist please. Thank you.
durrito - please try as hard as you can to ignore him. Thank you.
If you want, I can ban you both if I hear another peep, but that's how I'd treat children, not adults, and I'm dealing with adults here, right?
nino_savatte said:I have never called durutti a "racist".