ManchesterBeth
Well-Known Member
Sorry if my posts aren’t academic enough for your well educated ass.
Actually that was a comment about your 'conditioning.'
Sorry if my posts aren’t academic enough for your well educated ass.
, trotbot.
I am not sure that you understand what racism is tbh
Whilst it seems like a step forward that you are now trying to pass off points that others have had to make to you as your own you still don't appear to engage with your own associations at all. Blaming me for noticing is piss poor.
For example compare...
'There are Black victims in working class communities'
'There are Black working class victims'
There is a difference.
Actually that was a comment about your 'conditioning.'
You view everything along racial lines (which is part of what racism is) and then project that onto my words. I’ve explained what I meant and it follows logically from my earlier posts (where you were claiming things like working class is code for ‘white’) - I’m not doing retrospective acrobatics.
For example compare...
'There are Black victims in working class communities'
'There are Black working class victims'
There is a difference.
Basically i am trying to understand who this article's target audience is Smokeandsteam
Bizarre then, when my colleagues and neighbours etc are of mixed ethnicities that you think I exclude them when referring to the wc. It’s because that’s how YOU think, not me.
Yes, we know, hence repeatedly making a similar point/challenge to you! If you can continue to reflect that in your posts from now on I think we've probably achieved something.Working class communities tend to be more racially mixed than others - especially in London. So how is it code for ‘white’?
I’m tiring of you again tbh.
You aren’t the target audience.
Yes, we know, hence repeatedly making a similar point/challenge to you! If you can continue to reflect that in your posts from now on I think we've probably achieved something.
Did I say I was? ffs.
I don’t need to add caveats to ‘working class’ for it to mean many ethnicities ffs. It already means that.
No-one is saying you do. It's the implied exclusions that are the problem as you well know.
Don’t do heavy policing - it’s racist.
Don’t do community action - it’s racist.
*black kids continue to die*
I think by community action Magnus means people patrolling and calling the cops on the suspicious or trying to detain them, vigilantes anywayCommunity action should always be the first resort. It's hard for some antisocial knobhead to cry racism when it's the people around him (and it is almost always a male or males), of every colour, condemning him. Use the tools available, and if/when they don't work, THEN bring in the Old Bill, who won't do fuck all, but at least you can make sure your complaint is officially registered.
Bear in mind, folks, that ASB has to be of the order of dealing out of your council home, for eviction proceedings to even be considered. Local authorities prefer to look the other way regarding ASB less serious than that.
If we ever expect to rebuild class solidarity/consciousness in communities then drug gangs are one of the obstacles to that so will need confronting at some stage along the line. Unless they somehow represent a progressive element?
I think by community action Magnus means people patrolling and calling the cops on the suspicious or trying to detain them, vigilantes anyway
Community action should always be the first resort. It's hard for some antisocial knobhead to cry racism when it's the people around him (and it is almost always a male or males), of every colour, condemning him. Use the tools available, and if/when they don't work, THEN bring in the Old Bill, who won't do fuck all, but at least you can make sure your complaint is officially registered.
I think by community action Magnus means people patrolling and calling the cops on the suspicious or trying to detain them, vigilantes anyway
I do like the image of plucky young men signing up to fight the gun in 14-18, nicely forgetting the introduction of conscription in 1916. And it's not like people fighting in subsequent wars were entirely eager to kill. What the article doesn't consider in its haste to denigrate its target is the role computer games, in particular first person shooter games, may play. The US army reports keen game players make better soldiers and have i think developed games themselves. I don't think it's a particularly good article with its peculiar contrast of upstanding working class (white) men of 1914-18 who needed conditioning to kill and the lumpen young (black) men of today who need no such compulsion
Next time I bump into them I willWhy not take it up with them personally?
Who appointed you Spokesman for the Working Classes all of a sudden?Its great that you both have your own ideas around what you deem to be acceptable responses. No phoning the cops! No vigilantism! Ethnic quotas of activists!
If only the working class were all perfectly turned out libertarian communists, like you two!
Until then, we’ll just have to accept that they might organise in ways us sneering outsiders find unpalatable.
Yes, that’s you. You’re arguing against what you think I mean despite me repeatedly saying that isn’t what I mean.