so as per thread title...
Clearly the done thing, these days.They rejected the deal recommended by the BMA by a margin of 58% to 42%. The chairman of the BMA junior doctors’ committee, Johann Malawana, resigned after the result was announced.
He always said he'd go, if they voted against the offer - reckoned it was the best he was able to do.Clearly the done thing, these days.
There is already an issue about people not joining the profession, and people leaving it early and/or emigrating because they are so pissed off with how badly treated they are in the UK.The most important thing that will happen will happen quietly, out of the public gaze, and quietly. In fact, it won't be something happening, so much as something not happening.
Because the effect of this assault on this profession will be to discourage people from joining it. Or, if they join it, from working for the NHS or even in the UK. As the Guardian article mentions, this action by Hunt has sowed great mistrust amongst doctors (and, no doubt, other health professionals), and will have made even fewer people consider being a medic as a good career choice.
Of course, Hunt and Co don't need to worry about this, because by the time the full impact of a doctor shortage hits, in 5-10 years time, he'll be sitting on a few non-executive directorships, and the health service will be no more than a distant memory to him...although it doubtless won't prevent his successors from sneering at whatever governmental action is being taken to square that particular service.
I can only hope that Malawana's departure paves the way for a successor who is prepared to continue the fight: ultimately, the doctors hold the whip hand here, and if they chose to, could push back very firmly against the government.
Yeah, presumably because they will be paid less for working more hours.Mainly 'cause it was shit, I think.
The government can impose the contract, yes, but I suspect that junior doctors are amongst the more mobile of the public sector employees this government appears to have declared war on (along with all the other social groups).There is already an issue about people not joining the profession, and people leaving it early and/or emigrating because they are so pissed off with how badly treated they are in the UK.
Other health professionals are watching this keenly, because everyone knows that it is their turn next/soon.
However, I don't see how the junior doctors do have the whip hand here, because it is really easy for the government to impose this new contract on juniors. The same is not true of the consultants' contract negotiations, but juniors tend to move jobs frequently, in order to continue their training and prepare them to become a consultant.
I understand that some Trusts are already offering the new contract.
The junior doctor contract will be imposed on medics in England, following the profession's rejection of the terms, ministers have confirmed.
The decision was widely expected, after British Medical Association members voted 58% to 42% against accepting the deal, agreed by government and union negotiators in May.
The BMA had urged them to accept it.
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said doctors would start moving on to the contract in the coming months.
Most of the profession should be on it by autumn next year, he added.
Brazen, isn't it?Wtf?! - they're forcing through the whole thing that's been the subject of all these strikes/negotiations - and doing it on Chilcot Day?!
Bet there was a big gold star in (h)unt's diary for 6/7/16.Brazen, isn't it?
The week of strikes by junior doctors this month will be followed by three more five-day walkouts in October, November and December in England.
The announcement by the British Medical Association comes only a day after it said there would be five days of all-out stoppages from 12 September.
The lickspittle BBC are running with "Medical Leaders Critisise Strikes Plan" and quote a few think-tanks that are against the strike, without explaining who they are or what their agendas are. Piss poor.
The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges said it was "disappointed" and the proposed strikes were disproportionate.
The British Medical Association said it was "absolutely behind" the action.
I've been wondering about this (as someone who has no insight whatsoever): would things have been markedly different if someone had replaced Hunt? This is the party's agenda, not some personal crusade of Hunt's, isn't it?The whole thing is not going to end well, May's Cabinet would have been a perfect non face-losing opportunity to get rid of Hunt, as is NHS gets further trashed and the the tries continue unopposed
its not just Hunt's crusade no. Remember the health and social care act 2012? Lansly not hunt. It's a pretty naked running down of the service so it can eventually be privatised. They want health precarity as well as housing precarity for the w/c. Keeps us under heel. Plus they want the land, they want the buildings and they want the profits to be made milking working people. They look at the US and they see the profits made. Its obscene how obvious this is. Same pattern, every time.I've been wondering about this (as someone who has no insight whatsoever): would things have been markedly different if someone had replaced Hunt? This is the party's agenda, not some personal crusade of Hunt's, isn't it?
I saw that, and this is the 3rd or 4th sentence -
No agenda to that headline, nosireebob.