"The Orwell Prize has no independent capacity to research the work that is submitted. It relies on the integrity of authors and of their publisher’s editorial practices."
theres usually about 12 on the longlist each year and each one has at most half a dozen articles submitted for consideration. if they havent got time to check up on an absolute maximum of 80odd articles then what do they do all day?
from wiki:
"The Orwell Prize is regarded as the pre-eminent British prize for political writing."
i think someone needs to edit that tbh
Maybe David Rose will take up your suggestion.
I think he's done his course now. Just waiting for everyone holding something back to flood the cunt when he does his [bold]next 5 grand (yes) for 600 words piece.[/bold]
Into the ground.
is rod liddle really the best they can do?
On Fleet Street it was common knowledge for years that Hari made it up...
Johann Hari will return to the Independent as a columnist – but not an interviewer – in four or five weeks
Hari produced his medical history "which showed that he acted in the way he did" in relation to the Wikipedia amendments.
I'm surprised you say there was cover-up in the sense there were inclings before because that is genuinely news to me. One of the problems … was that no one had ever complained … Nobody had alerted us to the fact he had drawn his information from somewhere else. If there was we might have nipped it in the bud but in fact it continued.
If i can make it there..what a cunt...I’d like to thank the Independent for the privilege of working for them over the past nine years, and for offering me my job back, starting in a few weeks. But after nearly six months living in New York City, and plenty of time to reflect, I’ve decided to not take them up on their kind offer.
There are two reasons. I’m willing to take the flack for my errors myself: when you screw up, you should pay a price. But I’m not willing to see other people, who are played no part in those errors and are unimpeachably decent people, take the flack too. It’s not fair on them. The Independent has been great to me, and we need its principles in the public arena without distractions.
Secondly, while doing some journalistic retraining in the US, I’ve started working on a book on a subject I believe is important and requires urgent action. To be done properly it needs international travel and the kind of in depth focus that’s not possible when you are writing a heavily researched column at the same time. So, while I’ll be writing occasional articles elsewhere, I’ll be mainly delving deeply into this one subject for now.
Above all else, I’d like to thank all the readers of the Independent. Ever since I started as a columnist as a 23 year old I have learned so much from you. I often learned the most from the more critical messages – you have talked me out of a dozen positions – but your supportive letters and emails since last July have hugely moved me.
I’ll continue to be a loyal reader and supporter of the Independent. It is one of the world’s great newspapers, and I feel privileged to have been part of it all these years.
hari said:There are two reasons. I’m willing to take the flack for my errors myself: when you screw up, you should pay a price.
in the US, I’ve started working on a book on a subject I believe is important and requires urgent action. To be done properly it needs international travel and the kind of in depth focus that’s not possible when you are writing a heavily researched column at the same time.
I’d like to thank the Independent for the privilege of working for them over the past nine years, and for offering me my job back, starting in a few weeks
maybe they saw the light and told him to cunt off.