Blagsta
Minimum cage, maximum cage
What? Are you on crack?That once you've got armed commandos aboard and you're unarmed, the best form of defence is surrender.
What? Are you on crack?That once you've got armed commandos aboard and you're unarmed, the best form of defence is surrender.
They were probably asking for it.It's bizarre the kind of desperate pseudo-logic that you get when Israel commits one of it's atrocities.
In this case the argument seems to centre around the idea that when State actors do something then all moral and legal conventions become qualitatively different somehow. So any right to self defence becomes a duty of surrender when confronted by agents of a State, and the responsibility for the consequences of an act of aggression are somehow transferred to the victims.
Apolgise, you're Man of honour - say what you got wrong and why. Say it now and say it here.Get fucked wanker.
What?Because of this, not despite it.
So there goes our hopes that Obama was going to be any different then
What is it about US Presidents and Israel? Do you think they take the new President behind an curtain when he becomes Pres and tell him they will rape his wife and kill his children if he doesn't do as he's told?
Or maybe they open a suitcase and bright orange glow appears and the President looks and says "oh"
What is it about US Presidents and Israel? Do you think they take the new President behind an curtain when he becomes Pres and tell him they will rape his wife and kill his children if he doesn't do as he's told? "
Lol. When was that?
You'd think they'd have taken into consideration, knowledge of how the IDF acts, when first deciding about sailing in spite of the warnings.
according to him, the best form of self defence is surrender, so it will be interesting to see how he reacts.Not any more, war on this one. War.
Oh right...for you, this is gold, the right to self defence is lost if you don't surrender. Can't beat that.For me, the case for self defence here expires when anyone who doesn't take the opportunity to put their hands up and end the violence, doesn't.
In this case it's when armed commandos boots hit the deck of your ship.
No...it was more,,,evasive nonsense...to distract from serious discussion on a subject that is incredibly important to many urbanites, I'm one of them. Wordplay, misplaced humour.It was a direct response to a direct question.
You'd think they'd have taken into consideration, knowledge of how the IDF acts, when first deciding about sailing in spite of the warnings.
Perhaps to get aid to people in dire need; people who, according to Amnesty, are getting 25% of the bare minimum needed.If an aid flotilla sailed toward Inchon in the face of repeated warnings from the North Koreans not to do it or face the consequences, I would ponder the motivations of the flotilla in proceeding, just as I am here.
You know what. I just don't believe a word you type..
What?
Perhaps to get aid to people in dire need; people who, according to Amnesty, are getting 25% of the bare minimum needed.
Erm ... getting a bit carried away ...
They were probably asking for it.
No...it was more,,,evasive nonsense...to distract from serious discussion on a subject that is incredibly important to many urbanites, I'm one of them. .
The Israelis expected it. But what do we get. The same unconditional support that they have always given.
Like the civil rights movement and the Klu Klux Klan. Same rules apply.
It's so incredibly important to you that you will set aside time to make many internet posts about this serious matter.
They were given the option of landing the aid at a designated port, to have it forwarded.
No I mean. We all hoped that Obama would have a little bit more of a critical approach to Israel than Bush, just a tiny little bit.
You know very well that various vital supplies - such as construction materials - aren't getting through that way.They were given the option of landing the aid at a designated port, to have it forwarded.
You'll call bullshit on that, but doing it the way they did it, there was exactly zero chance that any aid would get through.
Again, mounting any form of defence other than surrender, against armed IDF commandos is, in my view, stupid.
Do you know how many UN resolutions condemning Israel the US have ever supported? 0
I don't know who 'the usual crowd' are, because I don't often post in World Politics. But my impression is that the thread has been remarkably restrained given the subject matter, and has got some useful information/links/videos.
Exactly the same. When blacks marched in Birmingham, they knew what would happen. When the Students Strike occured, they knew what would happen. They did it because of their belief in their cause, and they were ready to face injury and death in order to achieve it. And many were injured, and some died.
Exactly the same. When blacks marched in Birmingham, they knew what would happen. When the Students Strike occured, they knew what would happen. They did it because of their belief in their cause, and they were ready to face injury and death in order to achieve it. And many were injured, and some died.