nino_savatte
No pasaran!
simple, it is the differrence between individuals and a party that claims or in this case does, represent them
Come again?
simple, it is the differrence between individuals and a party that claims or in this case does, represent them
fuck me, so sorry for replying to your question.jesus you post way too much .. ok
so, no acknowlegement of my apology? oh wellfuck me, so sorry for replying to your question.
what a hypocritical tosser you can be
now thats much nicer isn't itthanks for the apology.
you hypocritical tosser
Afaik, there are also PFLP fighters in Gaza, so it's not all Hamas.
In other words you'd stand alongside Hamas members in defending their community while arguing against their politics.simple, it is the differrence between individuals and a party that claims or in this case does, represent them
thanks for the apology.
you hypocritical tosser
*laughs*now thats much nicer isn't it
hey you can be three!*laughs*
You two!
Who will reach a truce first - durruti and belboid or Israel and the Palestinians?
israel and palestine clearly at least i fucking hope so please!!!!!Who will reach a truce first - durruti and belboid or Israel and the Palestinians?
Never! Habnass is an islamo-fascist front!just as soon as he accedes to my demands for control of the hobnobs
He was an Imam at the mosque from 2001-2003 (and an attendee from 1997), after fundamentalist manouvering got him his position. He spent more than half his tenure under suspension once the local community wrested back control of the mosque's management.wrong nieve whatever .. hamza was a key part of it in those years and several years so clearly not 'sent on there way pretty quickly' ..
I'm not the one pretending.yet again i ask why do you want to pretend otherwise?
israel agrees to truce .. bbc headline .. god i fucking hoep so
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7815929.stmIsrael has agreed "on the principles" of a ceasefire proposal, raising hopes of an end to its conflict with Palestinian militants in Gaza.
"The challenge now is to get the details to match the principles," Israeli spokesman Mark Regev said.
The Palestinian militant group Hamas said there were "positive signs but no agreement yet".
The development came as Israel halted military operations in Gaza for three hours to aid humanitarian efforts.
The lull, which began about 1100 GMT and ended shortly after 1400 GMT, was the first of what an Israeli spokesman said would be a daily ceasefire to allow Gazans to "get medical attention, get supplies... whatever they need".
I've no doubt they do, but I haven't seen anyone but Zachor claim that hospital was storing anything improper, I want to know if he is just defaulting to that view, or referencing some 'news' site like ynet - which claimed the the three Israeli soldiers killed in Jabalya had been ambushed by Hamas, then removed the article when Israel admitted they were killed by a poorly targetted shell.
Israel is refusing to let international journalists into Gaza, despite a supreme court ruling to allow a limited number of reporters to enter the territory.
From that link:
They are still ignoring their own Supreme Court.
the majority opposed sending in any ground troops as well.
from the beeb link, it just seems that israel have agreed to talks about talks. a bit of a step forward i suppose
Thousands will be dead before Livni proves she is much tougher than Netanyahu
How so? Has the Supreme Court ordered any penalty, or just an opinion?Which is proof postive that not all Israelis support the vicious actions of their deranged PM.
How so? Has the Supreme Court ordered any penalty, or just an opinion?
How so? Has the Supreme Court ordered any penalty, or just an opinion?
The ambiguous question put is "Time to bring the war home?" which even if it is a call to physically attack anybody is one call, not "calls".btw, on Indymedia, there are calls to physically attack
I don't know why you've put scare quotes around "zionist", do you think the organisers would object to the term?a 'zionist' meeting tomorrow
But not at a demonstration. So some random person on the internet might or might not have suggested using physical force against cheerleaders for murder, and somebody somewhere made some anti-semetic remarks and you demand a condemnathon?and a poster notes a jewish friend being shouted at with anti-semetic remarks, looks like it is not just Hamas that hates jews, wonder if Respect, SWP, etc will comdemn all that
Congratulations, you have just spoken out in favour of terrorism. Yes, terrorism, as in purposely killing civilians. I hope you are proud of yourself.Killing as many Hamas members and their supporters as the IDF can is the way to go now.
So some random person on the internet might or might not have suggested using physical force against cheerleaders for murder, and somebody somewhere made some anti-semetic remarks and you demand a condemnathon?