I think there are different factors.
WRT the poverty rate in the state of Israel, I think it's fare to put at least part of the blame on the shift, under Fat Bennie, from a European-model welfare system to a US-model system, which kicked a whole stratum of low-paid Israeli workers below the poverty line. That can't be addressed without re-visiting the political choices that were made.
WRT to the rampaging, war, even on the scale in Gaza, generates business and profits. If not for companies like IMI, then for their American friends at Lockheed and general Dynamics.
I think there are different factors.
WRT the poverty rate in the state of Israel, I think it's fare to put at least part of the blame on the shift, under Fat Bennie, from a European-model welfare system to a US-model system, which kicked a whole stratum of low-paid Israeli workers below the poverty line. That can't be addressed without re-visiting the political choices that were made.
WRT to the rampaging, war, even on the scale in Gaza, generates business and profits. If not for companies like IMI, then for their American friends at Lockheed and general Dynamics.
hey i was just reading some about Ashdod on wikipedia a couple hours ago!Maybe a deliberate memory loss to prevent himself from becoming stark-raving-insane.
Peres knows why the Gazans fire rockets because he knows that the towns of Ashkelon, Ashdod, and Sderot are built on the ruins of former villages and towns that the Palestinians who survived the ethnic cleansing of 1948 used to live in. He knows who destroyed them, who gave the orders, how many were massacred (males over 12). It's these Palestinians - at least those who survived - who now live with their descendents in Gaza strip. 61 years ago these massacres and ethnic cleansing happened. These are undeniable.
Matthew 7-5Any decent left approach has to acknowledge the Iranian Hamas missiles on Siderot etc, no matter how 'ineffective they are, they are just as unacceptable as a terror weapon' as F15's paid for by the U.S..
Islam is not a kind religion, and like the others it's not averse to exploiting the hardships suffered by populations to promote itself and its agenda (usually supreme dominion over all mankind). But I don't want to threadjack this important thread.
israel's gone mad.
stark. raving. insane.
do these people live on the same planet as everyone else?
yes you are probably right ..
p.s. you are aware it is alleged that israeli secretly supported hamas as an alternative to plo? a nasty cycnical tactic that has backfired though maybe it has not??? .. for hamas has nothing but kassam ( until iran gets the bomb) .. so maybe isreal is happy with hamas? a few ethipopian kids die in some shitty village ( like america are with al quida) they can cope with ..
I guess in a sense it's a problem about the enforceability of international law.
Fat chance. But I have been hoping for something along the same lines. It seems to me to be the only way forward.Right now I'd settle for some of the EU members (including the UK) withdrawing their diplomatic missions from the state of Israel and expelling the state of Israel's diplomats from their nations.
The events in Gaza are indeed terrible, and should be comdemned forcefully, but they are not the only atrocities happening around the world, indeed five million souls have died in the Congo. then we have Darfur: I haven't noticed a STWC protest around that, ah, but they will say 'we (the UK) are not involved , no and we are 'not involved' in the events in Palestine. It seems to me the politics of the left in the UK is now dominated by Middle Eastern causes and yes, its seemingly willingly find itself with such progressive allies as offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood. I'm just waiting for the 'we are all Hamas, placards to appear, an organisation which has just announced crucifixion to be allowed in Gaza and which has close links with the extremists in Iran, etc.
Any decent left approach has to acknowledge the Iranian Hamas missiles on Siderot etc, no matter how 'ineffective they are, they are just as unacceptable as a terror weapon' as F15's paid for by the U.S. On the SU blog all sorts of moral equilvalence 'arguments are being hoisted,
But its unlikely they will.....
Another thing that puzzles me is why mujahideen from across the Arab world don't come to the Palestinians' defence. They did in Afghanistan, Iraq, Bosnia etc.
Different reasons.
IMHO one of the reasons (besides the state of Israel's tight policing of entry to and exit from the occupied territories) that the Mujahs haven't shown up there in any numbers is because even though HAMAS are overtly Islamic in motivation , the Palestinian people still follow a secular turn of mind, a little similar to the Turks. They may be brother and sister Muslims, but they're not amenable to the lure of Wahhabism (yet).
Originally Posted by November:
Islam is not a kind religion, and like the others it's not averse to exploiting the hardships suffered by populations to promote itself and its agenda (usually supreme dominion over all mankind).
He shows extensive knowledge about Islam. Islam is not a kind religion at all, nor is xianity or judism or most of the others. It is brutal & promotes ignorance & superstition & obedience. It's harmful BS being spewed by those who get something from it. You are indoctrinated I think & the indoctrination is a large part of the problem.Permit me to say you showed by this your absolute ignorance about Islam.
salaam.
He shows extensive knowledge about Islam. Islam is not a kind religion at all, nor is xianity or judism or most of the others. It is brutal & promotes ignorance & superstition & obedience. It's harmful BS being spewed by those who get something from it. You are indoctrinated I think & the indoctrination is a large part of the problem.
CNN Interview with former Georgia congresswoman Cynthia McKinney who was in Boat Rammed by Israeli Warship, Over International Waters
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dL_B4vSaYGw
Israel has rejected international calls for a 48-hour truce in the Gaza Strip to allow in humanitarian aid, says a government spokesman.
Palestinian officials say about 374 Palestinians have died in Israeli air strikes since Saturday; four Israelis have been killed by rockets fired from Gaza, which is under Hamas control.
sourceWhat is the doctrine of proportionality?
The doctrine originated with the 1907 Hague Conventions, which govern the laws of war, and was later codified in Article 49 of the International Law Commission's 1980 Draft Articles on State Responsibility (PDF). The doctrine is also referred to indirectly in the 1977 Additional Protocols of the Geneva Conventions. Regardless of whether states are party to the treaties above, experts say the principle is part of what is known as customary international law. According to the doctrine, a state is legally allowed to unilaterally defend itself and right a wrong provided the response is proportional to the injury suffered. The response must also be immediate and necessary, refrain from targeting civilians, and require only enough force to reinstate the status quo ante.
Many a true word is spoken in jest.I read somewhere that the massive influx of Russian jews (and people claiming to have once sat outside a synagog)...
True, but it's also a factor in the general torpor of the economy. Russians expect and demand higher wages than Palestinian day-labour agencies....in the 90s is also involved here... for one thing the value of Palestinian labour has been displaced, as were the living places of many more to house the new Russian working class. Now Isreal needs it's Palestinians less and fielding it's new range of hardy Russian settlers, an even more Wild West attitude toward the 'injuns'.
He shows extensive knowledge about Islam. Islam is not a kind religion at all, nor is xianity or judism or most of the others. It is brutal & promotes ignorance & superstition & obedience. It's harmful BS being spewed by those who get something from it. You are indoctrinated I think & the indoctrination is a large part of the problem.
Well like some of the reports you posted say Israel has broken International maritime laws, however there not the only laws Israel repeatedly ignores so why would they give a shit about this one, especially when by breaking it they can contribute to the suffering of the people of Gaza!
Simple really, stop firing rockets and Israel will stop sending bombers.
andThe inhabitants fought the white settlers not out of fear that they might be expropriated, but simply because there has never been an indigenous inhabitant anywhere or at any time who has ever accepted the settlement of others in his country. Any native people – its all the same whether they are civilized or savage – views their country as their national home, of which they will always be the complete masters. They will not voluntarily allow, not only a new master, but even a new partner. And so it is for the Arabs. Compromisers in our midst attempt to convince us that the Arabs are some kind of fools who can be tricked by a softened formulation of our goals, or a tribe of money grubbers who will abandon their birth right to Palestine for cultural and economic gains. I flatly reject this assessment of the Palestinian Arabs. Culturally they are 500 years behind us, spiritually they do not have our endurance or our strength of will, but this exhausts all of the internal differences. We can talk as much as we want about our good intentions; but they understand as well as we what is not good for them. They look upon Palestine with the same instinctive love and true fervor that any Aztec looked upon his Mexico or any Sioux looked upon his prairie. To think that the Arabs will voluntarily consent to the realization of Zionism in return for the cultural and economic benefits we can bestow on them is infantile.
sourceTwo brief remarks: In the first place, if anyone objects that this point of view is immoral, I answer: It is not true; either Zionism is moral and just or it is immoral and unjust. But that is a question that we should have settled before we became Zionists. Actually we have settled that question, and in the affirmative.
We hold that Zionism is moral and just. And since it is moral and just, justice must be done, no matter whether Joseph or Simon or Ivan or Achmet agree with it or not.
There is no other morality.
All this does not mean that any kind of agreement is impossible, only a voluntary agreement is impossible. As long as there is a spark of hope that they can get rid of us, they will not sell these hopes, not for any kind of sweet words or tasty morsels, because they are not a rabble but a nation, perhaps somewhat tattered, but still living. A living people makes such enormous concessions on such fateful questions only when there is no hope left. Only when not a single breach is visible in the iron wall, only then do extreme groups lose their sway, and influence transfers to moderate groups. Only then would these moderate groups come to us with proposals for mutual concessions. And only then will moderates offer suggestions for compromise on practical questions like a guarantee against expulsion, or equality and national autonomy.
I am optimistic that they will indeed be granted satisfactory assurances and that both peoples, like good neighbors, can then live in peace. But the only path to such an agreement is the iron wall, that is to say the strengthening in Palestine of a government without any kind of Arab influence, that is to say one against which the Arabs will fight. In other words, for us the only path to an agreement in the future is an absolute refusal of any attempts at an agreement now.