RD2003
Got a really fucking shitty attitude
Now that it is being speculated that Russia is scaling back its ambitions-not that they were clear in the first place, at least to us mere plebs, what can we expect to follow?
Although NATO and its individual components are, sensibly and mercifully, still holding back from committing to anything more than weapons supply and, relying on short-term memories, generally straining to look like the all-time good guys, I still fear that the prevailing appearance of a stalemate (strategically speaking) may be the lull before the storm. Russia might be trying to appear like it is saving face by declaring victory and halting further operations while biding its time until further assaults. If a renewed assault does come, will level heads in the west continue to prevail?
What is the meaning of the contradictory information we're being fed? On the one hand we have pushed at us the idea that Putin (suddenly the embodiment of the entire Russian elite-a feat not achieved even by Stalin in the much more controllable Soviet era- will not stop with Ukraine, and on the other that which says Russia is evidently too weak and dilapidated to even take Ukraine? Which is it to be?
How seriously should we take the notion that Russia, presumably isolated in every conceivable way for the forseeable future, may go for a scorched earth policy in relation to Europe or the west as a whole?
What is the potential for things to spiral out of control?
And when do we start to consider the role of the arms industry in both the expansionist project of NATO and the current, in my opinion wholly avoidable and tragic war? Where does this war fit into the general direction in which the world is heading?
Although NATO and its individual components are, sensibly and mercifully, still holding back from committing to anything more than weapons supply and, relying on short-term memories, generally straining to look like the all-time good guys, I still fear that the prevailing appearance of a stalemate (strategically speaking) may be the lull before the storm. Russia might be trying to appear like it is saving face by declaring victory and halting further operations while biding its time until further assaults. If a renewed assault does come, will level heads in the west continue to prevail?
What is the meaning of the contradictory information we're being fed? On the one hand we have pushed at us the idea that Putin (suddenly the embodiment of the entire Russian elite-a feat not achieved even by Stalin in the much more controllable Soviet era- will not stop with Ukraine, and on the other that which says Russia is evidently too weak and dilapidated to even take Ukraine? Which is it to be?
How seriously should we take the notion that Russia, presumably isolated in every conceivable way for the forseeable future, may go for a scorched earth policy in relation to Europe or the west as a whole?
What is the potential for things to spiral out of control?
And when do we start to consider the role of the arms industry in both the expansionist project of NATO and the current, in my opinion wholly avoidable and tragic war? Where does this war fit into the general direction in which the world is heading?
Last edited: