Its such a drop in the ocean.That's not an empty gesture. It increases demand for high welfare meat. Buying the odd bacon sarnie from Sid's Spoon doesn't negate that.
a londoner hacking away at a cow with his penknife, then hanging it up in his studio flat for four weeks to age.To a certain extent I think people should only be allowed to eat meat that they have killed and prepared!
Problem is that you can't win the argument that meat is wrong. Too many people are just fine with eating meat. But imo an argument centred on welfare, environment and sustainability can gain plenty of traction. But to do that you need to stop telling meat eaters they are doing an evil thing.
That'd be fuckin great. I'd quite enjoy that I reckon.
Kind of. Product of 1066, that.It is the disconnect we have between shrink wrapped meat in the supermarket and actual live animals on a farm that bothers me.
It is why we don't buy sheep rather we buy mutton, we don't buy cow rather we buy beef, we don't buy pig rather we buy pork. All organised neatly to disconnect us from what is actually happening.
I think we should all defer to the opinions of small children.I think if you stood outside McDonalds with a "pretty cow" and educated the little nippers about where their happy meal starts from then they might not be so keen.
Yes, I am aware the names didn't come out of some Machiavellian meat marketing board tactic. In fact I think we have discussed it on here before. Still the disconnect happens, at least I would argue it does.Kind of. Product of 1066, that.
Compared to the eggs in my tesco sandwich, the egg powder in all the groceries, the takeaway pizzas, kebabs, burgers, sausages, the meals out.
Yes. I agree that it makes a contribution to that disconnect.Yes, I am aware the names didn't come out of some Machiavellian meat marketing board tactic. In fact I think we have discussed it on here before. Still the disconnect happens, at least I would argue it does.
But there have been experiments to try to get people to pay for more expensive and ethically reared meats and people in the main revert to buying cheaply. I am not saying it is right but people are used to looking for value when they shop and the disconnect between animal welfare and value in the shops is real. It would be best if all meat was ethically raised.I object to this stance - but accept it's down to my personal beliefs regarding the sentience of animals. I think low welfare meat it absolutely unnecessary, shows no compassion, and it is ultimately disrespectful to use affordability as a justification for low animal welfare.
It is objectionable. But it is a mass movement I am afraid.If cheap meat was necessary for a healthy life I'd be more accepting, however the output of factory farming is generally processed meat, which as we have seen is probably detrimental to health. For some cost can always be used as a justification for cruel treatment of animals - if find this objectionable.
What particular animal welfare issues are you concerned about?I do appreciate that this point of view is crossing the line for some and moving into hectoring and preaching. However animals are powerless to change things. Humans have the capacity to stop a huge amount of unnecessary suffering by raising minimum levels of animal welfare.
But how would you go about persuading people who are used to eating meat a few times a week?Environmental impact is another issue. As far as I understand low welfare is often equates to low emissions. Battery chicken is one of the most efficient forms of using animals to provide nutrition. Personally I think the only solution is to eat higher welfare meat less often - or if people choose not to eat meat at all.
It is the disconnect we have between shrink wrapped meat in the supermarket and actual live animals on a farm that bothers me.
It is why we don't buy sheep rather we buy mutton, we don't buy cow rather we buy beef, we don't buy pig rather we buy pork. All organised neatly to disconnect us from what is actually happening.
Fuck off frances, fuck right off
But we don't buy mutton, we buy lamb.
Logic fail. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/02/0218_050218_human_diet.htmlWhat do you think incisors are for, eating celery?
Well according to most veggies meat is got from animals that are kept in cages and force fed, after being separated from mummy and daddy, despite this they will eat food containing animal byproducts and wear leather, at least vegans are ethically consistent.this is exactly it. most people don't give a fuck. half of meat eaters are hypocrites who don't care what happens to the animals as long as they don't have to see any suffering, and the other half get hard ons for animals being killed and fantasise about eating endangered species. fact.
fuck the lot of them. and don't get me started on vegans
I've never striven for 'ethical consistency' but I think people can - and have - made a difference by voting with their wallets/getting involved in campaigns when it comes to the ethics of the meat/animal industry.Well according to most veggies meat is got from animals that are kept in cages and force fed, after being separated from mummy and daddy, despite this they will eat food containing animal byproducts and wear leather, at least vegans are ethically consistent.
The bit where it was claimed that humans ate meat from the second they 'crawled out of the swamp.' HTH.What part of that are you suggesting bolsters your position?
That humans have only been eating meat for 2.5 million years?
can you explain the environmental damage of imported weed?E
Do you use recreational drugs?
If so you're doing far more social and environmental damage consuming coke and imported weed than those who like the odd well-sourced steak.
completely agree with you. Intensive and factory farming is disgusting, morally and ethically*. Having seen it once I am very careful about what I eat now- but I do still eat meat. And drink milk. Organic, free range, etc, but I still eat it. Everyone has their own ethical code, I guess[
I object to this stance - but accept it's down to my personal beliefs regarding the sentience of animals. I think low welfare meat it absolutely unnecessary, shows no compassion, and it is ultimately disrespectful to use affordability as a justification for low animal welfare.
If cheap meat was necessary for a healthy life I'd be more accepting, however the output of factory farming is generally processed meat, which as we have seen is probably detrimental to health. For some cost can always be used as a justification for cruel treatment of animals - if find this objectionable.
I do appreciate that this point of view is crossing the line for some and moving into hectoring and preaching. However animals are powerless to change things. Humans have the capacity to stop a huge amount of unnecessary suffering by raising minimum levels of animal welfare.
Environmental impact is another issue. As far as I understand low welfare is often equates to low emissions. Battery chicken is one of the most efficient forms of using animals to provide nutrition. Personally I think the only solution is to eat higher welfare meat less often - or if people choose not to eat meat at all.
The bit where it was claimed that humans ate meat from the second they 'crawled out of the swamp.' HTH.
these threads have been going on since before you were here and attached to spy's coat tails permanentlyGood point well made, thraigo - Another sterling contribution to the thread. Keep up the good work