Can u stop pissing with my username please cuntyAye, but nobody's taking you seriously.
Draigo quoting that lot says more about him than those he's quoted!
I'm the easier target tho
Except, errr, it works perfectly for me. I am happy to eat meat. I am perfectly happy to kill and prepare an animal for eating and have done so. If my long term dream of ending up in the countryside ever comes off I plan to keep a bird of prey and regularly hunt for the purpose of acquiring food for my table. My conscience is and will be clear.
I do, yes. An advantage of genuinely not really giving a fuck what others think about medo you get to decide if your own conscience is clear?
do you get to decide if your own conscience is clear? if so, what's the point of having a conscience? after all, almost no-one deliverately does stuff they think is wrong unless they believe themselves to have no choice. using your own conscience as a judge is kind of pointless, because you're always going to find yourself innocent. you should throw yourself before a jury of your peers, bees!
oh wait, isn;'t that what we''re doing?
No, I don't. Unless "and it tastes fucking great" is acceptable?You need additional arguments beyond meat eating being 'natural'
What objective standard do you base your moral decisions on then ?
Must be if you say it isNo, I don't. Unless "and it tastes fucking great" is acceptable?
No, I don't. Unless "and it tastes fucking great" is acceptable?
Well, what more do I/should I need? Let's take the example of me going off to live in the countryside - I raise a pig, keep it well fed in suitable conditions etc. When the time comes it becomes bacon. This process has harmed nobody. Unless you equate a pigs life with that of a human. And I don't.So far that's all you've got, because your point about it being 'natural' carries no moral salience. And 'it tastes fucking great' isn't a very good stand alone argument. You can think of your own counter-examples.
I didn't say they had you hysterical tit, I was stating my position.No one has equated the life of an animal with a human
No, of course not. Do I support hunting a fox for the sole purpose of entertaining a few people on horseback? No. Do I support the hunting of game that will be eaten? Yes.so what you're saying is that you can only cause harm to a human?
Stop projecting dearI didn't say they had you hysterical tit, I was stating my position.
But seeing as it's not technically necessary to eat them and they must have some pain from death then you are causing unnecessary suffering. Just that your wants come above that, pretty straightforwardI believe it is perfectly acceptable to eat animals but not cause them unnecessary suffering, neglect or pain. That clear enough?
That'd be fuckin great. I'd quite enjoy that I reckon.
I've killed and prepared a good range of animals. Its a bit horrible tos tart with. But you get used to it. And now I think nothing of it.
All though, I can't be fucked with plucking a bird ever again. Its a right fuck on
but you said the process of raising and slaughtering a pigs harms no-one.
how do you slaughter a pig without harming it?
But it doesn't help the vegetarian argument to say that somebody who eats a couple of dozen mussels is responsible for the deaths of 24 animals. It dilutes the argument and makes it weak and makes the person claiming it look ridiculous.shellfish have always been animals. according to science, that is.
But seeing as it's not technically necessary to eat them and they must have some pain from death then you are causing unnecessary suffering. Just that your wants come above that, pretty straightforward
Must be if you say it is