ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
This KCTMO, how does that work? it's run by the tennants themselves but it's also a private company?
It doesn't sound like a conventional Tenant Management Organisation, but like an Arm's Length Management Organisation, which is an entirely different thing. I'm not aware of any borough-wide TMOs in existence, so I expect this is just a name that RBKC has given to an ALMO which has tenant representation on the board, and has sub-committee "boards" (think "residents' associations") on each estate.
TMOs are, effectively, private companies, but if they've been constituted properly, they're fully constitutionally accountable - in a way that a council never is - to the residents of the TMO. For example, on the one I served on, any board member could be suspended for minor transgressions of the constitution, and removed after a disciplinary procedure. Something that bothers me about the Grenfell blog is that the blogger mentions that the TMO were re-elected (a proper TMO's mandate has to be regularly renewed by ballot) by proxy votes. I don't know of ANY TMOs that allow proxy votes - most use postal votes for vulnerable and mobility-impaired residents.