Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Glastonbury 2008

I think a lot of those reasons are perfectly valid - particularly those from people who were forced to go by coach if they wanted a ticket, and were quite badly let down by the service.

I also think they've shot themselves in the foot by releasing line-up details. Eavis blaming Jay-Z is hilarious - hope he pulls out :D
 
Must admit i didn't disagree with the fella on the first page who isn't going because Eavis said he wanted to attract more under 25s. I think that comment upset a lot of people who felt a bit let down when they thought they've been supporting the festival by attending and participating for many years...

To a large extent I do agree with this .... I just let that comment by Michael wash over me, because I'm an ultra stubborn 'wait for another hot and sunny year to go out with a bang on before I stop' type**. And I've been going long eniugh for it to be ALL about vibe not line up for me. But for a lot more poeple, that comment was crass and offensive, and it was VERY ill judged, and has been counterproductive.

**I really do sincerely think this makes so much bigger a difference than a lot of oldschool critics of Glastonbury acknowledge or accept -- the mud was a NIGHTMARE last year
 
To a large extent I do agree with this .... I just let that comment by Michael wash over me, because I'm an ultra stubborn 'wait for another hot and sunny year to go out with a bang on before I stop' type**. And I've been going long eniugh for it to be ALL about vibe not line up for me. But for a lot more poeple, that comment was crass and offensive, and it was VERY ill judged, and has been counterproductive.

**I really do sincerely think this makes so much bigger a difference than a lot of oldschool critics of Glastonbury acknowledge or accept -- the mud was a NIGHTMARE last year

speaking as an over 25 I tend to agree with it and tbh can't see why people are so upset about it.
 
I think a lot of those reasons are perfectly valid - particularly those from people who were forced to go by coach if they wanted a ticket, and were quite badly let down by the service.

I don't disagree, on that coach point specifically.

But people having legit criticisms for valid reasons like that, were far outnumbered on that thread by ranting twats spouting bile filled ignorance. Including people who'd never been yet still proclaimed their hatred of the whole Glastonbury thing. And several people moaning on about the growing commercialism/mainstreamness of Glastonbury then proclaiming their intention to go to Leeds/Reading instead! And people drivelling on about the shit lineup when less than a third of it is known yet and even less than that confirmed for sure. And people locking into this assumption that Glastonbury is inevitably bound to be a mudbath for ever more.

You've got jaded by the whole Glastonbury thing by now moose and in fact I genuinely respect your reazons because you know what you're talking about. But perhaps your jadedness is blinding you to the surely? obvious fact that a lot of people on that BBC thread were spouting ignorant prejudiced bollocks?

I also think they've shot themselves in the foot by releasing line-up details. Eavis blaming Jay-Z is hilarious - hope he pulls out :D

This would be a more valid criticism -- one I'd share -- if it wasn't for the point that the details were almost certainly released (more accurately, confirmed) because they had no choice -- those details were imminently about to be leaked anyway as I understand it.

For that, blame people in the relevant record companies/management/PR areas/'entourage' of the bands in question?

ETA : Who knows what he was trying to do when putting down his own lineup though -- bizarre!
 
I think that it was just too big last year. Too many people. And the dull bill this year is unlikely to help people forget last year's rain.
 
I think that it was just too big last year. Too many people. And the dull bill this year is unlikely to help people forget last year's rain.

My take on the overcrowding thing is that yes, it did seem, and was, pretty overcrowded last year. But the conditions had an awful lot to do with that. The site is huge and the infrastructure pretty well developed. Get a dry year, long overdue, and people will spread out more, be sitting around over a hugely larger mud free area, be moving quicker, not be confined to relatively narrow hard paths and roads when they are moving. (And also people will be more chilled, relaxed,, happier, laid back when there's no rain or mud! Sunny chilledness beats 'grimfacedly determined to have a good time despite the mudbath' spirit of Dunkirk any day!)

I was there in 2000 when the site -- a bit smaller then too! -- was filled by the largest -- by far -- crowd that Glastonbury has ever had, numbers swelled immensely by all the gatecrashers. Far more people overall than last year. Some say 225,000 or even 250,000 and I can well believe it. There were bottlenecks, slow movement, pinch points, scary moments, but at no time (as I recall) did the overcrowding seem as bad as it did at times last year. Reason? Dry conditions in 2000!

Had an absolutely great time that year actually :p
 
Well there's certainly a lot of general hostility to Glastonbury around -- for a very erm 'diverse' range of reasons (most of them prejuduced, ignorant and blinkered IMO).

Check that link if you have a bit of time ... some of those comments are well annoying ...

I read the first 2 pages. Admittedly a good few of the comments are ill informed & lineup-centric but I have to say I agree with the majority re the creeping commerciality, the total lack of atmosphere over the last couple of years, the sheer weight of numbers, the totally unacceptable littering & the Jo Whiley factor influencing the iPod generation & their bland homogenous twangy guitar bands. The Glastonbury I cared about is dead. It's a lot closer to the other major commercial festivals nowadays than it is to the genuine counter-culture festivals that still exist out there. It really is time to move on.
 
tbh, watching the Julien Temple film last week I realised just how far away from many of the images in that film last year's festival was.
 
tbh, watching the Julien Temple film last week I realised just how far away from many of the images in that film last year's festival was.

Couldn't agree more matey. When I first saw the film in 2006 I just couldn't wait to get back there to experience it all again. But then when I got there I realised the Glastonbury in the film doesn't actually exist anymore. It's still a great film - but only for nostalgia purposes.
 
Couldn't agree more matey. When I first saw the film in 2006 I just couldn't wait to get back there to experience it all again. But then when I got there I realised the Glastonbury in the film doesn't actually exist anymore. It's still a great film - but only for nostalgia purposes.

far be it from me to judge on appearances (OK, so a lot of the time it's not very far from me at all :oops: ) but I thought you could just tell in the film which bits had been shot in this century - the background Hooray Henry & Henrietta count was far higher.
 
The unmentioned M-factor again ....

I don't blame every drawback of last year on the mud/conditions by any means, some poeple are not going back for completely other reasons. And of course the film did show plenty of muddy scenes as well as idyllic ones anyway.

But I stick to my point that the conditions made much more of a difference to far greater number of people than some of us oldschoolers who are no stranger to mudbaths admit.

I would also argue that the commerciality of last year wasn't especially worse in 2007 than in the years from (to pick a random year out of the hat) from 2002 say.

I'm by no means a fan of corporate sponsorship creeping in and I share Tort's criticisms of some of it ... but how different was last year over 2004 or 2005, really?

Perhaps I prefer to think of the glass half full rather than half or more empty. Glastonbury still has many more positive features than negative IMO.

I love the smaller festivals, have plenty of criticisms of the behemoth Glastonbury has become, but I still think Glastonbury is a major part of my life that I'd be hard pushed to give up on -- for the moment anyway.

Give us a dry year to really test the spirit, the vibe, the crowdedness or not, what's unwelcomely different vs what's still good and enduring. And the bew stuff -- say Lost Vaguness being sacked and replaced by a thoroughly revamped area, may spice things up again loads. Proof of the pudding and all that.
 
far be it from me to judge on appearances (OK, so a lot of the time it's not very far from me at all :oops: ) but I thought you could just tell in the film which bits had been shot in this century - the background Hooray Henry & Henrietta count was far higher.

They're twats all right, but still a minority. You notice them (and I did too! :mad: ) because they're posh loud twats ... but they're easily avoided and much outnumbered.

Anyway, if Glastonbury is once more becoming less fashionable and less talk of the town amongst ligger/guestlister types, then there'll be fewer of them once more .... :p

They'll move on to Latitude or Bestival instead ;)
 
This proves absolutely nothing of course, but how the festival engages with urban75 may be a pointer to how things have changed.

A few years back they were only too happy to offer me cut price press tickets if I sent them an email, but now I have to hustle, hassle, badger and nag and can expect to be completely ignored unless I really, really, really go on and on.

I imagine having so much mainstream media in attendance there now means that there's a lot less room for their traditional, smaller supporters.
 
This proves absolutely nothing of course, but how the festival engages with urban75 may be a pointer to how things have changed.

A few years back they were only too happy to offer me cut price press tickets if I sent them an email, but now I have to hustle, hassle, badger and nag and can expect to be completely ignored unless I really, really, really go on and on.

I imagine having so much mainstream media in attendance there now means that there's a lot less room for their traditional, smaller supporters.

I'd agree with most of that, the way they messed you around last time was pretty shite ....

I've also had a thing for ages (ever since about 2003) about the way crew and performer numbers -- legit/working blagger numbers if you like -- have been cut to a major extent, so the old school element has been significantly reduced. I read somwhere how much Liz Elliott (Green Fields) had had to cut her crew/stallholder numbers, and also Kaka Tim posted a while back about how much harder it was to get passes to perform in the Circus etc. Fields, even if established performers.

The thought that such cuts in numbers have in part been replaced by more posh Kokehead liggers and backstage guestlister parasites may be a prejudice of mine but there's plenty circumstantial/impressionistic to support that ...
 
Eavis has dissed his hardcore fans, it wouldn't matter if it wasn't for the fact Glasto has become a big lie. He pointed at his own Emperors New Clothes. Now everyone's twigged.
 
Hi everyone!

For me in 2008 Lattitude can provide the nice safe chilled middle class no drug dealers to be seen anywhere experience. It will do it well with a lovely setting and small crowds.

Endorset can provide the sun drenched drug soaked festival experience.

With those two, coupled with nearly 10 days at Metaponto for Unsound 2008, I'm sorted.
:)

1044sg8.jpg
 
To a large extent I do agree with this .... I just let that comment by Michael wash over me, because I'm an ultra stubborn 'wait for another hot and sunny year to go out with a bang on before I stop' type**. And I've been going long eniugh for it to be ALL about vibe not line up for me. But for a lot more poeple, that comment was crass and offensive, and it was VERY ill judged, and has been counterproductive.

**I really do sincerely think this makes so much bigger a difference than a lot of oldschool critics of Glastonbury acknowledge or accept -- the mud was a NIGHTMARE last year

I think for many of the old-schoolers it's a combination or rather the culmination of ticket-hoop-jumping, international ticket crappiness, coach crappiness, followed by shite weather, lack of facilities to ease the impact of mud and overcrowding, (I could go on!) all being considerably rubbed in when having put up with all that and people being stuck in the car parks with no facilities which previously would have been brought in, the festival had a fair chunk more cash (16% price increase plus extra tickets) which clearly wasn't used to help negate the weather effects even to the level of previous years.

Nothing else is that HARD to get to, then it's hard work to raise that "Dunkirk spirit" day after day for the week, and year after year just recently. When you add it all up, (and you see posts every year of folk doing just that), in time, effort and money, and take into account most of us have limited annual leave, it's not so much being upset by Michael's comments as feeling he/it's gone too far downhill to get back to something where all the effort is worthwhile even if it's guaranteed to be 26 degrees the entire month of June. It's not the mud, Michael's comments or t-day stress, it's all of it. You need some very major plus points to be motivated to go, or less negatives. I'm as stubborn as fuck, but there's a lot more negatives/effort required for me to go than you***, so I'll forego the misery of all that and put up with going out on a muddy one. Everyone's reasons to go/not go are different and equally valid to them. My decision was actually made before last year's festival so neither Michael's comments nor the weather had an influence. The only thing that's surprised me is just how many of the die-hards feel the same way, but didn't realise it until there/leaving or weren't there and didn't feel half as bad about it as they expected.

William: WHY was the mud a nightmare last year? We've had mud more years than not recently and still kept going. Why wasn't it a nightmare previously?

***I realise the international thing doesn't seem that major, but try doing it sometime!
 
The 2007 weather was far worse than 2005 or 2004, and the extra people aggravated that situation.

One possible upside this year is that it looks like the site is getting it's biggest re-org for along time. More camping space is as good as definite.

I think with good weather, and - as a result of the lower registrations - a stronger concentration of people who really want to be there in spite of everything, 2008 might just turn out to be an unexpected winner.
 
I think for many of the old-schoolers it's a combination or rather the culmination of ticket-hoop-jumping, international ticket crappiness, coach crappiness, followed by shite weather, lack of facilities to ease the impact of mud and overcrowding, (I could go on!) all being considerably rubbed in when having put up with all that and people being stuck in the car parks with no facilities which previously would have been brought in, the festival had a fair chunk more cash (16% price increase plus extra tickets) which clearly wasn't used to help negate the weather effects even to the level of previous years.

Nothing else is that HARD to get to, then it's hard work to raise that "Dunkirk spirit" day after day for the week, and year after year just recently. When you add it all up, (and you see posts every year of folk doing just that), in time, effort and money, and take into account most of us have limited annual leave, it's not so much being upset by Michael's comments as feeling he/it's gone too far downhill to get back to something where all the effort is worthwhile even if it's guaranteed to be 26 degrees the entire month of June. It's not the mud, Michael's comments or t-day stress, it's all of it. You need some very major plus points to be motivated to go, or less negatives. I'm as stubborn as fuck, but there's a lot more negatives/effort required for me to go than you***, so I'll forego the misery of all that and put up with going out on a muddy one. Everyone's reasons to go/not go are different and equally valid to them. My decision was actually made before last year's festival so neither Michael's comments nor the weather had an influence. The only thing that's surprised me is just how many of the die-hards feel the same way, but didn't realise it until there/leaving or weren't there and didn't feel half as bad about it as they expected.

William: WHY was the mud a nightmare last year? We've had mud more years than not recently and still kept going. Why wasn't it a nightmare previously?

***I realise the international thing doesn't seem that major, but try doing it sometime!

You posting from overseas blues? :confused:

You make some fair and interesting points, but in answer to your specfic question about why Mudbath 2007 was so particularly hellish for me after so many other ones in the past, well paolo's answered that really. Last year was for me the worst Glasto mudbath EVER, only rivalled in Somme like hellishness by 1985 (so I hear), 1997 and 1998 -- and in the latter two years I was 34 and 35! I'd say 2007 was even worse than 1998 because, yes, there were far more people, and unlike in 98, the weather got steadily worse as time went on. Last year, the very worst mud built up on Sunday and Monday when people were already exhausted after 5 days of partying, getting caned, mudtrudging (most of the time), and (worst of all) sitting down being at such a total premium. And all this on top of 2004 and 2005, neither a TOTAL mudbath, neither nearly as bad as 2007, but both pretty skanky at times .... I'm resilient, I know how to enjoy and party and make the best of things, I'm experienced, and bring the right protective clothes, but BLIMEY was my longest holiday of the year in 2007 hard work towards the end!! Didn't help I suppose that last June I was going through a pretty bad phase personally .... but sunshine and NO MUD would have assuaged that so much better .... :(

I think I would feel seriously depressed if I failed to go this year and it was a sundrenched scorcher. Fuck me I'm owed!

I don't especially give a shit about the lineup, I always found the best things further down the bill on smaller stages anyway, and I'm already hearing good names being mentioned (for me things like King Blues, Slackers, Pama International, 3 Daft Monkeys etc etc and everyone else will have completely other preferences, there's so much for everyone). And there's lots more to come. If people don't like Jay Z they can see Massive Attack or loads of other stuff instead anyway . Leonard Cohen is a legend and this is a unique chance to see him. Can't wait to see Jimmy Cliff again and he WILL bring sunshine back :cool:. We'll be working this year for the first time -- new perspective, fresh outlook. Commerciality, well aspects of that are well shit, but there's STILL vast quantities of the less/non commercial stuff at Glasto. Lost Vagueness being shit last year? True, but it's been sacked and it's replacement looks VERY promising. Mainstream/conventional attituded crowds? I've always been less judgemental about that than some, if you go with as positive and open and friendly an attitude as possible, you will always meet/chat to/spend time with congenial positive people who bring something new to the party. Twats are easily enough avoided.

I think paolo's right just above, give us a modicum of sunshine and an absence of mud, and Glastonbury 2008 could well be a total winner, entirely contrary to all the jaded doom and gloom sayers who have IMO become far too locked into not just making legit criticisms (many of which I agree with) but writing the whole thing off and being almost incapable of saying anything positive about it any more -- I find such negativity really sad and annoying to the point of tedium be honest! And you know that's not at all because I think Michael Eavis/Glastonbury are beyond criticism or anything.

If you don't come, enjoy your other festivals (many of which I'll also be at, being lucky enough for an either/or decision not to be necessary this year). If you do head Pilton way, enjoy Glastonbury -- it's still fucking brilliant IMO, EVEN after last year!

Still needs old schoolers around, just doing me Festographer job! :p
For the 13th time in Glasto's case and I'm not jaded ...
 
The mud at Womad last year was much worse, deeper, stickier and achingly harder work because there were no seats at all and almost no hard paths. Yet coping mechanisms seemed a bit different (less whinging) and expectations of what the festival could/should deliver were less impatient. Because Glasto is so big, so successful people are less inclined to cut it a little slack. That might be fair enough- high paying consumers deserve only the best- but it doesn't quite add up to a sparkling bring what you seek to find atmosphere.

As for comparisons with previous years, I think the difference is the expansion of 'crew' areas with fencing and wristband/laminate only access. As I may have said before :)D) I'm no fan of gated communities and the elitists who think they somehow deserve special treatment, and trudging soulless, overcrowded paths is one of the consequences of their selfishness.

Where once you could walk cross country from place to place now you're forced to stick to the crowded paths because the backways don't work any more. And it is a trudge, and not a very joyful one. I don't think this aspect of the festival will change much even if the weather is kind, because we'll still have to trudge the same routes, because there are few alternatives.
 
'crew' areas with fencing and wristband/laminate only access. As I may have said before :)D) I'm no fan of gated communities and the elitists who think they somehow deserve special treatment

Niether am I, but in reality the crew areas at Glasto aren't what you are imagining. Public camping is generally in better locations, with better views, etc. Possibly the worst place is somewhere like main backstage. Some people think it must be something glamorous, because they can't go in there. The reality is it's mostly a load of trucks and working production staff - the least fun area of the festival.
 
As for comparisons with previous years, I think the difference is the expansion of 'crew' areas with fencing and wristband/laminate only access. As I may have said before :)D) I'm no fan of gated communities and the elitists who think they somehow deserve special treatment, and trudging soulless, overcrowded paths is one of the consequences of their selfishness.

Some of the backstage camping areas are LUDICRUOUSLY full, normally positioned badly (right by big generators running all night, for example) and generally quite shit. Theres nothing elitist or special about them
 
Some of the backstage camping areas are LUDICRUOUSLY full, normally positioned badly (right by big generators running all night, for example) and generally quite shit. Theres nothing elitist or special about them
The backstage area at Glasto we were in last year had tents packed ridiculously close to each other.
 
The backstage area at Glasto we were in last year had tents packed ridiculously close to each other.

Same for where me and memespring were. We were right behind the speakers for the stage we were working on, a load of generators going 24/7 and when the deluge of rain came most of it ran down the tented arena and landed on us and the other people working there :mad:

The only good advantage about backstage camping is access to cleanish bogs and a shower :cool:
 
The brief period I spent backstage at Glastonbury featured the biggest mud swamp and the foulest toilet of any place I have ever visited in my 32 years on this earth.
 
Niether am I, but in reality the crew areas at Glasto aren't what you are imagining. Public camping is generally in better locations, with better views, etc. Possibly the worst place is somewhere like main backstage. Some people think it must be something glamorous, because they can't go in there. The reality is it's mostly a load of trucks and working production staff - the least fun area of the festival.

yes I know they're horrible, but that doesn't stop them being desirable nor stop them spreading. Some some people really do need to be there 24 hours, but most don't because their 'job' or lig or whatever simply isn't particularly crucial. These days the people who actually need to camp in Pyramid backstage get caravans- anyone in a tent or dogkennel is likely a poser, only camping there to rub shoulders with other liggers. Other stages crew aren't treated so well, so that rules of thumb doesn't apply universally.

But it's not just the seriously foul places, the fences have spread far and wide- Greenpeace, ever increasing chunks of the Greenfields, Avalon, LV and so on (a lot more than is shown on your map, which btw has a minor bug in the 'crew & ops' backstage areas overlay) .

My alltime favourite field was colonised a few years back for kids crew camping- why? tbh I don't really understand why everybody on a crew feels they need somewhere special... why can't Oxfam or WBC or whoever camp with the public?

anyway, silver linings and all... there's a ranking for clean toilets, with Pyramid backstage right at the bottom and other, much less posey, areas scoring far better :)
 
Back
Top Bottom