wiskey
Albatross Admirer
William of Walworth said:Good. I hope that Roy/LV can add to possibilities that Michael/Glastonbury might SACK Clear Channel, the corporate scum!
depressing thought innit
William of Walworth said:Good. I hope that Roy/LV can add to possibilities that Michael/Glastonbury might SACK Clear Channel, the corporate scum!
moose said:Having said that, the likelihoood of him getting a licence on his own is very slim. He took on Mean Fiddler because the council wanted him to share responsibility/liability. I'd guess he'd have to sigh up another partner.
Crispy said:Yes it is seeing as there's been a year off every 5 years since 1991
Although I doubt anyone chez Eavis was particularly displeased with that!
moose said:Having said that, the likelihoood of him getting a licence on his own is very slim.
wiskey said:it wasnt just the eavis' - the rest of the crew were getting a bit worn down. and they needed to watch the footy
Velouria said:I have seen people claim a public right of way does run through at least part of the site
Glastofreak said:http://www.answers.com/topic/glastonbury-festival
An interesting article about Glastonbury that goes on to say that the live side of Clear Channel Entertainment has been sold off to form a new company called Live Nation with a UK subsiduary Live Nation UK. Information on Live nation can be found here
http://www.answers.com/topic/live-nation
There is a part of me that thinks that the new company has been set up to confuse the issue of Clear Channel but looking at all the interests they have this is probably not true. Glastonbury is only one festival, the biggest and best but only one, a company as large as Live Nation has plenty of other fish to fry. So will ME go with Live Nation, someone else (possibly with MB involved), or say sod it, I know how its done, thanks for the information, we will do it ourselves?
Live Nation has done some terrible things such as
In 2002, Clear Channel was sued by the US Justice Department for not allowing people with diabetes to bring medically necessary supplies, including syringes used for insulin, into concert venues. Clear Channel changed their policy shortly afterward.
But if they did work for ME I wuld have thought that there exact involvement would be carefully worked out before hand.
An outside group would also need carefull negotiations as to there boundarys also would they have the necessary experiance?
The do it yourself option has one major problem would the local authorites allow ME to do it himself?
William of Walworth said:Just had a cast around TOS message forums and can't find the relevant bit relating to Melvin Benn ..... not very familiar with the layout of that forum though ....
William of Walworth said:The question of what's going to happen for 2007 is still unclear, a little bit of it appears in part to have been answered though. I'm told, secondhand, that Melvin Benn** will be taking at least a month off in 2007 to help with Glastonbury.
Should be in a field myself then. Might have to give that a pass.wiskey said:glastonbury the film will be on bbc2 on saturday (15th) at 10:30pm
The old 1971 film (Glastonbury Fayre) or the new film?wiskey said:glastonbury the film will be on bbc2 on saturday (15th) at 10:30pm
wiskey said:glastonbury the film will be on bbc2 on saturday (15th) at 10:30pm
William of Walworth said:Is this the Julian Temple film for sure???
William of Walworth said:Is this the Julian Temple film for sure??? The one released earlier this year and which I never managed to get it together to get to the Ritzy for???
(There's another, older, Glasto film, not necessarily the 1971 one because there was a more recent one than that, both of which are moderately to better than that good, but neither of which I'm so desparate to see again .... )
William of Walworth said: