Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Gammon is not racist

Ffs. A lot of point missing going on here. The original post (of mine on another thread) pointed out that Gammon is currently used by some Asian kids to pejoratively refer to white people, any white people, and that I have given one of my nephews a bollocking for using it in that way. In that context it IS racist, notwithstanding that it may not be when used in other contexts.
 
Last edited:
Ffs. A lot of point missing going on here. The original post (of mine on another thread) pointed out that Gammon is currently used by some Asian kids to pejoratively refer to white people, any white people, and that I have given one of my nephews a bollocking for using it in that way. In that context it IS racist, notwithstanding that it may not be when used in other contexts.
I think it's still an open question whether the 'racism' is the most useful term for that kind of prejudice (i.e. against the dominant culture).

Is it racist when black people say white people don't season their food?
 
Ffs. A lot of point missing going on here. The original post (of mine on another thread) pointed out that Gammon is currently used by some Asian kids to pejoratively refer to white people, any white people, and that I have given one of my nephews a bollocking for using it in that way. In that context it IS racist, notwithstanding that it may not be when used in other contexts.


oh god - dont go around introducing notions like "nuance" and "depends on the context" ....
 
Ffs. A lot of point missing going on here. The original post (of mine on another thread) pointed out that Gammon is currently used by some Asian kids to pejoratively refer to white people, any white people, and that I have given one of my nephews a bollocking for using it in that way. In that context it IS racist, notwithstanding that it may not be when used in other contexts.

If white people use it to take the piss out of other white people, it's not racist (I think). Or at least, not intended to be.
 
I think it's still an open question whether the 'racism' is the most useful term for that kind of prejudice (i.e. against the dominant culture).
Well if you accept that racism can be levelled at people of a dominant culture, and you'd be stupid not to, then that's exactly what it is. In that context it is a term of mockery based on the colour of someone's skin. How's that not racist?
 
Ffs. A lot of point missing going on here. The original post (of mine on another thread) pointed out that Gammon is currently used by some Asian kids to pejoratively refer to white people, any white people, and that I have given one of my nephews a bollocking for using it in that way. In that context it IS racist, notwithstanding that it may not be when used in other contexts.

You called a woman who filmed a tirade of racist abuse towards shop workers, a fuckwit, for using the word gammon in her tweet. Do you reckon that racist fucker would be offended by that? Would he have thought that as racist towards him? I doubt he fucking would to be fair, whilst he was frothing at the mouth shouting & swearing for blacks to fuck off back home.

This whole thread has come about due to that.
 
Nation of Islam is a movement that was set up in the US and is clearly a reaction to the vicious racism black people were suffering there. But that doesn't mean it isn't itself a racist ideology. When it classifies people by race and labels certain races 'devils', it is being racist. It is a racist reaction to racism. What else could it be?
 
Is punching someone who has just punched you the same thing? A reaction to violence is different to that initial violence. Not that hard a concept to understand, surely?

And a term based around someones expressed political viewpoint (which is where the term came from) is a tad different to discrimination based purely on someones skin colour.
 
You called a woman who filmed a tirade of racist abuse towards shop workers, a fuckwit, for using the word gammon in her tweet. Do you reckon that racist fucker would be offended by that? Would he have thought that as racist towards him? I doubt he fucking would to be fair, whilst he was frothing at the mouth shouting & swearing for blacks to fuck off back home.
I was pointing out the hypocrisy of a young Asian woman calling a white bloke a racist gammon.

Had she called him a racist cunt/fuckwit/something else, she'd have had my wholehearted support. Whether or not the bloke would have been offended is neither here nor there.
 
Is punching someone who has just punched you the same thing? A reaction to violence is different to that initial violence. Not that hard a concept to understand, surely?.
There can be many different reactions to an action. If your reaction to racial prejudice is itself a form of racial prejudice, that's racial prejudice. That doesn't deny anything about the causes of racism or the forms it takes in the world, but you need to perform some rather weird mental gymnastics to defend the idea that Nation of Islam's belief system is not a racist belief system. Why would you even want to?

Turn that on its head: Nation of Islam is not racist because of the power dynamics of the USA. Therefore it is possible to hate a whole group of people because of their race without it being racist. It is possible to hate an individual because of the racial group you think they belong to without it being racist. That doesn't work, does it?
 
There can be many different reactions to an action. If your reaction to racial prejudice is itself a form of racial prejudice, that's racial prejudice. That doesn't deny anything about the causes of racism or the forms it takes in the world, but you need to perform some rather weird mental gymnastics to defend the idea that Nation of Islam's belief system is not a racist belief system. Why would you even want to?

Turn that on its head: Nation of Islam is not racist because of the power dynamics of the USA. Therefore it is possible to hate a whole group of people because of their race without it being racist. It is possible to hate an individual because of the racial group you think they belong to without it being racist. That doesn't work, does it?
It's a rather simplistic description of NoI, but, even that withstanding, a reaction to racism is different to the initial racism. To say they are the same thing (which 'they're all racist' does) is mistaken, and does nothing to counter racism or NoI's prejudices.

The woman who slaps her abusive husband, who has beaten her up for years. Is she a domestic abuser, same as him?
 
Back
Top Bottom