Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Gammon is not racist

Using gammon as a descriptive tag is racist, not that I care, the outrage that it causes provides excellent entertainment for me.

No its not , the power structures behind racism that allows one group to oppress another eg white on black do not operate in reverse , as the oppressed group (generally) will not have the power to discriminate aginst their oppressors.

This is why so called "reverse racism" called against policies such as affirmative action initiatives is such bollocks and a false right wing trope.

The use of gammon is offensive and pejorative ceftainly but not racist, anyone who says it it needs to revisit fundamentally what thier idea of racism is and how it operates on a broader power based scale.
 
Speaking as a white balding male in my 50s, I do not find gammon offensive to me, because I do not hold the views that go with the term. It's about having a go at the white male privilege that allows such men to get away with voicing their offensive views without any repercussions. As Smangus says, it's to do with where the power lies. Yes, it's offensive, but I find the views held by gammons to be offensive, so fuck 'em.
 
No its not , the power structures behind racism that allows one group to oppress another eg white on black do not operate in reverse , as the oppressed group (generally) will not have the power to discriminate aginst their oppressors.

Yeah. There’s nothing racist about grown south Asian men thinking white girls are ‘sluts’ for dressing immodestly and using that as justification to rape them.
 
Indeed, that's just straightforward extreme levels of violent misogyny being acted on, the same behaviour which has happened since before Britain was even a name.

There might be something racist in linking that sort of dangerous social conservatism exclusively to South Asian men while ignoring the fact that rape as a phenomenon, almost always using the same tropes, is and always has been in the vast majority committed by white guys with no south Asian links whatsoever.

That's the sort of thing folks can do when all the major institutional structures in our society allow for targeted vilification of minority groups which then have minimal leverage to defend themselves though I guess.
 
Yeah. There’s nothing racist about grown south Asian men thinking white girls are ‘sluts’ for dressing immodestly and using that as justification to rape them.

You're absolutely right, its the result of worst form of cultural sexism and predjudice, not racism.
 
You're absolutely right, its the result of worst form of cultural sexism and predjudice, not racism.

Culture and ‘race’ are inextricably linked though. It’s the equivalent of our (white) racists fixating on the wearing of hijab, which I doubt you wouldn’t argue isn’t a racist position.
 
No its not , the power structures behind racism that allows one group to oppress another eg white on black do not operate in reverse , as the oppressed group (generally) will not have the power to discriminate aginst their oppressors.

This is why so called "reverse racism" called against policies such as affirmative action initiatives is such bollocks and a false right wing trope.

The use of gammon is offensive and pejorative ceftainly but not racist, anyone who says it it needs to revisit fundamentally what thier idea of racism is and how it operates on a broader power based scale.
Agreed, but the point troubling me about the use of the term is that it is a pejorative dependent on skin colour (race?).
As such, I don't think its use represents the smartest way to challenge those who do harbour prejudice based on that very basis. Someone up thread did use the term 'hypocritical' and I think those using the term 'Gammon' to categorise racists/bigots do lay themselves open to that accusation. If any of the 'gammon' were smart enough to see the irony of calling out their racism on the basis of their colour, I'm sure they'd be the first to say that it therefore (in some warped way) legitimises their prejudice.
 
Culture and ‘race’ are inextricably linked though. It’s the equivalent of our (white) racists fixating on the wearing of hijab, which I doubt you wouldn’t argue isn’t a racist position.

even if racism against white people existed what is the political utility of calling asian predators racist? it's a gift to the far right and an obfuscation of the sexual politics involved
 
what is politically inconsistent? not singling out offenders of a certain background, downplaying sexism in favour of racism?

Are objections against the wearing of hijab racist? According to you that downplays the sexism (I’d argue it can be both).
Asian men calling white girls ‘sluts’ for dressing immodestly is therefore also both racist and sexist. The inconsistency is to argue one is racist but not the other.
 
Are objections against the wearing of hijab racist? According to you that downplays the sexism (I’d argue it can be both).
Asian men calling white girls ‘sluts’ for dressing immodestly is therefore also both racist and sexist. The inconsistency is to argue one is racist but not the other.

I see, you don't know what racism means.

Are objections against the wearing of hijab racist?

they usually are when coming from white people. context is a thing.
 
I see, you don't know what racism means.

they usually are when coming from white people. context is a thing.

Well if you’re of the view that only white people can be racist then your logic makes sense. Otherwise...

And far from handing something to the right I think what’s being handed to them is giving them the space to appear to be the only ones saying the blindingly obvious.
 
Well if you’re of the view that only white people can be racist then your logic makes sense. Otherwise...

And far from handing something to the right I think what’s being handed to them is giving them the space to appear to be the only ones saying the blindingly obvious.

you think racism is a bad attitude instead of a material reality. and you're arguing we should adopt right wing arguments to appease the free tommy crowd?
 
you think racism is a bad attitude instead of a material reality. and you're arguing we should adopt right wing arguments to appease the free tommy crowd?

I’m arguing that it’s more useful to point out the similarities between white fascists and non white ones than to simply pretend it can only exist for one of those two groups.
 
It's a pejorative term for white people often used by some PoC, particularly youngsters. Like honky or cracker.

Can't remember the last time I went down the shops without a horde of brown youth yelling 'honky' at me.

Oh no wait, it was every time. Every single day of my life I've not been subjected to abuse because of the colour of my skin. If that applies to you too, which it absolutely does, then I reckon probably shut the fuck up.
 
Back
Top Bottom