TheHoodedClaw
acknowledging ur soup leg
There are a load of people who look like that in this country though. They don’t all believe the same things.
Yes, I know.
There are a load of people who look like that in this country though. They don’t all believe the same things.
There are a load of people who look like that in this country though. They don’t all believe the same things.
This, with the further, specific qualification of skin colour.We’ve done this before on here and my position remains that it is bad politics to conflate simeone’s physical appearance with their views.
true, you could find 9 bods like that at TUC conf within one audience camera shot ( and another one here replying to yr post at present) , but isn't there implied , specific socio- political critiique embedded in 'gammon' as well, even if it's as as blunt as ' another angry white, middle aged, right wing bloke ' ?
We’ve done this before on here and my position remains that it is bad politics to conflate simeone’s physical appearance with their views.
used inI thought gammon was a descriptive term for ruddy faced chubby chaps that was used in the 1800's, not necessarily racist in that context.
Does that mean it's not racist?It’s used by plenty of white people (liberals and the left) also (mostly?).
Moderately well-tailored, surely
But not one who looks like George Clooney. It has a person's particular looks attached to it. At best, it's on the same level as 'chav', from what I can tell, only having heard of it today.true, you could find 9 bods like that at TUC conf within one audience camera shot ( and another one here replying to yr post at present) , but isn't there implied , specific socio- political critiique embedded in 'gammon' as well, even if it's as as blunt as ' another angry white, middle aged, right wing bloke ' ?
Policemen trying to fit inMen in 'ill fitting suits'
That definitely - and with some classist assumptions in the mix as well.I think Gammon is a comforting term for some younger left-wing people. But not a useful one.
So it's a subset of 'chav', then. An older chav gentleman.That definitely - and with some classist assumptions in the mix as well.
So it's a subset of 'chav', then. An older chav gentleman.
So it's a subset of 'chav', then. An older chav gentleman.
Does that mean it's not racist?
dunno really.
i'm not keen on the term 'gammon' and even less so on 'chav' but i'd sort of got the idea of 'gammon' being more the daily mail / express types who vote ukip and who used to think the bnp had a point but were too lower class to vote for...
What, like Chrysallis > Butterfly?So it's a subset of 'chav', then. An older chav gentleman.
Yeah but skin colour; not a great place to start from, is it?i thought gammons were usually more c1, c2 daily mail/express readers. small business owners, shopkeepers and what not. "aspirational working class/artisan/clerical" - pompous, self important, judgmental, "charity begins at home", envious and definitely tory. the miserable old cunt who wouldn't give you your ball back.
not racist. the skin complexion is from getting all hot under the collar cos "WHY CAN'T WE JUST LEAVE!!??!", bring back the birch and corbyn not being very keen on thermonuclear armageddon.
Yeah but skin colour; not a great place to start from, is it?
Yeah but skin colour; not a great place to start from, is it?
Old white blokes with a heart condition. Yeah, brought it on themselves.In the original gammon gallery, quite a lot of the skin colour is self-inflicted rather than inherent.
Yes, fuck 'em...fine...for saying/behaving/voting etc in the way that they do. But...there's far better pejorative terms that one that focuses on their skin colour. I think most on here would instinctively steer away from any other insults that related to that innate characteristic, so why make the exception/set the precedent with this (fairly lame) term. We can do better than that.its appropriate - angry blokes - red faced.
tbh - fuck em. they're cunts.