Gammon is not racist

[Wilf]

To be honest, I like to think of myself as a passive aggressive cunt. Does that give me any credits towards the full BSc Hons Gammon-Salty Joint Honours Award?

 

[Pickman's model]

To be honest, I like to think of myself as a passive aggressive cunt. Does that give me any credits towards the full BSc Hons Gammon-Salty Joint Honours Award?

30 points towards your target of 360

 

[SpineyNorman]

symbolic castration, war toys are phalluses in imperialist psychosexuality

I get your point and kind of agree to an extent but you somehow manage to phrase everything in a manner that is simultaneously patronising and tedious.

 

[Wilf]

30 points towards your target of 360

To be honest, I failed the core brexit module. Will I get a 2nd referendum resit opportunity?

 

[Pickman's model]

To be honest, I failed the core brexit module. Will I get a 2nd referendum resit opportunity?

yes

 

[Wilf]

yes

And will there be any remoaners writing guardian articles telling me what a racist I am support over the resit period?

 

[Pickman's model]

not if you use that tone again

 

[lucillemara]

I get your point and kind of agree to an extent but you somehow manage to phrase everything in a manner that is simultaneously patronising and tedious.

nukes are like willies

 

[SpineyNorman]

nukes are like willies

I'd go doctors and get my willy looked at if I was you, that's not normal.

 

[Wilf]

nukes are like willies

More metaphor, less simile!

 

[Monkeygrinder's Organ]

To be honest, I like to think of myself as a passive aggressive cunt.

Well, of course, you would like to think that, wouldn't you?

 

[mojo pixy]

To be honest, I like to think of myself as a passive aggressive cunt. Does that give me any credits towards the full BSc Hons Gammon-Salty Joint Honours Award?

Depends if you weaponise your whiteness so as to increase your cuntitude .. if you can work out how to, without actually tearing your skin off and chucking bits at people.

 

[rekil]

I'd go doctors and get my willy looked at if I was you, that's not normal.

An intersectional workers weapons industry will disdain backward and pseudo scientific notions such as 'aerodynamics'.

 

[mojo pixy]

nukes are like willies

One said, ''I came and my other half rose a foot off my body from the power of my ejaculation''
One said, ''I came and my other half flew across the room from the power of my ejaculation.''
But the other said, ''I wiped my cock on the curtains and levelled a small European city.''

 

[Pickman's model]

An intersectional workers weapons industry will disdain backward and pseudo scientific notions such as 'aerodynamics'.

They may revive the auld soviet project of steam-driven aircraft

 

[Athos]

One said, ''I came and my other half rose a foot off my body from the power of my ejaculation''
One said, ''I came and my other half flew across the room from the power of my ejaculation.''
But the other said, ''I wiped my cock on the curtains and levelled a small European city.''

Krakow?

 

[mojo pixy]

Nice.

 

[Treacle Toes]

Depends if you weaponise your whiteness so as to increase your cuntitude .. if you can work out how to, without actually tearing your skin off and chucking bits at people.

We've had a very good example of how to do that in the last 24 hours on this very thread.

 

[Wilf]

An intersectional workers weapons industry will disdain backward and pseudo scientific notions such as 'aerodynamics'.

 

[Wilf]

An intersectional workers weapons industry will disdain backward and pseudo scientific notions such as 'aerodynamics'.

 

[mojo pixy]

We've had a very good example of how to do that in the last 24 hours on this very thread.

Among all the weaponised language on this thread I may need the specifically white bit pointing out to me. Is it that bit where heebyjeeby (or whoever that is) startied on about the indigenous working class.

I understood that to mean the working class of native-born British, including BaME people born in Britain - as opposed to all those WC forrins coming over here n took are jobs etc.

It's not a distinction I tend to make, working class to me means working class from wherever living wherever. I think it's a dubious distinction to make. But I didn't think, as you did, that it was code for White People Working Class, more that it was code for British People Of Any Shade Working Class.

That's just interpretation, I'm not saying which is better. I'm not sure anyone's been weaponising race here except for lucillemara , and that's clearly their style.

 

[Athos]

I understood that to mean the working class of native-born British, including BaME people born in Britain - as opposed to all those WC forrins coming over here n took are jobs etc.

... But I didn't think, as you did, that it was code for White People Working Class, more that it was code for British People Of Any Shade Working Class.

The poster explicitly confirmed they were talking about white working class people.

I am using them to describe a specific group of white people ie those of the British Non Metropolitan,proletariat/lumpen proletariat.

 

[mojo pixy]

OK fair enough, I missed it. I skipped a lot of the bickering.
So is that weaponised? Not sure.
But it is 'race-specific', I accept that.

 

[lucillemara]

I think bringing up "muslim rape gangs" and anti-white crime was weaponising race
things have implications beyond what they literally mean or what people intend and with the long history of fascist appropriation of socialist rhetoric and socialist parties embracing liberal racism to their doom there needs to be a keener eye for it than there currently seems to be

the idea or implication that taking race seriously in a structural sense is liberal or anti-working class is also weaponising race and it can't be challenged often enough even though it's tedious and repetitive

 

[Athos]

OK fair enough, I missed it. I skipped a lot of the bickering.
So is that weaponised? Not sure.
But it is 'race-specific', I accept that.

I think it exposed a bias. Not sure I'd go so far as to say it weaponised race.

 

[lucillemara]

OK fair enough, I missed it. I skipped a lot of the bickering.
So is that weaponised? Not sure.
But it is 'race-specific', I accept that.

it's weaponised specifically to literally whitewash and essentialise the working class (by implication at least) turning it into a narrow abstraction for browbeating the real people excluded from it, and to drive a wedge between the class over alleged irreconcilable differences, a common rhetorical move I hate that tries to disavow itself as it's made so that to argue against it will always be missing the point, it's also literal identity politics of the worst (proto-fascist) kind

 

[mojo pixy]

OK. heebyjeeby , you're up.

 

[Ax^]

nukes are like willies

has Valve been posting on this thread

 

[heebyjeeby]

I think bringing up "muslim rape gangs" and anti-white crime was weaponising race
things have implications beyond what they literally mean or what people intend and with the long history of fascist appropriation of socialist rhetoric and socialist parties embracing liberal racism to their doom there needs to be a keener eye for it than there currently seems to be

the idea or implication that taking race seriously in a structural sense is liberal or anti-working class is also weaponising race and it can't be challenged often enough even though it's tedious and repetitive

Muslim grooming gangs are a reality and no amount of posturing makes it go away and they were a racist endeavour. They were enabled by police,social workers and local government for a variety of reasons fear of being called racist being an obvious one. Class not race is the defining issue. Idpol itself is a liberal position popular amongst the monied middle classes of the USA

 

[Treacle Toes]

OK fair enough, I missed it. I skipped a lot of the bickering.
So is that weaponised? Not sure.
But it is 'race-specific', I accept that.

Using terms such as indigenous/traditional/working class as code to mean White, excludes everyone else who fits those descriptions. It places value on 'Whiteness' and positions it as powerful. This is nothing new. a lot of institutionialised racism has done the same thing for centuries now. Make something 'invisible' by never actually naming it whilst exalting it as the default perspective. So yeah, weaponised.