Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Gammon is not racist

There is fuck all socialist about using terminology like traditional, indigenous and working class as code for White. There's no solidarity in that. It's you placing value and the concerns of some people above others that can all describe themselves using those terms by erasing them altogether in your discourse. Saying that doesn't make me or anyone else AmericanIDpol obsessive though it does expose the very exclusive nature of your so called socialism and reveal piss poor attempts to hide your own IDpoliticking perspective.

So yeah...speaking of parody...pot, meet kettle.
Agree with you entirely about the word indigenous. Don't find it useful even at a descriptive level and has some biological echoes that are even less palatable. But with the rest of it - the rest of the issue, not your post - I think intention is key, where different people use the same terms for very different political purposes. Firstly, class should mean class, a category that describes a wide group of people who vary by age, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and the rest --but stand in a common relationship to capital and to other social classes. It's legitimate, proper and even necessary at times to note those differences, but actually raising part of that whole - 'white working class' - to the point where it becomes your dominant identity or politics is, well, racist.

Similarly when it comes to noting the impact of migration, I have no problem with terms like 'British working class' or 'existing working class', to distinguish the impact of change on different groups, the way that the working class is always diverse and always changes. Equally, there's no reason not to even get into difficult discussions about migration, globalisation and jobs for example (the bosses have no problem discussing it). But again, it's about political perspective, class loyalties and intentions. If your starting point is to suggest migrants and the 'existing working class' have fundamentally different interests, there's something deeply wrong with your politics. If your aim is carry on looking for solidarity and to continue the struggle, there isn't. [sorry Rutita1 that a bit random, not really a reply to you]
 
It's legitimate, proper and even necessary at times to note those differences, but actually raising part of that whole - 'white working class' - to the point where it becomes your dominant identity or politics is, well, racist.
It’s worth pointing out that outlets like the Guardian, the BBC, and so on, all discuss “the white working class” as if it is obviously a discrete, homogenous entity. I don’t even mean to discuss people for whom that is an identity they assume, but as if it’s a common sense category. And that, too, is literally racist.
 
No surprises those two mouthpieces for the liberal wing of the capitalist class routinely use the term "white working class". No doubt they'd claim to be using it "sociologically" rather than papers like the Sun and the far right using it in an obviously racist way. It's still bullshit though. Class is not an identity, a color, a gender, an accent or how dirty your hands get at work. it's the overarching capitalist social relationship we are all bound to. Working class, meaning those of us who do not own or control the means of production and who have to sell our labour power to an exploiting boss class is the only definition worth a toss.
 
It’s worth pointing out that outlets like the Guardian, the BBC, and so on, all discuss “the white working class” as if it is obviously a discrete, homogenous entity. I don’t even mean to discuss people for whom that is an identity they assume, but as if it’s a common sense category. And that, too, is literally racist.
Good article by Kenan Malik in, um, The Guardian about this.

In British education, the central issue is class, not ethnicity | Kenan Malik
 
Yeah fair enough, Britain is that kind of place. Indigenous means native so not settled from elsewhere, but if someone settles and their kids are born native then IMO the kids have the right to call themselves indigenous, because that's what they are.

Using indigenous as code for 'white' is extreme-right sophistry, based on conflating indigenous with aboriginal. And as everything coming from that source, it's shite.

Which is why I prefer simply 'British'.
 
symbolic castration, war toys are phalluses in imperialist psychosexuality

williams.jpg
 
Why would getting rid of Trident diminish the nation?

Our move out of the nuclear club, loss of the ability to project power etc. Looking at it rationally though, whether it is desirable or not; and that is certainly up for debate; we cannot afford it. We would never have fired first, and a retaliatory strike is a little pointless when your land glows in the dark.
 
How about 'salty' as a new term to describe the views of gammons and gammon-like people?

"I had no wish to spend another morning frowning over eggs and bacon while Guppy Dinsdale rehearsed his rather salty views on various political debates." - P.G. Wodehouse, What The Actual Fuck, Jeeves?
 
wow a tory is talking more sense than anyone in the liberal media on this

I'm a pragmatist, always have been. When what the country wants is interfering with what the country needs, then the needs must come first.

Now is not the time to be scrimping on education. We are in for a very rocky ride post Brexit, our NHS etc are dependent on workers from abroad, and it takes time to train people.

Brexit - What a complete clusterfuck. Politicians quoting x% done and dusted, but not one single detail published, not one.
 
Salty already has an extended meaning when referring to people that some of us aspire to. Here I am trying to be interestingly coarse and all of a sudden I'm a gammon? Fuck that.
 
Back
Top Bottom