lucillemara
Member
speaking of liberals enabling fascism
speaking of liberals enabling fascism
It was a cover up by police, social services and local politicians scared of being called racist...by people like you...thereby allowing the issue to fester and people assuming a more sinister agenda. I am not at all worried about your absurd use of the word.
the gammons of the world have literally destroyed everything and we are doomed. this is not a joke.
fash: the jews are importing subhuman foreigners to take our [sic] women and destroy the white race!!
libs: are these sketchy looking foreigners coming for our women, as these controversial but charming populists claim? we believe in free speech, so let's hear them out and counter them by agreeing but more calmly, this is the only other acceptable side of the debate
"the left": if we don't take this seriously we'll never win over the working class, which is white and racist and separate from us, and ignoring their legitimate concerns is identity politics, so let's follow suit and make sure the discourse is free of any anti-racism and systemic critique of patriarchy and our beloved police, because socialism is about winning over the workers and keeping them under our thumb so we can educate them for their moral improvement and liberate them from their most pressing hardship, being called racist by guardian readers
There are large parts of the left you've overlooked, and which actively resist the sort of attitudes and behaviours you've described.
You are an utter parody. I'm a socialist. too bad I don't have your Americanocentric idpol obsessionsthe gammons of the world have literally destroyed everything and we are doomed. this is not a joke.
You are an utter parody. I'm a socialist. too bad I don't have your Americanocentric idpol obsessions
You are an utter parody. I'm a socialist. too bad I don't have your Americanocentric idpol obsessions
And now the thread gets even more ridiculous.Are you a national socialist, then?
Britain being the mixed up place it is though, I'd call anyone born here 'indigenous' regardless of their ethnic background.
It isn't a must to use words in the same way fascists use them. Indigenous doesn't mean aboriginal, there are no aboriginal people in the British isles, but anyone born here IMO has the right to call themselves indigenous. Like native, it's code for 'born here', not code for 'white'. No reason at all that BaME and mixed-heritage people can't be indigenous.
*Pages Sasaferrato, just for the lols.*
On this we completely agree.If you think I'm reading 34 pages of disjointed bollocks... life is too short
Britain being the mixed up place it is though, I'd call anyone born here 'indigenous' regardless of their ethnic background.
It isn't a must to use words in the same way fascists use them. Indigenous doesn't mean aboriginal, there are no aboriginal people in the British isles, but anyone born here IMO has the right to call themselves indigenous. Like native, it's code for 'born here', not code for 'white'. No reason at all that BaME and mixed-heritage people can't be indigenous.
Oh God.Are you a national socialist, then?
Whether someone was born here, or settled here, I call them British.
Sorry, whatever your point may be, it just passed overhead at 30,000 feet.
If you think I'm reading 34 pages of disjointed bollocks... life is too short. (I'm 66 you know.)
that's the beauty of urban, no one needs a clue before weighing in on threadsobvious point, but when has not having a clue what a thread is about ever stopped you weighing in ?
Hysterical maoist idpol call out thought police.Edgy new posters adding spice to the discourse
/
sadly notI thought it was a Fall LP