lucillemara
Member
was the haitian revolution racist against white people?
Good job nobody has done that then.I'm saying people shouldn't use the word in obfuscating ways to downplay white supremacy
Lots of long words I don't understand then poorly worded abuse.anyway fuck white people, kill them all. ban me you cunts.
lots of long words they don't understand then poorly worded abuse.Lots of long words I don't understand then poorly worded abuse.
Bit lame really.
you should have said that to start withanyway fuck white people, kill them all. ban me you cunts.
Easily understood. Pithy.you should have said that to start with
alternatively they could have just looked at their hands. and you seem to have missed the entire chivalry / military service thing among the ruling classesRight off the top of my head, and I'm ready and willing to be corrected because this is guesswork, I'd say that in Europe where manual agricultural work made people go brown then a way of spotting people who lived off surplus value was that they managed to remain 'gentle men' and 'fair ladies'. It was how to spot people who didn't work, or who worked without getting dirty.
alternatively they could have just looked at their hands. and you seem to have missed the entire chivalry / military service thing among the ruling classes
I just did
no one else seems interested in why the concept of whiteness exists
was the haitian revolution racist against white people?
nothing to do with that, you're on about people from the lower orders being tanned / dirty. so would campaigning or practicing soldiers.So fighting on a horse was more noble than fighting on foot, because it showed you had a horse.
And could run away more easily!
You're right about hands, but they couldn't be seen from such a distance.
When I used to take racial abuse as a kid I used to get incredibly frustrated that there were no insults for white people of equal weight that I could respond with, so I get why today's PoC youngsters are co-opting some of these terms. In most cases it's seen as retaliatory but that doesn't make it right or even effective in achieving their aims. In many cases I disagree that one shouldn't descend to an opponent’s level as it's quite often an effective tactic. I use it frequently. With regards to racist language though, it propagates stuff like "it's ok to be white" and perpetuates the nastiness.As I said before it's highly tempting to give people who bandy around words like 'snowflakes, cucks, remoaners' as if that was a sensible thing to do a bit of their own medicine, but really it's descending to their level of discourse.
Athos asked you a question above. Why not have a go at debating with him? He often has more patience than others.Imperialism leaves behind germs of rot which we must clinically detect and remove from our land but from our minds as well. - Fanon
The problem of the twenty-first century, then, is the problem of the color-blind. This problem is simple: it believes that to redress racism, we need to not consider race in social practice, notably in the sphere of governmental action. The state, we are told, must be above race. ... We are led to believe that racism is prejudicial behavior of one party against another rather than the coagulation of socioeconomic injustice against groups. If the state acts without prejudice (this is, if it acts equally), then that is proof of the end of racism. Unequal socioeconomic conditions of today, based as they are on racisms of the past and of the present, are thereby rendered untouchable by the state. Color-blind justice privatizes inequality and racism, and it removes itself from the project of redistributive and anti-racist justice. This is the genteel racism of our new millennium. - Prashad
So fighting on a horse was more noble than fighting on foot, because it showed you had a horse.
And could run away more easily!
You're right about hands, but they couldn't be seen from such a distance.
my answer would be yes, that is vaguely what I'm getting at
Yeah, so what.
Zero interest after that prior response.assadism and rape are both awful, so either we drop them both or we take what we can use and drop the rest, both valid responses
do you disagree with the quote? it seems fairly self evident to me