coley
Well-Known Member
Ta, though looking at the wiki figures I posted 18% seems towards the higher end.
Why in the world would they take notice when your strategy insulates them from the consequences. Have you got any examples of where voting for the lesser evil worked in that way? Because I think it's pretty obvious that it's precisely because of lesser evilism that social democratic parties have been able to (up to recent times) maintain their electoral grip while selling out their principles.
I would have thought by now they would have had a meaningful look at the political 'direction of Travel' and mebbes decided to avoid the pitchforks and guillotines scenario? Or possibly they think bought and paid for security services will save them and their gated homes and insulated lifestyles?
Hopefully LP will lose, but after seeing Teeside elect Tory mayor, owts possible