belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Maybe he's 'extrapolating'Why do you say I'm putting the election above all other concerns?
I honestly don't it
Maybe he's 'extrapolating'Why do you say I'm putting the election above all other concerns?
I honestly don't it
One or the other of them will form the next government though. That's the reality of this moment, so how can refusing to tick a box to stop Le Pen taking power next week be helpful to anyone apart from le Pen.Nobody is saying abstaining is the answer. They're saying the answer lies away from the choices presented at the ballot box.
No, one of them will become President. And they will then have to cohabitate with a government made up of other parties.One or the other of them will form the next government though. That's the reality of this moment, so how can refusing to tick a box to stop Le Pen taking power next week be helpful to anyone apart from le Pen.
One or the other of them will form the next government though. That's the reality of this moment, so how can refusing to tick a box to stop Le Pen taking power next week be helpful to anyone apart from le Pen.
This isn't an election for the government.One or the other of them will form the next government though. That's the reality of this moment, so how can refusing to tick a box to stop Le Pen taking power next week be helpful to anyone apart from le Pen.
This isn't an election for the government.
No they don't. They choose a PM, and approves ministers, but only from the parties that can command a majority. Thus the June elections become even more important, and why actively endorsing Macron would weaken any possible opposition.The president forms the government.
No they don't. They choose a PM, and approves ministers, but only from the parties that can command a majority.
No, one of them will become President. And they will then have to cohabitate with a government made up of other parties.
Tactical voting may feel grubby, but it can be the least worst option. Sometimes, that can be crucial to avoid the terrible "worst worst" option.Aargh. I'll never understand / accept the argument that abstaining makes sense because of the long view somehow.
I do know that this brings out some of my most paranoid irrational feelings though, the 'would you hide me in your attic' shit.
No I haven't. I've explained why you are grossly oversimplifying the process. A President Le Pen couldn't simply impose a government that she wants.You just explained how something you claim doesn't happen happens.
No I haven't. I've explained why you are grossly oversimplifying the process. A President Le Pen couldn't simply impose a government that she wants.
You are using the word 'form' in a way no one else does.No, but she would form the goverment, which is all anyone has said.
Tactical voting may feel grubby, but it can be the least worst option. Sometimes, that can be crucial to avoid the terrible "worst worst" option.
Idealism is fine, but not everyone is in a position where they can prioritise the "long view" over the here and now.
If I was in France I would probably vote for Macron. If I thought there was a chance Le Pen could win I certainty would. But that is not the same thing as endorsing him or giving him my support as some people are insisting we must. I would not push or 'call' for people to vote for him. The closest thing to my side just lost the election. How others on my side choose to use their vite now is a purely individual choice. there is no one left to vote in favor of.Why do you say I'm putting the election above all other concerns?
I honestly don't get it.
Abstaining is not any kind of an answer to the problem. it neither delays nor prevents.
If I was in France I would probably vote for Macron. If I thought there was a chance Le Pen could win I certainty would. But that is not the same thing as endorsing him or giving him my support as some people are insisting we must. I would not push or 'call' for people to vote for him. The closest thing to my side just lost the election. How others on my side choose to use their vite now is a purely individual choice. there is no one left to vote in favor of.
Except Macron is. He is saying - unlike Chirac in 02 - that he wants people to vote for him, not against Le Pen. He will interpret all votes in that way. Given only a quarter of voters actively support him, you can understand why he has to say that, but it also means someone like Melanchon can't endorse him.You sum it up in the first two lines. The rest is drivel. No one is saying vote in favour of. It's way past that point.
Like most of your posts then.The rest is drivel.
And his programme will not only fail, it will fail in a way that can very readily be exploited by Mme. Brony. And that's why it would be a very bad idea for those who oppose both her programme, and his, to get into bed with him.Except Macron is. He is saying - unlike Chirac in 02 - that he wants people to vote for him, not against Le Pen. He will interpret all votes in that way. Given only a quarter of voters actively support him, you can understand why he has to say that, but it also means someone like Melanchon can't endorse him.
Except Macron is. He is saying - unlike Chirac in 02 - that he wants people to vote for him, not against Le Pen. He will interpret all votes in that way. Given only a quarter of voters actively support him, you can understand why he has to say that, but it also means someone like Melanchon can't endorse him.
If I was in France I would probably vote for Macron. If I thought there was a chance Le Pen could win I certainty would.
Will the FN grasp power if the Le Pen wins. Do you actually know what position this election is for?No one is putting it above all concerns. French people will continue agitate and organise and resist, but the task is surely harder, the risk to individuals greater, if the FN grasp power.
Has anybody advocated abstaining as an answer?Why do you say I'm putting the election above all other concerns?
I honestly don't get it.
Abstaining is not any kind of an answer to the problem. it neither delays nor prevents.
Like how voting LD stopped the Tory gov in the UK? Or voting PSOE in Spain stopped the PP forming government? Or voting Green or Labour in Ireland stopped austerity governments? Or how voting SDP in Germany kept Merkel out?Tactical voting may feel grubby, but it can be the least worst option. Sometimes, that can be crucial to avoid the terrible "worst worst" option.
jog on with this. Its just a 'white socialists don't care' thing from you, we're all out of date fossilised marxists who will happily game the system even though that means people must suffer. Seriously, do one with that. I've had it enough over brexit. Your short-termism defeats everyone. Your opposition to 'idealistic' radical choices defeats everyone. Leave it out. You'd rather kick it down the road than vote left, and fuck your sadface too. As if it aint the left (of all colours and creeds) these people come for first...Idealism is fine, but not everyone is in a position where they can prioritise the "long view" over the here and now.