Recent French history would suggest they have a point.
Pretty accurate, qualities most politicians, French and non-French, have in spades.
Newsweek says Piketty is backing Melenchon:
Economist Thomas Piketty says he'd rather vote for Mélenchon than Macron in the French elections
I've seen stuff saying that JLM hopes to renegotiate the EU treaties that govern deficit reduction. Anyone know anything more about that one?
In the campaign you have proposed a critical strategy towards the European Union — a Plan A to reform it from within but a Plan B to exit if this does not work.
Jean-Luc Mélenchon was the first to bring a real response to what happened to Tsipras in Greece. No one had really formalized the idea that in order for there to be negotiation you have to be psychologically prepared to break it off. Otherwise you are not really negotiating. This is the origin of Plan B.
It is a quite basic proposal. If you go looking for a job, or you demand a wage increase, and you say “I will not work unless you pay me five thousand dollars a month” but in truth are prepared to work for one thousand, that is not a negotiation. If, conversely, you tell yourself you really will not accept less than three thousand dollars, that you would go and look for another job, then you really are negotiating, because the guy facing you understands that he will lose you. That is conceivable at the level of everyday human relations, but no one on the European left had thought seriously about how to apply it at the level of European negotiations. All of the large forces thought, “We will negotiate but stay whatever happens.”
To run a campaign on the basis of having a Plan B is a departure and it is important. Plan A already speaks about fiscal and social harmonization, that means having a framework which is not setting workers into a generalized competition, but on the contrary allows a better quality of life for everyone. And if that is not possible, then we will do the same thing — a harmonized framework — with those who are willing. And that principally means targeting the countries of the European south. Putting monetary and economic policy, and public investment, back into open discussion. We face challenges, such as the ecological question, of planetary importance. So it we must have supranational action.
But the recent experience of the European Union is proof that first of all we have to resolve the problems with our own domestic oligarchy. Rather than divide political life between those who are for leaving the European Union and those who are for liberal Europe — and that is the dividing line the far right draws — we have drawn a dividing line between the French people and the oligarchy. The far right simply wants to destroy the European Union, we want to make people see what is wrong with it.
ffs I just read that.Meanwhile, the Guardian thinks we should all know about the human side of Marine Le Pen:
Marine Le Pen: the estranged daughter tied to a very public life | profile
What the fuck is wrong with these people?
May be an outlier, but look...
Blog Scan Research / Le TerrainJL. Mélenchon devance de peu M. Le Pen.
Mélenchon on 22%, second only to neoliberal paper tiger Macron
En Marche more like in retreat!
Isn't the margin of error in these polls generally +/-3%In the latest polling via wiki, Mélenchon now polling neck and neck with Fillon around 19-20 %, Macron out front, Le Pen fading a little. Didn't seem likely a while ago that Melenchon could challenge, but with Hamon on the slide, who knows?
Still a fair level of uncertainty wrt spoiling/abstention. I suspect that might contain some shy FN voters, but who knows? It might contain a few who think that for once there's someone worth voting for who'll turn to Melenchon.
true, but the direction of travel in the polls is clearIsn't the margin of error in these polls generally +/-3%
Yeh. This direction of travel, do you have any proof for its actual existence?true, but the direction of travel in the polls is clear
polls last month putting him on 10 and now on 20Yeh. This direction of travel, do you have any proof for its actual existence?
I was thinking of proof of the general concept. But I'd be interested in seeing more of your working that e.gpolls last month putting him on 10 and now on 20
??
3% margin or not thats lift off
The tv debate the point where he took off
I guess he'd lost to macron in the head to head as fillon's voters would go to macron. But who knows?
A choice between Le Pen and Mélenchon in the presidential run-off on 7 May would likely lead to record low turnout and unprecedented gains for the far right. Those who admire from afar should keep that in mind.
kin ell. Grauniad has gone full-on Melenchon is as bad as Le Pen!
He must be doing well to get them that rattled.
It does show them up and is all too predictable. Any sign of actual socialism and they're straight on the case warning against it.Most of the most right-wing writers in the graunid. Pure scum.
bearing that in mind Hamon should really should stand down now....it does look like Melenchon has got his gain directly from Hamonean-Luc Melenchon, whose polling has leapt from 10-11% to around 19% now. In so doing, the official Socialist party candidate, Benoit Hamon, has seen his vote slump to 6-7%
Melenchon would also renegotiate the EU treaties, ignore the EU fiscal austerity pact, call for a devaluation of the euro, take national control of the Banque de France from the ECB and leave NATO and the IMF. And following Le Pen, if these measures are blocked, he would have a referendum on EU membership.
Melenchon’s program is similar to that of socialist Francois Mitterand (although somewhat less radical than Mitterand’s) when the latter won the presidency in 1981. He too wanted to take France on an independent line from the rest of Europe in expanding the economy through public spending, nationalisation and more taxes on business and the rich. That program fell down in face of the deep global slump in 1980-2, when financial investors fled France and the franc. The choice then was for Mitterand to go the whole hog and take control from French capital or capitulate to neoliberal policies. He chose the latter with his so-called “tournant de la rigueur” (austerity turn) in 1983. That choice would soon face Melenchon, in the unlikely event that he won the presidency.
Apart from the economic utopianism of Le Pen and Melenchon under capitalism, they both face an immediate political problem. In June, the French vote for a new National Assembly, which, at least right now, would probably elect a majority of conservative pro-capital, pro-EU MPs who would be backed by a media campaign from big business, the EU Commission and other EU governments aiming to shackle the new president. The battle would be on from day one, while the euro and French financial assets reel from the shock.
But it probably won’t happen.
That said Ive read little about Melenchon or a good breakdown of his policies, just bits here and there.
Asking the important questions.Liberal ideology is great
Asking the important questions.
Greater diversity clearly neededDid you know that a disproportionate number of published holocaust deniers are men?!?!