Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

French Presidential elections

please don't tell me there's any chance whatsoever of Fillon limping on as a widely discredited establishment insider - it'll be a Hillary Clinton scenario all over again... :eek:
 
C0NvFmDXEAI88ho.jpg:large
 
I take it there is little prospect of either Melenchon or Hamon withdrawing in favour of the other.?

They have around 25 per cent between them enough to get into the second ballot with Hamons vote going down and Melenchons inching up.

Presumably if they did a deal not all of the non runners vote would transfer to the other.
 
I take it there is little prospect of either Melenchon or Hamon withdrawing in favour of the other.?

They have around 25 per cent between them enough to get into the second ballot with Hamons vote going down and Melenchons inching up.

Presumably if they did a deal not all of the non runners vote would transfer to the other.

Either this has already been debated out and noone can be asked to tell me a relatively new poster or its a bit tricky right now comrade-I am really busy lancing the cats boil,maybe next month.
 
I take it there is little prospect of either Melenchon or Hamon withdrawing in favour of the other.?

They have around 25 per cent between them enough to get into the second ballot with Hamons vote going down and Melenchons inching up.

Presumably if they did a deal not all of the non runners vote would transfer to the other.
No actual signs of it happening that Ive seen, but commentators say its a possibility.... still time for this to happen. I expect if it happens it will be quite late in the day, what with the shifting sands.

And its presumed Melenchon would stand down for Hamon, rather than vice versa
 
So Mélénchon should just fall into line? That's the same line the centre-left have been using for the last century, You buy it then you're saying everybody should just go to the PS/Labour/ALP/Democrats, the same parties that have been attacking them.
i take your point
 
So Mélénchon should just fall into line? That's the same line the centre-left have been using for the last century, You buy it then you're saying everybody should just go to the PS/Labour/ALP/Democrats, the same parties that have been attacking them.
There is also a dynamic that people who vote centre are less likely to vote far, where as people on the far are more prepared to vote center, as a compormised step to their own long terms strategic aims... thats true of the right as it is of the left.

Lets say Melenchon and Hammon were both polling 15%, but needed a combined 30% to win.
Melenchon standing down and encouraging a vote for Hammon would be more likely to reach 30% than vice versa.
Voters have created that dynamic above all else, no?
 
There is also a dynamic that people who vote centre are less likely to vote far, where as people on the far are more prepared to vote center, as a compormised step to their own long terms strategic aims... thats true of the right as it is of the left.

Lets say Melenchon and Hammon were both polling 15%, but needed a combined 30% to win.
Melenchon standing down and encouraging a vote for Hammon would be more likely to reach 30% than vice versa.
Voters have created that dynamic above all else, no?
I'm not sure I agree with the first paragraph, at least not in the case of all other things being equal. People voting Labour as an anyone but the Tories vote (change depending on country) has more to do with Labour ruthlessly attacking any left-wing alternative, ensuring they are 'the only realistic alternative' (often with the electoral system helping them) than a natural inclination in "far"-left voters to vote centre. When there is an alternative, I'd say centre voters are as likely to move as those further from the centre. The meltdown in the Liberal vote and the massive gains of SNP last election, ok there's no movement to "far" options but in both case you have a big movement away from the "centre".

And I'd certainly disagree with it in respect to the right, most BNP support came from non-voters rather than from Tories (I'm not sure there wasn't more drift from Labour to the BNP than from Tory, but don't quote me on that, I'll have to go and check). Disaffected Tories did make up the largest group of UKIP support but I'm not sure that's still the case, and they are certainly now attracting voters both from the centre-left and from non-voters.

In light of all that I can't agree with the last sentence at all.
 
it was 10 v 18 last i looked a week back
iirc

In the immediate aftermath of the PS primary. There is always a bounce after these things - largely due to response bias IMO.

I've double checked and I was a whole percentage point out. The gap is 3-4% depending on pollster.
 
A lot of the 7.6% "others" there would be to the Left, no?

No, they're not. The biggest chunk would be a centre-right party callled Modem (I don't think they have decided whether to stand a candidate or not) and then a UKIP-ish party called Debout la France. Then there are two far-left parties, Lutte Ouvrière (Trots) and Nouveau Parti Anticapitaliste (trade unionists), but they are only polling about a percent between them, and the Greens, who are polling about a percent.
 
No, they're not. The biggest chunk would be a centre-right party callled Modem (I don't think they have decided whether to stand a candidate or not) and then a UKIP-ish party called Debout la France. Then there are two far-left parties, Lutte Ouvrière (Trots) and Nouveau Parti Anticapitaliste (trade unionists), but they are only polling about a percent between them, and the Greens, who are polling about a percent.

Ah..

I'd though both LO and the NPA would be polling better than that :(
 
So Mélénchon should just fall into line? That's the same line the centre-left have been using for the last century, You buy it then you're saying everybody should just go to the PS/Labour/ALP/Democrats, the same parties that have been attacking them.

That's probably the view of some of Mélenchon's supporters. But it's not as if Mélenchon himself has dedicated his life to resisting the centre-left. He was in the PS for 30-odd years. He was a minister. Then he left out of disillusionment that support for the left candidate in the PS leadership election was so low. And guess who that candidate was? None other than Benoit Hamon. So now the wheel has turned, why wouldn't it be logical for Mélenchon to lend a bit of tactical support? It's a much more common thing to do in the French system than in ours.

It's possible that he will, although I don't think it looks particularly likely. But the reasons will be about political calculation.
 
Thanks very educational(well for me at least).

Shows the big weakness of the two rounds of voting system compared with PR systems imo.
 
(I remember a Lib Dem party activist once angrily telling me that if we hadn't stood for election, they wouldn'be beat Labour.

I said the same could be said about them standing. Which wasn't strictly true as it was across a lot of our non-target areas. It did get the expected apoplectic reaction though so... :D)
 
Thanks very educational(well for me at least).

Shows the big weakness of the two rounds of voting system compared with PR systems imo.
Something like the London mayoral election would work for France's presidential election, I would have thought. 1st pref, 2nd pref, maybe even a 3rd pref. That means that nobody need abandon Melanchon, for example, in order to make their vote count.

Still might not lead to a favourable result in this instance, though. I would suspect that such a system would lead to a Macron victory, although the current system may well do that too.
 
Back
Top Bottom