friendofdorothy
Solidarity against neoliberalism!
So handy to have a name for this things, so you can call it out.Yup friendofdorothy, 'manrepeating' used to happen in many meetings. Fuckem !
So handy to have a name for this things, so you can call it out.Yup friendofdorothy, 'manrepeating' used to happen in many meetings. Fuckem !
just wanted to put this here. I recall being ignored in meetings only for a man to make the same point and be listened to.
Hate to be pedantic but I think the essential characteristic of manrepeating is stating the point as if it was your own, so IMO you are innocent and supportive if you say you agree with someoneI have been the man in that position - although I did say 'I agree with [her]'
Hate to be pedantic but I think the essential characteristic of manrepeating is stating the point as if it was your own, so IMO you are innocent and supportive if you say you agree with someone
Thiss just happened to a colleague of mine......been in so much pain for a long time, put down as IBS when in fact she had a fairly large tumour on her ovaryWhat has pissed me off today? Allow me to share.
It has been identified that women need some sort of loyalty card that can point to the fact that they have all the symptoms of ovarian cancer. Because they will have been buying various indigestion remedies.
Now. The woman in the article had been to her GP with all the syptoms of ovarian cancer for two years apparently, and had been told that she had IBS. However, what she did incorrectly was that she was turning up and telling the doctor with her own lady mouth that she had indigestion and was getting through a lot of Gaviscon. Whereas what she needed for some reason was a loyalty card to do it for her.
Shop loyalty card data may help spot ovarian cancer
Because telling a doctor isn't enough to be believed apparently.
I definitely feel this. Spotted it on the Nicholas Bulley thread tooIve been thinking that here on urban, alot of mainly female voices (and trans, NB etc too) are simply drowned out but the sheer weight of of masculine blather cloging up pages and pages of threads, the online equivalent of liking the sound of their own voices, to the point of derailing or making threads unreadable.
The last few pages of feminism and a world designed for men thread being an example.
I felt this on the world without meat thread - lots of male posters (and to the best of my knowledge most also being white, without children and having no disabilities that impact food choice), continuously arguing about a few narrow ethical points. I made a post bringing intersectionality into food choice and whilst a couple of people were interested to hear about ARFID, it was mostly tumbleweed.Ive been thinking that here on urban, alot of mainly female voices (and trans, NB etc too) are simply drowned out but the sheer weight of of masculine blather cloging up pages and pages of threads, the online equivalent of liking the sound of their own voices, to the point of derailing or making threads unreadable.
The last few pages of feminism and a world designed for men thread being an example.
In my case I accept what you are saying. And will say no more except sorry for pissing people off.Ive been thinking that here on urban, alot of mainly female voices (and trans, NB etc too) are simply drowned out but the sheer weight of of masculine blather cloging up pages and pages of threads, the online equivalent of liking the sound of their own voices, to the point of derailing or making threads unreadable.
The last few pages of feminism and a world designed for men thread being an example.
I've no idea what intersectionality in food choices would mean and I'd love to hear more about it. Can you start a thread please then we can discuss just that?I felt this on the world without meat thread - lots of male posters (and to the best of my knowledge most also being white, without children and having no disabilities that impact food choice), continuously arguing about a few narrow ethical points. I made a post bringing intersectionality into food choice and whilst a couple of people were interested to hear about ARFID, it was mostly tumbleweed.
Mind you, as I’ve got older I’ve found that I’m not interested in having polarised arguments where no one ever budges in their opinion. I’d much rather thoughtfully explore the grey and the nuances that exist.
I'd also be interested in that Agent Sparrow. Not seen the thread you have mentioned.I felt this on the world without meat thread - lots of male posters (and to the best of my knowledge most also being white, without children and having no disabilities that impact food choice), continuously arguing about a few narrow ethical points. I made a post bringing intersectionality into food choice and whilst a couple of people were interested to hear about ARFID, it was mostly tumbleweed.
Mind you, as I’ve got older I’ve found that I’m not interested in having polarised arguments where no one ever budges in their opinion. I’d much rather thoughtfully explore the grey and the nuances that exist.
Ok, I have various things to do today but will see if I can write an encompassing enough OP in between tasks. Where would that go though? General? Suburban?I've no idea what intersectionality in food choices would mean and I'd love to hear more about it. Can you start a thread please then we can discuss just that?
Yes in my experience the world is all shades of grey and rarely black and white.
I'm looking forward to this thread!Ok, I have various things to do today but will see if I can write an encompassing enough OP in between tasks. Where would that go though? General? Suburban?
Put it in Inthe same forum be as the without meat thread you mentioned.Ok, I have various things to do today but will see if I can write an encompassing enough OP in between tasks. Where would that go though? General? Suburban?
Nah that’s climate. I think kalidarkone ’s suggestion of general is good.Put it in Inthe same forum be as the without meat thread you mentioned.
You are worrying needlessly. No doubt it will have a life of its own and be what it will beNah that’s climate. I think kalidarkone ’s suggestion of general is good.
Bit worried it’s been a bit built up now though…
Every day's a school day, I've done some basic training in finance but still hadn't realised there is special finance for girls ! Just how stupid is my pink fluffy brainz !!!Fairly sure this fits on this thread. This guy is definitely a man, by the way, biologically and as they identify.
Every day's a school day, I've done some basic training in finance but still hadn't realised there is special finance for girls ! Just how stupid is my pink fluffy brainz !!!
E2a not having a pop at you scifisam, not in the least
Interesting thread, seemed to provoke the full range of engagement, outrage, mocking, what aboutery, blokey scuffles and general bun fight.
.Interesting thread, seemed to provoke the full range of engagement, outrage, mocking, what aboutery, blokey scuffles and general bun fight.
Interesting that telling a bloke to fuck off (surely that is standard urbz behaviour?) I was asked if I seriously hated all men
Oooooh hell yes. I have about a thousand and one examples at work. Especially in Teams meetings, actually, they seem to magnify the issue. People speaking to me irl are generally more respectful of my opinion, especially if we're on site and I'm wearing hi vis (go figure.) But Teams meetings are an absolute male-dominated nightmare. What's said on site has real life consequences, Teams meetings are usually just people enjoying their own voices.Ok good women of urban (and n/b and trans) - it's well documented how in most media / public spaces / meetings etc men take up more than 50% of the time.
Has this happened to you at work / in public meetings?
Or in a thread you have tried to join in?
So what can we do?
Can we share strategies for how to fight / avoid / deal with this?