Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

F1 2019

Ferrari seem to have got away with a lot this race, the jump start rule is clear, you can't move, Vettel moved :mad:
As for Leclerc we all watched what happened
 
There have been some odd steward calls of late. I am all for 'hard racing' but taking another car out is different.

Also the stewards should have called the jump start in the first lap. Strategies can be worked around these things.
 
I’m all for not penalising drivers if their “jump start” results in no advantage, but agree that past precedents have always been that any movement prior to the lights attracts a penalty.

I guess the investigation into LeClerc and Verstappen will be about whether LeClerc could have avoided the contact, or if he just understeered into Max despite steering away from him. Agree with Badgers, “hard racing” can’t be allowed to turn into bumper cars.
 
I’m all for not penalising drivers if their “jump start” results in no advantage, but agree that past precedents have always been that any movement prior to the lights attracts a penalty.

I guess the investigation into LeClerc and Verstappen will be about whether LeClerc could have avoided the contact, or if he just understeered into Max despite steering away from him. Agree with Badgers, “hard racing” can’t be allowed to turn into bumper cars.
There is nothing in the rule for jump start about gaining an advantage or not, it is you jumped or you didn't and clearly he did :confused:
 
Did they just display the wrong race results on screen? Had Perez still in the top ten and therefore Stroll was in P11??!
 
Lecrash's penalty sounds about right.

A small slap on the wrist for schumachering another car off the track, which led directly to that car's retirement.

A double-slap on the wrist for ignoring instructions from his team (and no doubt coming from the stewards themselves), shedding lethal shards of carbon fibre, strong enough to smash off Hammy's right wing mirror.

Does this mean the stewards, in their ever-changing form, have rescinded Lecrash's carte blanche to schumacher other cars off the track at will, or was that indulgence merely granted for a Ferrari driver at the Italian GP, or does it mean the stewards are a hopelessly inconsistent bunch of semi-professionals with a poor sense of proportion?

Answers on a postcard, care / of Jean Todt.
 
just catching up what an odd race

does Gunter get a refund the Stewerds having a shit show today


plus Ferrari lucky not to get a bigger fine for all the parts flying around

more so when you remember massa
 
I’d love to know what led race control to declare initially that the LEC/VER crash on lap 1 did not require an investigation and how this came to be overturned. Did the stewards invoke their prerogative to investigate whatever they like, even if not referred from race control, or did someone get on the phone to Michael Masi and tell him to sort it out?

The post race protest from Racing Point re Renault’s brake bias system is interesting. I wonder just how Racing Point know so much about how Renault’s brake adjust system is working?
 
Perhaps the stewards initially saw just a coming together on the opening lap and applied the Whiting principle: "It's a start; let 'em race."

The serious damage to Max's car only became apparent later when he retired. No doubt Red Bull got on the Bat-phone. Ditto Mercedes.

But the announcement to investigate came long after Lecrash ignored orders to box, and long after Hammy actually lost a mirror to the debris flying off the Ferrari. So what was initially okay about these transgressions, but later became serious enough to warrant a double-wrath time penalty?

Honestly, I don't think the stewards have a clue about what to let slip and what to punish. It seems to me that waving flags and issuing mild reprimands, and waffling about for dozens of laps instead of clear and (especially) quick determinations is milquetoast management. Changing their mind - doubtless under pressure from the victims' teams - is a sign they haven't got a clear understanding of what's required of them.

I fully support the Gunter Steiner manifesto!
 
Back
Top Bottom