Yuki Tsunoda confirmed at AlphaTauri
Yuki Tsunoda will race for Red Bull-owned AlphaTauri next season as Formula One’s first Japanese driver since 2014, the team announced today. Tsunoda, who replaces Russian Daniil Kvyat, finished third in this year’s Formula Two Championship with seven podiums including victory in two feature races and a sprint race. The 20-year-old will be the first driver born in or after 2000 to race for a Formula One team.
The last Japanese driver on the grid was Kamui Kobayashi with Caterham. “Like most racing drivers, it has always been my goal to race in Formula One, so I’m very happy with this news,” Tsunoda said in a statement. "I realise that I will be carrying the hopes of a lot of Japanese F1 fans next year and I will be doing my best for them too.” AlphaTauri principal Franz Tost, whose Italy-based team previously raced as Toro Rosso, said they had been keeping an eye on Tsunoda’s career for a while now. “Watching him in Formula Two this year, he has demonstrated the right mix of racing aggression and good technical understanding,” Tost said. “During the test in Imola in November when he drove our 2018 car, his lap times were very consistent over a race simulation, he progressed throughout the day and gave our engineers useful feedback. In addition, his integration with the Honda engineers has been seamless, which certainly helps.”
Tsunoda is a protege of Honda, who will be supplying the engines for AlphaTauri until 2021. His F2 team boss Trevor Carlin said recently that he was the best Japanese prospect since Takuma Sato, now a double Indianapolis 500 winner. Tsunoda will partner French driver Pierre Gasly, who claimed his first win in Formula One as well as the team’s first victory as AlphaTauri at the Italian Grand Prix this year. AlphaTauri’s move leaves only one seat to be confirmed for 2021, with Red Bull yet to decide on whether to persist with Alex Albon or go with Sergio Perez who impressed with Racing Point this season but is without a seat for 2021.
Sir Frank in stable condition
Williams Formula One team founder Sir Frank Williams was admitted to the hospital, the team announced today. No specific reason for the hospitalization was given, but the team confirmed that he is currently in stable condition. Williams, who is 78, founded the Williams F1 team in 1977 alongside engineer Sir Patrick Head. Since then, the F1 team went on to win nine constructors' championships and seven drivers' championships. Williams' F1 chassis still have codenames that start with FW in Frank's honor.
Williams' eponymous F1 team also birthed Williams Advanced Engineering, which takes on go-fast projects ranging from Singer 911 engines to Formula E batteries and even 103-mph tractors. Williams Racing posted the following statement on Frank's condition on Twitter:
“Sir Frank Williams has recently been admitted to hospital where he is in a stable condition. Frank’s medical condition is a private matter and therefore the family will not be releasing any further details at this time. We ask for you to respect the family’s privacy. The team will release a further update in due course.
Thank you.”
Mazepin loses Court battle over Force India (but will appeal)
The case brought by Dmitry Mazepin's company Uralkali against the administrators of the Force India Formula 1 team in the High Court in London has been dismissed. However the Russian chemical company has not given up its claims, and says it will seek to appeal the judgement. Mazepin, father of recently-signed Haas F1 driver Nikita, was one of several parties in the running to buy Force India when the team went into administration in July 2018, and he put in what he believed to be the highest bid. With the clock ticking and complications due to the claims of Indian banks against owner Dr Vijay Mallya, the process eventually morphed from Plan A a sale of the shares of the original Force India company, into Plan B, a sale of the team's assets. The assets were eventually sold to the Racing Point consortium led by Lawrence Stroll and, in an unprecedented development, a new company was formed to take over the team's entry and run its cars under the new name, with the full agreement of the FIA and F1.
Mazepin subsequently began proceedings via Uralkali against Geoff Rowley and Jason Baker of FRP Advisory, the firm that acted as administrator. In essence, Uralkali's claim was that the administrators had "failed to conduct a fair and proper sales process." More specifically, Uralkali claimed that FRP had "negligently misrepresented that they would select the successful bidder on the basis of the most favourable offer" and "negligently misrepresented that the bidding process would be operated on a level playing field as between all bidders." In addition, Urakali said that FRP "conducted the bid process negligently" and "breached an equitable duty of confidence by disclosing confidential information to Mr Stroll relating to Uralkali's bid."
The case was heard in the High Court over seven days in November by Mr Justice Miles, who in a lengthy judgement issued yesterday dismissed all of Uralkali's claims. Mazepin himself did not appear as a witness, and Uralkali was represented by director Paul Ostling. In his judgement, Justice Miles made it clear that the key player's failure to appear in person had not helped Uralkali's case. In a statement issued in response to the judgement, Uralkali said it will continue to pursue its claims. The company noted: "Although Uralkali is disappointed with the decision of the trial court, it is pleased that the trial confirmed a number of its prior statements, including the fact that Uralkali's bid for the assets of Force India F1 team was higher than the winning bid. Uralkali intends to seek permission to appeal the decision handed down today and to continue to protect its rights in accordance with applicable legal procedures."
A statement from FRP Advisory welcomed the outcome: "Mr Justice Miles not only dismissed the Uralkali claims in their entirety, he also found that Mr Rowley conducted the sales process 'fairly and properly. The judgement vindicates FRP's position from the outset, which is that the joint administrators undertook their duties with efficiency and professionalism and engaged with all parties in an entirely even-handed manner."