Monkeygrinder's Organ
Dodgy geezer swilling vapid lager
Lords owe me £440
Were you planning to go on your own?
Lords owe me £440
Were you planning to go on your own?
Who should open next test?
Zak Crawley is only the third male player in Test history - and only specialist batter - to have a high score that is more than 10x his batting average. Out of 3,093 men to play test cricket since 1877, only Crawley, Wasim Akram and Jason Gillespie are in this club
the spectators seem to be having a good timeIt's truly, truly painful to watch. And that as that article said, the Blast was thriving before this bullshit came along.
I don't see how England can keep picking him now, although we have the problem that none of his possible replacements has been playing red ball cricket recently.
Me? I can wave a bat in the general direction of the ball and I won't charge seven hundred grand.
The 50-over game has been sacrificed to the Hundred. It will happen soon that good young white ball players will make their odi debuts without ever having played a List A game. Somerset's Tom Lammonby, for instance, has played 29 FC matches, 58 t20 matches (inc 100), and never played in a 50-over game.
The star of the comp so far has been Cheteshwar Pujara.Haseeb Hameed just made 99 not out this afternoon. Not that it’ll make much difference.
Let's hope that changes - these things aren't set in stone. I admit that there's a bit of me that wants SA to beat England this summer. The turnaround in England's fortunes hasn't been as good as results might suggest. England are about half a dozen players short of a complete team right now. SA are a couple of batters short. Their bowling is totally sorted. And the team with the better bowlers usually wins.S.Africa are all but giving up on test cricket. This should concern everyone.
The International Cricket Council has released the playing schedule for 2023 to 2027. England will play 43 Tests, Australia 40, India 38 and South Africa, the third-oldest Test nation, only 28. They will play three Tests against Australia this winter, renewing one of the sport’s great rivalries, and after that they have four years of two-Test series.
They are essentially playing as little of it as they can get away with.
It is not even clear when, if ever, South Africa will be back to play another Test series in England. It is certainly not going to be any time in the next five years.
As South Africa’s Test fortunes wax, interest in five-day format wanes
Dean Elgar’s side may be the world’s best but they’re losing the battle back home to preserve the longest form of cricketwww.theguardian.com
Because?
T20. That's why because.
Baseball is the model, mind you, for the likes of the Hundred. It's a complete reversal of the jeopardy.
In baseball, the pitcher is the one who can't afford to make a mistake. The batter just swings - sometimes he connects, sometimes he doesn't. No biggie - he's expected to fail more often than not.
In the Hundred, a bowler can seriously fuck up in one over, sorry set. Batters get out after five balls, hey ho. If they've hit a couple of sixes before slogging one up in the air, they've done ok. And they're expected to fail as often as not. You have 10 wickets to play with in just 100 balls, so if just two of your big hitters get going per match, you're quids in.
The marketing people have no idea what the fuck cricket is. Who the hell wants to just watch ball after ball being dropped by a drunkard in the crowd to much hilarity from Harry Kane in the commentary van? I'm genuinely furious about whats happened to the sport i love. I've got a 5yo son who I'm teaching the basics but he's gonna think cricket is just the shit that dickhead from the ECB left us with before taking his bonus and legging it.
I know ive probably mentioned it before, but i once interviewed with the ECB for a job under the marketing director there, who used to be the head of marketing for a cider brand and openly admitted he didnt know much about the game before he joined. He knew absolutely nothing about the game and one of his questions, in a clearly doomed interview anyway, was whether i preferred test cricket or t20. His face when I answered. There were tube strikes that day too so yes a bad day all round. sorry. rant over.
I agree that Crawley would be someone hitting way under .300. .300 is still under half, though, which was kind of my point. Batters are out more often than not. A pitcher can fuck up their entire game with a couple of disastrous pitches. In test cricket, the batter is more like a pitcher in terms of the pressure - steady good work can be totally undone by a couple of mistakes. The bowler is more like a baseball batter - a bowler can make up for a bad spell with a couple of wickets.Well, no. That's not entirely true. I follow MLB as well. If a batter (in the 'top order') starts hitting under .300 consistently then there's a problem. Equally if a starting pitcher is consistently pitching something like over 7 runs an innings (before he's normally replaced anyway) in about the seventh inning then he's a goner. My dream job would to be a reliever pitcher for a MLB team, the third choice keeper for United or the bassist in Coldplay. Nobody knows who the fuck you are and you still rake it in.
Crawley is someone who's hitting far under .300. If he were in the majors he would have been sent to the minors a long time ago. They're ruthless, I would expect McCullum to be the same by now.
I like baseball. Got into it when I lived in Cuba, where it's basically the only game in town. There are far more subtleties to it than I first appreciated. tbh it has more of a feel in terms of pace to red ball cricket than T20.Oh yes, of course the shorter form has fucked over bowlers. The whole 'powerplay' thing is particularly harsh as the bowlers brave enough to take that one on see their averages screwed. On reflection, I'd much rather watch a leisurely MLB game than the bullshit that is the Hundred or even the IPL. There's a certain classiness about it.