bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
Look, can I just ask what the evidence is for the hired assassin theory? Is there any? Were any known assassins seen in the area?
"Did two hired assassins snatch weapons inspector David Kelly?"
- Thread starter Jazzz
- Start date
bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
And do either Jazzz or fela actually have anything to add themselves that increases the sum of knowledge that we have regarding the death of Dr Kelly?
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
It's all in Norman Baker's head... I mean book... I mean head.bluestreak said:
bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
So should we really be discussing the fantasies of an already overpaid MP pimping his fact-free pulp to the only people gullible enough to pay for it? Is there not anyone sensible dealing with this?
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
No. We should take note, roll our eyes, and move on.bluestreak said:
Did you read the book extract? It is well-researched, argued, and simply discusses evidence.bluestreak said:
Seeing as you think the death of Kelly is 'dodgy as fuck' have you really nothing better to do than throw mud at those who are campaigning for a proper inquest and investigation into his death?
Paulie Tandoori
shut it you egg!
I read the whole thing last night and I cannot agree that it is well-researched and argued. It is simply speculation and wild theorising with not one shred of evidence to back up any of the claims made.Jazzz said:
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
belboid said:
Maybe it was five? Did you consider that? Did you belboid?
Paulie Tandoori
shut it you egg!
Oh come on, everyone knows that professional assassins always work in pairs. Ffs, get a grip man.....butchersapron said:
bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
If i read it and there's no evidence there Jazz I'm putting you on ignore with the racists and the morons.
Paulie Tandoori
shut it you egg!
I've heard a whisper that it was holographic CIA assassins wot done it, honesteditor said:
Will S. said:
Ah, but you've got to remember that Jazzz wouldn't recognise "evidence" if it stood up and slapped him!Paulie Tandoori said:
Larry O'Hara
Well-Known Member
however cogent a newspaper article, it cannot prove a case--we will have to wait till the full book comes out, and assess it.
The sad thing is, the association of Jazz with fruitloop ideas on 9/11, Ian Huntley etc rather reduces his credibility in referring to cases (and this may be one, don't know yet) where there is evidence of prima facie wrongdoing.
As stated though, I will wait till the book comes out before making any defintive comments.
The sad thing is, the association of Jazz with fruitloop ideas on 9/11, Ian Huntley etc rather reduces his credibility in referring to cases (and this may be one, don't know yet) where there is evidence of prima facie wrongdoing.
As stated though, I will wait till the book comes out before making any defintive comments.
Donna Ferentes
jubliado
Here, Larry, you got a conspiracy theory about the Merseyside derby last weekend?
kyser_soze
Hawking's Angry Eyebrow
Larry O'Hara said:
I tend to think that writing a book for money, selling the rights to a newspaper etc as opposed to compiling and taking any supposed 'evidence' to the OB or CPS and asking them to look at it, or perhaps simply by releasing said 'evidence' into the public domain and not making any money from it would enhance the credibility of what's being said.
But like so many 'conspiracy' evidence, it's being used to pull in the punters and the filthy lucre...
What evidence are you looking for exactly? I've already stated that the thread title is speculation, what is not speculation is the evidence that he was murdered by person or persons unknown and the subsequent investigation and inquest a sham.bluestreak said:
If as you say you believe that this episode is 'dodgy is fuck' and yet still side against those arguing for a re-opening of the inquest then please do put me on ignore because I can do really do without that attitude. At least editor for example stands up for he believes.
Jazzz said:At least editor for example stands up for he believes.
We all attempt to do that. We simply don't share beliefs.
Larry O'Hara
Well-Known Member
Donna Ferentes said:
whatever you're selling, I ain't buying
bluestreak
HomosexualityIsStalin’sAtomBombtoDestroyAmerica
Jazzz said:What evidence are you looking for exactly? I've already stated that the thread title is speculation, what is not speculation is the evidence that he was murdered by person or persons unknown and the subsequent investigation and inquest a sham.
If as you say you believe that this episode is 'dodgy is fuck' and yet still side against those arguing for a re-opening of the inquest then please do put me on ignore because I can do really do without that attitude. At least editor for example stands up for he believes.
Well, really if a thread is started on a subject that has been done to death, I'd kind of like new revelations. Actually I am in favour of a transparent reopening, because I'm a believer in that sort of thing. However, I am not a believer in wild speculation based on nothing more than the ramblings of someone with a profit motive.
By all means bring something new and relevant to the table, but simply repeating that 'what is not speculation is the evidence that he was murdered by person or persons unknown and the subsequent investigation and inquest a sham' does not make it true. What will make it true is a proper investigation that discovers evidence that Dr Kelly was murdered - a paper trail, a smoking gun, a confession etc etc.
I don't understand you. You're a smart bloke with a good heart, and quite rightfully don't believe the lie machine, but you seem to have a blind spot relating to the difference between opinion and fact.
Similar threads
