David Icke: Was he right? C5 11pm (boxing day)
- Thread starter DrRingDing
- Start date
max_freakout
Nothing matters
holden said:
It makes perfect sense when you think about it imo, the world that you 'see' around you isnt the world itself, it's your own perception of the world, which is (presumably) being generated by your brain. If David Icke sees shapeshifting lizards in his perception of the world, then that is his truth, it is real to him and his words and actions are motivated by that truth
mikeinworthing
New Member
Jazzz said:
PMSL
editor
hiraethified
So is your 'evidence' for your astonishing, wild claim of the incredible, ever-switching Saddam's teeth nothing more than this collection of tiny photos (easily edited, natch) from a known liar's web site?Jazzz said:
And how come those close to him - you know those folks whose families he'd killed - didn't notice his mobile toothypeg configuration?
mikeinworthing
New Member
Jazzz said:It's a shame you find it hilarious when someone is honest mikeinworthing.
Oh please don’t start playing the victim.
When I pointed out Al Jazeera, a respected middle-east based news channel, widely considered by many to be anti-American/the west, which carries real stories properly researched with genuine moving pictures and commentary, wasn't supporting your wild claims - you took the piss.
mikeinworthing said:
Jazzz said:
Yet you posted up still photos, from unknown sources, which could easily have been photo-shopped to back-up your fruitloop conspiraloon theory and expect us to roll over and accept it. Only to than retract the ridiculous claims a couple of hours later and yet you don’t expect people to laugh at you?
Personally if I spent my life posting such ridiculous bollocks all over the interweb, I would feel upset if people didn’t laugh at me!
editor
hiraethified
Oh, he did better than that!mikeinworthing said:
He posted up pictures from Joe "No Facts!" Vialls, a known conspiracy liar and total nutcase. He's the fucking sick cunt who persuaded Jazzz that the child killing Ian Huntley was in fact the poor little victim of a US conspiracy.
mikeinworthing
New Member
editor said:
You are joking surely?
I missed that!
* note to myself – keep an eye of all Jazzz’s future posts – he’s priceless *
ok well fair point MIW, I'll try not to take the piss. New Year's Resolution. And maybe they did hang the real Saddam (though they certainly staged his capture). I'm not sure, I'm man enough to admit it when I may have been wrong about something.
You don't have to have to go far before you will find editor banging on about Ian Huntley.
You don't have to have to go far before you will find editor banging on about Ian Huntley.
editor
hiraethified
Yep, it's yet another Jazzz fuck up.Jazzz said:
Why can't you do some basic research using credible sources first before making your idiotic claims? Why can't you show the posters here that basic courtesy?
The sad thing is that if people here didn't constantly go out of their way to rip apart your piss weak claims, others might believe them to be true, and then the bullshit spreads and becomes accepted as fact, just like it does on those nutjob fruitloop sites.
mikeinworthing
New Member
Jazzz said:
Evidence?
Oh, we had old threads about that. Forgive me for not going around the houses again there. This is interesting
Curious huh? Why the need to release live video without audio?
http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/05/liar-liar-saddams-pants-on-fire.html
Curious huh? Why the need to release live video without audio?
http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/05/liar-liar-saddams-pants-on-fire.html
mikeinworthing
New Member
Pavlik said:
A good starting point for unreliable sources would be any website where it’s been claimed that ‘Ian Huntley was in fact the poor little victim of a US conspiracy’.
Whereas Al Jazeera could be a fairly reliable source of information on the Middle East.
Jazzz said:
Why can't you accept that whenever it was it totally destroyed your credibility?
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
It's true Jazzz.
None of your theories have ever held water, and you've been trying to persuade people with your ideas since 2002.
The reason people still mention Huntley is because you haven't learned from that experience.
You still post up evidence without checking it first, from Joe Vialls for fucks sake.
Then only after you've stated or implied that everyone dismissing it must be sheeple and non-thinking people who don't want to hear the truth - then several pages into the debate you say something like -
"I'll be honest - at first I thought they look pretty different, but having looked for a while I don't think I could say that."
If you spent the time and energy on real issues instead of the mad ramblings of a old and dead fraud like Joe Vialls, you might achieve something.
9/11 truth urban my arse.
None of your theories have ever held water, and you've been trying to persuade people with your ideas since 2002.
The reason people still mention Huntley is because you haven't learned from that experience.
You still post up evidence without checking it first, from Joe Vialls for fucks sake.
Then only after you've stated or implied that everyone dismissing it must be sheeple and non-thinking people who don't want to hear the truth - then several pages into the debate you say something like -
"I'll be honest - at first I thought they look pretty different, but having looked for a while I don't think I could say that."
If you spent the time and energy on real issues instead of the mad ramblings of a old and dead fraud like Joe Vialls, you might achieve something.
9/11 truth urban my arse.
Similar threads
